Iowashooter Posted November 28, 2014 Share Posted November 28, 2014 Which nordic follower is the correct one to get for this? The generic or nova/super nova version?The regular one not the nova one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nebwake Posted November 28, 2014 Share Posted November 28, 2014 Would someone please post a pic of the MOA Precision rear sight as installed on their M3000? I didnt know there was such a thing? its not on their site. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bill Schwab Posted November 28, 2014 Share Posted November 28, 2014 Neb: Yes, it is on their website...2nd page of M3000 services, $80. Sorry, I can't seem to copy and paste a link with this new computer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Garmil Posted November 29, 2014 Share Posted November 29, 2014 Which nordic follower is the correct one to get for this? The generic or nova/super nova version?The regular one not the nova one. Thank u! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BOOM Posted November 29, 2014 Share Posted November 29, 2014 Its under service with no pic's . Not sure what your getting for $80.00. Heads up; MOA has BF deal 20% off parts thru the weekend. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
openclassterror Posted November 29, 2014 Share Posted November 29, 2014 Sorry the pic is not displaying on the rear sight. I will have our office gal look at it on Monday and see why the pic is missing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Oskino Posted December 1, 2014 Share Posted December 1, 2014 I called Stoeger today and asked about when the guns with the serial number moved back are gona be out. First, she said she never heard about it. Then she went and asked another department and they said it has been mentioned but no decisions were ever made to have it put into production. Hey Mr. Tischauser can you sell me one of yours with the munber moved??? I think I may have ruined the two receivers I have by removing to much material around the mag tube. I may give you one. Jesse could you post some GOOD photos of the receivers I want to see how far you pushed the limit and if you could mic the receiver that would also be beneficial. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
P.E. Kelley Posted December 1, 2014 Share Posted December 1, 2014 (edited) You may differ but I see no need for major hogging out of the receiver. This one is just right. Edited December 1, 2014 by P.E. Kelley Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
louu Posted December 1, 2014 Share Posted December 1, 2014 I really like how this guys M2 is cut upwards. Close up at 1:15. wonder if it weakens the receiver. Taccom Quadload tutorial with Double Deulin Deuces: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jesse Tischauser Posted December 1, 2014 Share Posted December 1, 2014 I really like how this guys M2 is cut upwards. Close up at 1:15. wonder if it weakens the receiver. That guy is s hack! J/K Dillen is a badass shotgunner despite his lack of ability. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MarkCO Posted December 1, 2014 Share Posted December 1, 2014 I really like how this guys M2 is cut upwards. Close up at 1:15. wonder if it weakens the receiver. That is the best way to do it and how we have been modding the loading port from the beginning. It weakens the receiver a little, but not enough to cause a problem. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Oskino Posted December 1, 2014 Share Posted December 1, 2014 I really like how this guys M2 is cut upwards. Close up at 1:15. wonder if it weakens the receiver. That guy is s hack! J/K Dillen is a badass shotgunner despite his lack of ability. LMAO!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Oskino Posted December 1, 2014 Share Posted December 1, 2014 You may differ but I see no need for major hogging out of the receiver. This one is just right. Pat I came across a video of you teaching a Junior camp, it was really informative and gave me a few things to try. Thanks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
openclassterror Posted December 2, 2014 Share Posted December 2, 2014 We go deeper than Pat did on the non-serial numbered side, but not as deep as the Benelli in the vid posted above. We machine away up to the transition between the bottom radius and the outside wall. Access is improved by a large radius into the port, without weakening the receiver as much as the big notch. However, any of these is a vast improvement over the factory port, and with practice nearly the same speed can be achieved with any of these profiles. However, swap your gun for one with another style port opening, and you will be yard-saling shells all over the turf! I have never seen a Benelli receiver fail from the big notch, only scrapped from porting too aggressively into the mag-tube opening. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Oskino Posted December 3, 2014 Share Posted December 3, 2014 Tom I couldn't help it..... I got more aggressive and it is a noticeable difference as more of my thumb can get directly behind the shell. I THINK this is the last time I mess with my port. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NickO Posted December 3, 2014 Share Posted December 3, 2014 I'd like to go lower too, but on the serial number side. I quad load weak hand and need just a little more taken out so I can get the shells to past the catch smoother. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Oskino Posted December 3, 2014 Share Posted December 3, 2014 I'd like to go lower too, but on the serial number side. I quad load weak hand and need just a little more taken out so I can get the shells to past the catch smoother. Nick I was talking to a guy at our local 3-Gun match this past weekend and he said that you can get the serial # moved to a different location but only certain FFL's can do it. Just a FYI Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NickO Posted December 3, 2014 Share Posted December 3, 2014 Hmm I'll have to look into that. The quick research i did in the past says you cant do anything with the original one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EkuJustice Posted December 3, 2014 Share Posted December 3, 2014 A manufacturer can move the serial number Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
openclassterror Posted December 3, 2014 Share Posted December 3, 2014 Yes, he would need a Type 7 or 2 I believe. He is in essence " manufacturing" a firearm, with a new serial number that happens to match the original number. In his books, Stoeger m3000 S/N ABC123 is "destroyed", and Bill's Gun Works Model M3000 s/n ABC123 is "manufactured". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ryan N Posted December 3, 2014 Share Posted December 3, 2014 Holly crap Oskino, that is extreme. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Butterpuc Posted December 3, 2014 Share Posted December 3, 2014 Yes, he would need a Type 7 or 2 I believe. He is in essence " manufacturing" a firearm, with a new serial number that happens to match the original number. In his books, Stoeger m3000 S/N ABC123 is "destroyed", and Bill's Gun Works Model M3000 s/n ABC123 is "manufactured". Type 7, I have looked into it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
raleck Posted December 3, 2014 Share Posted December 3, 2014 LOL Jesse - Dillen is going to come beat you up! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Oskino Posted December 5, 2014 Share Posted December 5, 2014 Holly crap Oskino, that is extreme. Thanks Ryan I pushed the limit this go round Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kbhiggs Posted December 5, 2014 Share Posted December 5, 2014 (edited) Based on this thread, I just picked up a 26 inch 3000. I got the camo version for double duty as competition/bird gun. It's my first semi and all the info you guys shared helped me decide which way to go. Thank you. Edited December 5, 2014 by kbhiggs Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now