Carmoney Posted January 2, 2007 Share Posted January 2, 2007 As if the ads featuring bikini-clad models in the Nov/Dec issue of Front Sight were not bad enough, this photo also appeared on Page 9: While the person depicted in this photo is not scantily dressed, the editors of Front Sight need to understand that this type of image is indeed a "trigger" to the many teenage and adult females who struggle with the growing problem of sex addiction. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Merlin Orr Posted January 2, 2007 Share Posted January 2, 2007 (edited) DO NOT...under ANY CIRCUMSTANCES...show this picture to one of "those" goats we have been discussing! It might trigger an "episode"..... Edited January 2, 2007 by Merlin Orr Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BSeevers Posted January 2, 2007 Share Posted January 2, 2007 Man that really messed me up. I was expecting the SV girl, Tara Conner, Eva Langoria and I got ..................... Excuse me Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mooney Posted January 2, 2007 Share Posted January 2, 2007 What a BIG barrel you have there..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tom Mainus Posted January 2, 2007 Share Posted January 2, 2007 Don't flatter yourself Mike, we all know that is your best "side" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DrawandDuck Posted January 2, 2007 Share Posted January 2, 2007 What was that guys number, I am going to need some THERAPY after this one!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DougCarden Posted January 2, 2007 Share Posted January 2, 2007 wow, someone has had too much free time on his hands..... DougC Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jim Norman Posted January 2, 2007 Share Posted January 2, 2007 Would someone please post the "objectionable Photos" for real. I don't remember anything "pornographic" in that issue, or any other issue for that matter. I would write a letter but without the issue, I would not be able properly respond. ' Why don't I have the issue? Pre-Christmas clean-up. Thanks Jim Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vlad Posted January 2, 2007 Share Posted January 2, 2007 I'll bring it to you Jim. Basically there were two different girls in their underwear. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DrawandDuck Posted January 2, 2007 Share Posted January 2, 2007 These are not the exact ones but real close.....in front site the first photo she has stipes on her undies WARNING: SEXUALLY EXPLICIT MATERIAL CONTAINED WITHIN! THESE PHOTOS COULD "TRIGGER" SEXUAL ADDITION OR THE UNCONTROLLABLE URGE TO GO OUT AND BUY A NEW SVI FIREARM! YOU MUST BE 18 YEARS OR OLDER TO VIEW CLICK "HERE" TO ENTER ONLY IF YOU ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve Moneypenny Posted January 2, 2007 Share Posted January 2, 2007 Hahaha... well no one ever said sex addicts were good looking.... or logical Nice photo make congrats on getting in the Mag! Maybe i'll get there some day and they'll get my good side as well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JFD Posted January 2, 2007 Share Posted January 2, 2007 One was the typical SV ad on the inside cover, maybe a bit racier than usual, but hardly porn. The other was a small calendar ad that wasn't close to porn. The current issue of Front Sight is apparently "safe" for perverts as the SV ad has been "detuned" and the calendar ad is bigger, but with no pic. I looked through the dangerous issue twice and couldn't find anything to match those 2 complaints. Finally had to check the quoted page numbers to see the "porn". I know of a couple of folks who really need to get a life... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Catfish Posted January 3, 2007 Share Posted January 3, 2007 my eyes!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jim Norman Posted January 3, 2007 Share Posted January 3, 2007 That's what I thought is was. Wow, People like this scare me. Can you say Taliban? Jim Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GeorgeInNePa Posted January 3, 2007 Share Posted January 3, 2007 One was the typical SV ad on the inside cover, maybe a bit racier than usual, but hardly porn.The other was a small calendar ad that wasn't close to porn. The current issue of Front Sight is apparently "safe" for perverts as the SV ad has been "detuned" and the calendar ad is bigger, but with no pic. I looked through the dangerous issue twice and couldn't find anything to match those 2 complaints. Finally had to check the quoted page numbers to see the "porn". I know of a couple of folks who really need to get a life... I have to +1 this. If those ads will trigger a sex addiction, won't pictures of guns trigger a homicidal attack? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
johnhurd Posted January 3, 2007 Share Posted January 3, 2007 If those ads will trigger a sex addiction, won't pictures of guns trigger a homicidal attack? Good point George, and I had to go back to see what I missed and wouldn't you know it no triggers!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Damn old is hell. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pskys2 Posted January 3, 2007 Share Posted January 3, 2007 (edited) Good Taste is a subjective matter. And I like being subjected! To advertisements. The Carmoney Pix is way out of bounds of good anything. Edited January 3, 2007 by pskys2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bruce Posted January 3, 2007 Share Posted January 3, 2007 Like a Dillon catalog....but very, very different, disturbing, even. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aircooled6racer Posted January 3, 2007 Share Posted January 3, 2007 Hello: When did you guys get your Front sight magazine? I still have not received one yet. Thanks Eric Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jane Posted January 3, 2007 Share Posted January 3, 2007 Be still, my heart Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
johnhurd Posted January 3, 2007 Share Posted January 3, 2007 When did you guys get your Front sight magazine? Saturday I believe......... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sslav Posted January 3, 2007 Share Posted January 3, 2007 I looked through the dangerous issue twice and couldn't find anything to match those 2 complaints. Finally had to check the quoted page numbers to see the "porn". I know of a couple of folks who really need to get a life... I have to +1 this. If those ads will trigger a sex addiction, won't pictures of guns trigger a homicidal attack? It is ironic that the same people who would fight tooth and nail to defend one right, will either actively trample or passively stand by while another right is being trampled. Unless we all unite and come out strong in support of all individual rights - no matter how objectionable they may may be to us personally - we will eventually lose all rights. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carmoney Posted January 3, 2007 Author Share Posted January 3, 2007 Be still, my heart See what I mean???? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Round_Gun_Shooter Posted January 3, 2007 Share Posted January 3, 2007 Be still, my heart See what I mean???? I think the shock gave poor Jane a heart attack. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gonzogun Posted January 4, 2007 Share Posted January 4, 2007 When I knew that I was NOT offended by the "sexy" ads, it reaffirmed my proclamation that I am NOT ... you know. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now