Jump to content
Brian Enos's Forums... Maku mozo!

Shadow 2 Compact


Stafford

Recommended Posts

Just now, Currywurst said:

Rather just lower the hammer completely and let the inertia firing pin do its job as intended. If dropped on the hammer the half cock notch might shear of and the gun go bang.

 

There was a reason why the Colt SAA was carried with only 5 rds instead of using the safety notch...

 

Might, but also it's possible for the hammer fully down to go off on impact killing the RO standing behind you. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 124
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

11 minutes ago, Racinready300ex said:

 

Might, but also it's possible for the hammer fully down to go off on impact killing the RO standing behind you. 

 

That's not possible on a stock Shadow 2, only on one that has been modified with an extended firing pin and a lightened firing pin spring.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, RennBaer said:

 

That's not possible on a stock Shadow 2, only on one that has been modified with an extended firing pin and a lightened firing pin spring.

 

In theory at least. Anything is possible, sure it's really unlikely. But, I'd say it's at least just as unlikely a gun at half cock is going to break the half cock notch and go off.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, RennBaer said:

 

That's not possible on a stock Shadow 2, only on one that has been modified with an extended firing pin and a lightened firing pin spring.

 

I wonder, when everyone here was smacking their guns with hammers did anyone test a stock S2 with a broken firing pin spring? That's a known failure part, especially if you dryfire the gun much. I wonder if/how that might effect the drop safety of the gun if it's un noticed. 

 

I don't remember anyone mentioning that, and I didn't think of it at the time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Racinready300ex said:

 

In theory at least. Anything is possible, sure it's really unlikely. But, I'd say it's at least just as unlikely a gun at half cock is going to break the half cock notch and go off.

 

1 minute ago, Racinready300ex said:

 

I wonder, when everyone here was smacking their guns with hammers did anyone test a stock S2 with a broken firing pin spring? That's a known failure part, especially if you dryfire the gun much. I wonder if/how that might effect the drop safety of the gun if it's un noticed. 

 

I don't remember anyone mentioning that, and I didn't think of it at the time.

 

When the hammer is fully lowered onto the firing pin it's actually also resting against the back of the slide, so even if you were to hit the hammer as hard as you can the slide prevents the forward movement of the hammer that would move the firing pin. With the stock firing pin and the hammer resting on the firing pin, the tip of the firing pin does not protrude from the breech face. The issue with extended firing pins is that they often do protrude from the breech face when the hammer is resting on the back of the firing pin, so primer contact is probable.

 

In the scenario of a broken firing pin spring I would be less concerned with the gun falling on a fully lowered hammer with a stock firing pin than I would with the gun falling on the muzzle that could possibly send the firing pin forward with enough force to ignite the primer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, RennBaer said:

 

 

When the hammer is fully lowered onto the firing pin it's actually also resting against the back of the slide, so even if you were to hit the hammer as hard as you can the slide prevents the forward movement of the hammer that would move the firing pin. With the stock firing pin and the hammer resting on the firing pin, the tip of the firing pin does not protrude from the breech face. The issue with extended firing pins is that they often do protrude from the breech face when the hammer is resting on the back of the firing pin, so primer contact is probable.

 

In the scenario of a broken firing pin spring I would be less concerned with the gun falling on a fully lowered hammer with a stock firing pin than I would with the gun falling on the muzzle that could possibly send the firing pin forward with enough force to ignite the primer.

 

 

All the extended pins I've seen do not protrude past the breech face, so then you're saying they're all safe right? Which kind of invalidates your first reply where you said they aren't safe. 

 

You're also saying most CZ's are unsafe as they rely on a apparently faulty half cock design when they should be lowered fully down. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Racinready300ex said:

 

 

All the extended pins I've seen do not protrude past the breech face, so then you're saying they're all safe right? Which kind of invalidates your first reply where you said they aren't safe. 

 

You're also saying most CZ's are unsafe as they rely on a apparently faulty half cock design when they should be lowered fully down. 

