Jump to content
Brian Enos's Forums... Maku mozo!

Gotta put my 9mm Spartan on a Diet


dskinsler83

Recommended Posts

Ok guys and gals my 9mm Spartan is a tad heavy at 43.42oz. Bobby @ FGW says it can't be TRI-topped so were else can I save weight. Has a two piece FLGR, Dawson Ice Gap magwell, VZ slim Operator 2s, SVI ITS short flat trigger.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

First, I hope the 43.42 is with a mag.

From memory, the change from a steel MSH to the aluminum one from Dawson is the better part of an ounce and is probably the simplist change to make. They now sell the magwell with the aluminum MSH already on it.

On the G10 grips, I had Larry Davidson make me a pair and cut out the backs. They now weigh less than a pair of aluminum ones I have. He took 3/4 of an ounce off the pair which was close to a 50% weight reduction. They are a work of art on the backs. He does very nice work.

Now if we could just convence the USPSA board that an extra ounce or two on a 1911 is not a big performance advantage we could quit spending money trying to lighten up our mostly stock guns.

Also be careful of having the weight too close as the scales at matches seem to vary. I have seen them be off more than 1/2 ounce and there is no procedure in place to argue the ruling.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lightening the slide would make the gun illegal for USPSA SS division.

Appendix D5 -21 Authorized modifications Milling of the slide to insert sights, add or remove serrations, such as cocking or flat topping, tri-topping the slide, lowering ejection ports, cuts that are minor and cosmetic in nature are permitted. Duplicating features that are on a factory, mass produced slide available to the general public is permitted. Cuts that are designed to specifically or significantly lighten the slide, such as holes, or slots, are ruled as competitive advantage and prohibited.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

aluminum or GI guide rod

Plastic MSH

Lighter weight grips or G10 grips with material removed from the back like the Techwell grips are doing now

Single Sided safety

If you want to get more drastic

Flat top/tri top the slide short of the sights. Several smiths are doing this now.

Make sure metal under the grip panels on the frame is all gone that needs to be gone.

Edited by steel1212
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Now if we could just convince the USPSA board that an extra ounce or two on a 1911 is not a big performance advantage we could quit spending money trying to lighten up our mostly stock guns.

Also be careful of having the weight too close as the scales at matches seem to vary. I have seen them be off more than 1/2 ounce and there is no procedure in place to argue the ruling.

I agree with the second point, in that I've been a vocal proponent that a standardization & arbitration procedure be put in place, but adjusting the weight limit would be a temporary fix. Give us six months (at most) and we'd be saying "How do I get my tungsten guide-rodded, VZ gripped, tungsten grip safetied 1911 below 45 ounces?". I think that the BoD learned from their experience with the 140mm/170mm rules. They gave us that 1.25mm leeway and we abused that with SNL 4.2mm basepads, chasing that magical 22+1 2011....

To get back on point, the aluminum MSH is a big weight-saver, but comparatively pricey. I'd hog out the back of the G-10 grips with a Dremel (Please wear a dust mask. Polymer dusts and lungs are an unhealthy combination!)

Edited by Braxton1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I still don't understand how internal lightening is illegal, seems to me it's more about the cosmetics aspect of it looking like a factory 1911. In that the rule states no holes or slots are permissible.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I still don't understand how internal lightening is illegal, seems to me it's more about the cosmetics aspect of it looking like a factory 1911. In that the rule states no holes or slots are permissible.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

but adjusting the weight limit would be a temporary fix.

The current limit is low for several nice off the shelf guns. The TRP for one, it would have to lose 1.5 OZ to make weight. Then another .5 to be sure it would weigh at a match. That is going to cost someone quite a bit and for what?

It's the indian not the arrow, what does it matter if somone wants to swing around a 4lb gun? I don't, I just want to take a stock gun, put a magwell, grips and a FLGR and make weight without having to spend a few hundred on makeing it get to 43oz.

I love shooting SS as I think the extra stage planing and reloads make it more fun. I am just about to give up on it as i just don't want to keep spending money to try and get my gun to a point where I know it will make weight every time.

Sorry for the off topic rant.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hello: You can leave the top round and cut both sides of the tri-topped type slides. You can use a Briley aluminum guide rod and some Ergo grips or factory wood. I have a pic of a slide I am doing right now that looks cool and makes it alot lighter. I'll post it when the battery charges on the camera :surprise: Thanks, Eric

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...