Jump to content
Brian Enos's Forums... Maku mozo!

Indiana Jones Preview


Matt Cheely

Recommended Posts

  • 3 months later...

Let’s start by saying there are spoilers below!!!

I saw this movie yesterday and came away somewhat disappointed. On one hand, it was a fun action flick with a (partial) cast of familiar characters that I have enjoyed for the last 20 something years or so either on the big screen or at home.

On the other, I found the film to be completely predictable - I knew within a few minutes of meeting “Mutt” that Indy was his father. I knew once they cut open the mummy in the storehouse at the beginning of the movie that aliens were going to be involved; a theme that was only re-enforced throughout the film with the drawings and then the appearance of the crystal skull. Granted, in the other 3 films, you knew Indy would triumph at the end, but you had no idea how he would pull it off to win. In this one, there was no drama or suspense, you knew what was going to happen and just waited for the last scene in the church.

I think that in the first 3 films, you are along for the ride with Indy. It’s almost like you were there with him on the car chases and airplane rides and fist fights. In this film, you weren’t along for the ride, you were just an interested observer - and there’s nothing wrong with that, it just seems that in comparison, I preferred the style of the first 3.

The hand of George Lucas was all over this movie as well - from the opening scene, which evoked memories of American Graffiti to Harrison Ford stating “I’ve got a bad feeling about this”, which was in all 6 of the Star Wars movies and I don’t recall it being present in any of the previous 3 Indy movies. (JR has some interesting Lucas observations as well which I’ll let him add in the comments section if he’s so inclined). It’s not that I don’t like Lucas, on the contrary, I have enjoyed the Star Wars movies more than just about any other series of movies I can think of - it’s just that I don’t recall his hand being all over the previous 3 Indy movies as it was in this one; it just had a different “feel” to it is all I’m trying to say.

Perhaps my biggest issue with the flick was the ending. In all 3 of the previous movies, you are left with the message that there is a greater good. A God, a greater power than man. That good will always triumph over evil thanks to the hand of God and God’s guidance. In this flick, God has been replaced by ET. There is no greater good, no divine intervention, but instead, a flying saucer. And for that, I’m rather disappointed.

This is not to say I didn’t enjoy the movie, because I did. It’s just not what I expected out of an Indy movie.

There were plenty of giggles for me throughout the film - starting from when Indy knocks open the crate containing the Ark and running fairly nonstop throughout. Indy - named after the family dog if you recall - has a son who has chosen the name Mutt; another name for a dog. Indy yelling “this is intolerable!” during the escape from the Commie’s jungle camp; echoing his own father’s words from the 3rd film. Indy’s refusal to grab the snake to get out of the quicksand, hearkening back to his dislike of snakes in the first film. I’m about 90% sure that when interrupted in class, Indy gave his students the same reading assignment he gave his class when he was interrupted in Raiders; I’ll have to put in the DVD to be sure. All that was missing was one of his star struck female students writing “Love You” on her eyelids. You also see the same disdain for government agents in this flick as in the first. And, like the first 3 films, there’s clearly a “bad” guy, in this case, the Soviet Union and I didn’t detect any kind of moral equivalency given to the USSR and the USA, which I was happy to see. And finally, Indy’s patented method of throwing folks out of trucks continued in this film as well.

All in all, this wasn’t a bad film, it just didn’t meet up with my expectations.

I’d give it a B+.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I saw it Friday and to say I was disappointed is an understatement

The movie, while slightly entertaining, I thought sucked

The action was cartoony, the story line was stupid, the characters where stupid

it was just a bad movie

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It was a lot of fun and well worth going.

High brow and all that sort of thing? Nope.

Very enjoyable? Yes?

I will agree. Cate Blanchett was HOT in this one. Also a lot has been made of how Shauf drove up looking like Marlin Brando in the Wild One.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was undecided as to weather I thought it a good movie right up untill the end. Mostly because of the alien/area 51 influence. I wasn't sure which way they were going with it. Then the spaceship comes out. That killed it for me. Kinda Indiana Jones meets X-Files. Thats an oil and vinager mix to me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I watched this on Sunday and I agree with a lot of the opinions expressed so far. There is a lot about this movie to like; The interaction between the lead characters is as good as any previous Indy movie. John Hurt is great as is Karen Allen. The whole movie has a problem with regard to the plot. There does not seem to be the same sense of urgency with the quest. It's not a bad idea for a plot it's just not very well done.

For example; they could have made more of the brainwashing bit where Indy is staring into the eyes of the skull and the hot ruskie is telling him that with mind-control the soviets can make people think like they do and the person won't even know it. They could have used that idea and had Indy drop the tracking devices without knowing he was doing it.

They needed some reference to a 'higher power' as the previous films had done and as a previous poster had mentioned. This movie could have been so much better than it was and it would not have taken much to fix it either.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

I saw this last week and was disappointed. I saw all three previous Indy films in the theater when they were originally released. In Crystal Skull, I found the dialogue to be trite, the acting poor, the plot predictable, and the special effects horrible. There seemed to be little on-screen chemistry between Indy and Marion Ravenwood (not like there was in the 1st film). I though using Shia LaBeouf was a pure marketing stunt (I don't think he can act his way out of a paper bag) - they should have used an unknown for the part. And it seemed that Cate Blanchett phoned in her performance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...