 

 

All of the CGW extended firing pins that I have used have protruded past the breech face when hammer down. CGW themselves will tell you that their extended firing pins protrude on average from .000" to .004" depending on the model CZ.

 

And per CZ, non-decocker equipped CZs are supposed to either be carried fully cocked with the manual safety ON, or fully hammer down with the manual safety OFF. In all of CZ's literature the half-cock notch on non-decocker guns is a safety notch that is there to ensure that the hammer does not hit the firing pin if the user mistakenly drops the hammer during the cocking process. It's not a drop safety feature per CZ.

Edited by RennBaer
Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, RennBaer said:

The issue with extended firing pins is that they often do protrude from the breech face

Both the Cajon and CZCustom extended pins have the extra length at the hammer side and do extend out the back. So when hammer is fully down it presses the pin forward. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

CZ has not introduced a firing pin block or decocker gun in 10-15 years.

 

besides the P10, every gun had been a safety model pistol with no block.

pretty much follows CZ design for the past decade.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/22/2023 at 11:27 AM, RennBaer said:

 

All of the CGW extended firing pins that I have used have protruded past the breech face when hammer down. CGW themselves will tell you that their extended firing pins protrude on average from .000" to .004" depending on the model CZ.

 

And per CZ, non-decocker equipped CZs are supposed to either be carried fully cocked with the manual safety ON, or fully hammer down with the manual safety OFF. In all of CZ's literature the half-cock notch on non-decocker guns is a safety notch that is there to ensure that the hammer does not hit the firing pin if the user mistakenly drops the hammer during the cocking process. It's not a drop safety feature per CZ.

 

If the intent of the half cock is to stop the gun from going off if you slip while lowering the hammer they don't work vary well. I've seen that happen a couple times with shadow 2's. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, eerw said:

CZ has not introduced a firing pin block or decocker gun in 10-15 years.

 

besides the P10, every gun had been a safety model pistol with no block.

pretty much follows CZ design for the past decade.

 

Do you think that's just a cost cutting thing? To be more competitive with the plastic striker guns on the market today.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

S2 Compact SAO conversion. No different than carrying a 1911 cocked and locked. Same as an S1 SAO conversion. I have all of the parts in my parts bin, just need the pistol.

 

For inspiration:

SP01redux.jpg.0ca930332404a9a1fd781a864f3341bd.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/25/2023 at 9:24 AM, Racinready300ex said:

 

I get the impression most competition guys are anti decocker. 

Sorry, not clear on my post!

The lack of consideration for the competition shooters was more from a size standpoint, not the presence or lack of a decocker.

My preference only.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, eerw said:

lawyers have seem to trained the masses well.

 

That is for sure.  I carried a 1911 for years  and still do not as much though. Its my EDC for church lol. 

Started caring a DASA compact.  And because of what I have to wear a J frame in the pocket.  I have asked several attorneys about this that actually been to court and they all say no difference as far as differences is concerned.  The back plates on glocks  or things like that , that have any kind if drawings or saying like  "shoot them all let God sort it out". Are harder to defend than a SA only gun. By far

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/25/2023 at 10:37 AM, Racinready300ex said:

 

If the intent of the half cock is to stop the gun from going off if you slip while lowering the hammer they don't work vary well. I've seen that happen a couple times with shadow 2's. 

 

Isn't this more of a USPSA issue than a problem with the gun? USPSA requires the hammer to be fully down which requires shooters to keep the trigger depressed through the entire motion of lowering the hammer, rendering the half cock completely useless. It's hard to blame the half cock for ADs when the rules require it to be defeated.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, danwessondwx said:

I saw the picture where it doesn't fit in the idpa ccp box with the stock magazine  , but will it fit with the flush base mags?

8B4961B4-8998-49AB-86F4-7C3428E8BD9D.jpeg.2ade2af65852b67bb4ba2bd1d31bd117.jpeg
 

with 14rnd CZ mag

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



×
×
  • Create New...