Should Rule 5.2.5.3 be Updated?
Should Rule 5.2.5.3 be Updated?
61 members have voted
-
1. Should Rule 5.2.5.3 be Updated?
-
NO - It is fine the way it is and I am comfortable with the resultant inequity20
-
YES - Clarify the rule to cover all common retention devices but EXCLUDING race holster locking mechanisms3
-
YES - Clarify the rule to cover all common retention devices INCLUDING race holster locking mechanisms5
-
YES - Delete the rule entirely20
-
YES - Delete this rule entirely and bring back the old holster retention test8
-
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now