BritinUSA Posted August 5, 2023 Share Posted August 5, 2023 I ran Gramms modified Docter scopes on a Tanfoglio Open gun many years ago. If I recall they lasted about 18 months. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChuckS Posted August 6, 2023 Share Posted August 6, 2023 4 hours ago, BritinUSA said: I ran Gramms modified Docter scopes on a Tanfoglio Open gun many years ago. If I recall they lasted about 18 months. I had a couple of those also. One made it to 30K rounds.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thomx Posted August 6, 2023 Author Share Posted August 6, 2023 Let's pray for minor only Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
terrydoc Posted August 6, 2023 Share Posted August 6, 2023 I'll be pretty pissed if they introduce another Optic division so quickly after dumping PODL without much of an opportunity to bed in. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MikeyScuba Posted August 6, 2023 Share Posted August 6, 2023 It was never going to bed in. Everyone (mostly) in prod is shooting a metal CZ which then either gets milled or a plate for ProdOp. Limited optics isn’t any different Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
terrydoc Posted August 7, 2023 Share Posted August 7, 2023 As a small sample in my state it was more popular than PDO. All Im saying was it was introduced during Covid so there wer very few matches shot in my region so hard to make an assessment on it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hlsccsfa Posted September 15, 2023 Share Posted September 15, 2023 (edited) On 6/18/2023 at 3:27 PM, OpenshooterMclass4lyfe said: I doubt it. IPSC typically has more sense when making divisions. Agreed, especially in the case of the rules of IPSC PDO vs. USPSA CO. Edited September 15, 2023 by hlsccsfa Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dazhi Posted September 18, 2023 Share Posted September 18, 2023 I heard IPSC has just added "Standard Optics" as a provisional division, with both major and minor scoring. The trial starts next year in all matches around the world. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thomx Posted September 18, 2023 Author Share Posted September 18, 2023 No point to have major... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dazhi Posted September 18, 2023 Share Posted September 18, 2023 If major does not make sense, I have faith that IPSC will promptly remove it, just like they did with PDOL. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whan Posted September 18, 2023 Share Posted September 18, 2023 Curious - is 40cal easily accessible ex-US? Interesting choice to do major PF if the popularity of 40 is even lower than in the states Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thomx Posted September 18, 2023 Author Share Posted September 18, 2023 General Assembly is next saturday, it is still not voted Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
terrydoc Posted September 18, 2023 Share Posted September 18, 2023 gotta love rumors Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BritinUSA Posted September 18, 2023 Share Posted September 18, 2023 5 hours ago, whan said: Curious - is 40cal easily accessible ex-US? Interesting choice to do major PF if the popularity of 40 is even lower than in the states Yes. For competitors that travel around Europe buying factory ammunition is less hassle than flying with it due to the weight limitations. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BritinUSA Posted September 18, 2023 Share Posted September 18, 2023 5 hours ago, Dazhi said: If major does not make sense, I have faith that IPSC will promptly remove it, just like they did with PDOL. Agreed; IPSC generally does a better job with existing division rules, it helps that they only change them during World Assemblies (held every three years). That wasn't always the case, they used to change the rule-book more frequently. Ironically, this was one of the key reasons why USPSA and IPSC rule-books split off in 1998. I do wonder if the Major requirements should be changed for Standard Optics. Perhaps set Major at 150PF with a minimum bullet weight of 145grn and diameter if 9mm. Essentially 9mm +P ammunition. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Schutzenmeister Posted September 19, 2023 Share Posted September 19, 2023 3 hours ago, BritinUSA said: [...] I do wonder if the Major requirements should be changed for Standard Optics. Perhaps set Major at 150PF with a minimum bullet weight of 145grn and diameter if 9mm. Essentially 9mm +P ammunition. Can't agree ... We already watered down Major when we dropped it below 175. Seems like every time someone whines about MAJ/min the chorus either wants to further dilute Major or to simply eliminate it. I'm not in favor of that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
terrydoc Posted September 19, 2023 Share Posted September 19, 2023 IPSC shooter here, just curious as to how the LO guns are measured for the division? Do they box them? If so how? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xrayfk05 Posted September 19, 2023 Share Posted September 19, 2023 @terrydoc as per the proposal: 15. A handgun in its ready condition (see Section 8.1), but unloaded and with an empty magazine inserted or empty cylinder closed, must fit within the confines of a box which has internal dimensions of 225 mm x 150 mm x 45 mm (tolerance of +1 mm, -0 mm). Note that all magazines must comply. The box must have a cut out in one side to cater for an optical/electronic sight. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
perttime Posted September 19, 2023 Share Posted September 19, 2023 14 hours ago, whan said: Curious - is 40cal easily accessible ex-US? Interesting choice to do major PF if the popularity of 40 is even lower than in the states Yes. But. It sems to be somewhat costly, especially compared with 9mm. .40 shooters are almost as eager to pick up brass at the range as .45 shooters. Our local outdoor range rules require cleaning up after a range visit but 9mm brass mainly ends up in the provided bucket. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
terrydoc Posted September 20, 2023 Share Posted September 20, 2023 On 9/19/2023 at 3:43 PM, xrayfk05 said: @terrydoc as per the proposal: 15. A handgun in its ready condition (see Section 8.1), but unloaded and with an empty magazine inserted or empty cylinder closed, must fit within the confines of a box which has internal dimensions of 225 mm x 150 mm x 45 mm (tolerance of +1 mm, -0 mm). Note that all magazines must comply. The box must have a cut out in one side to cater for an optical/electronic sight. Thanks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blackstone45 Posted September 23, 2023 Share Posted September 23, 2023 Proposal for standard optics division was rejected at the GA today in Greece. I suspect it'll re-appear in the future. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Schutzenmeister Posted September 23, 2023 Share Posted September 23, 2023 Interesting ... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BritinUSA Posted September 23, 2023 Share Posted September 23, 2023 4 hours ago, Blackstone45 said: Proposal for standard optics division was rejected at the GA today in Greece. I suspect it'll re-appear in the future. Perhaps they are not seeing a decline in Standard that the US is seeing in Limited. That may be in part due to the more restrictive nature of their Production Optics division. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dazhi Posted September 24, 2023 Share Posted September 24, 2023 7 hours ago, Blackstone45 said: Proposal for standard optics division was rejected at the GA today in Greece. I suspect it'll re-appear in the future. Thanks for the follow-up. My source was obviously overconfident in passing this in the general assembly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RJH Posted September 24, 2023 Share Posted September 24, 2023 Probably they new it needed to be minor only. And decided not to approve it since the proposal was Major / minor Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now