Jump to content
Brian Enos's Forums... Maku mozo!

POLL: Drums in Tactical?


Recommended Posts

With the ready availability of 60- and 100-round box magazines, some might feel that the prohibition on drum rifle magazines in the Tactical divisions is a bit pointless. What do folks think about repealing the drum mag prohibition?

Edited by StealthyBlagga
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think they are forbidden in Tac except at a few matches. But I could be wrong. I see no magazine restriction rules for TAC in USPSA. Personally I think restricting it to 30 round mags or a magazine length like they do with the pistol may not be a bad thing. But on the other hand if it ain't broke don't fix it comes to mind.

Pat

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I voted no, mainly because you have to draw the line somewhere between an open rifle & a tac rifle. However, I'm not a fan of 30 round mag restrictions either. Having the ability to choose different mag lengths adds a little fun to stage planning & shooting. 100 round Surefire mags are cool so if one of my competitors wants to lug a mag filled with 100 rounds around a big rifle course when you only need 36 rounds, feel free. :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Different between TAC optics and open comes down to bi pods in open (biggest advantage) and more than 1 optic allowed Which is also usefull at times. There are also rules on comp size like the JP tank brake is not allowed in TO.

Pat

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Perhaps the rule about keeping the same rifle or pistol throughout the match should be applied to magazines also...?

There are some stages where a drum - or 45 or 60 or whatever is the ticket to ride... maybe a "real" advantage.

I like what StephensOutdoors says. Want to tote that chunk around - do it the entire match. Might balance out the (real or perceived) advantage..

So....Start with a drum and keep it through all stages. Start with a 30 rounder and keep it through all stages.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I shoot the Heavy Metal divisions, so I am limited to 20 rounds only.Maybe Tactical needs a limit of some sort as well? But where? A Galil uses a 35 round magazine, most other rifles smaller than 7.62x51 use a 30 round magazine.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I shoot the Heavy Metal divisions, so I am limited to 20 rounds only.Maybe Tactical needs a limit of some sort as well? But where? A Galil uses a 35 round magazine, most other rifles smaller than 7.62x51 use a 30 round magazine.

At this point I'm not for changing the rules away from what works, the gear is already purchased and people are going to matches so no new limits or changes, just leave the Tac-Optics/Limited rifles as they are.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Perhaps the rule about keeping the same rifle or pistol throughout the match should be applied to magazines also...?

There are some stages where a drum - or 45 or 60 or whatever is the ticket to ride... maybe a "real" advantage.

I like what StephensOutdoors says. Want to tote that chunk around - do it the entire match. Might balance out the (real or perceived) advantage..

So....Start with a drum and keep it through all stages. Start with a 30 rounder and keep it through all stages.

What happens when you run out of ammo with the 30 since you have to use the same mag through the whole match. Hand load the mag with loose rounds? (Sarcasim)

:sight:

Edited by Alaskapopo
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tac division should be limited to 30 round mags?! goof.gif

Yep, If ya wanna shoot open gear, shoot open...

jj

The rules are what define open gear etc. Most matches don't limit magazine capacity with rifles and shotguns. So its not really open gear.

Pat

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I want to change my answer. I vote no to drum magazines, but after further reflection, if you need 100 rds of rifle to finish a stage, you need 100 rds. I don't know why you need 100 rds....maybe your prefer to shoot from the hip rather than use a sighting system.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I want to change my answer. I vote no to drum magazines, but after further reflection, if you need 100 rds of rifle to finish a stage, you need 100 rds. I don't know why you need 100 rds....maybe your prefer to shoot from the hip rather than use a sighting system.

I shot a course of fire once where it required 86 rifle rounds. I had a stage at my last match that in theory only required 39 but some people stopped at 90. Not all stages or matches are the same.

Pat

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I voted no.... I agree if you want to shoot open then shoot open. Or, you could change the rules to be like shotgun starts. You have to start with a 30 in the weapon, but after the buzzer goes off you can swap it or shoot it up and replace it with a 60, 100, 1000 what ever the flavor of the month is. My .02 cents (worth about .0000002 in current economic conditions)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

AHHHH...the oldest and most worn out "saw" in 3-gun. There is no distinction between and open rifle and a tactical rifle.......There MAY, and it would be a mighty SLIM MAY!!!! be a point IF we held rifle only matches....BUT WE DON'T!!!!! ALL the gear together defines OPEN, not just the rifle. So drum up. belt up, multi stack up to hearts content.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

RM3G is the only match that limits magazines (and how they can be set up) in Tactical that I have been to. edited to add: the NW Multigun and SMM3G also do not allow drum magazines. I should have researched that first!

As far as I have been able to determine, 100 round drum magazines were created to give an advantage in situations where the increased round count would be beneficial. And, since according to the patent issued in April of 1987, "This invention relates to magazines for guns. More specifically it relates to large capacity drum magazines which feed cartridges to an automatic gun", it is fairly safe to say that the magazine was created primarily for use by the military.

When you look at the definition of tactical, "of or pertaining to a maneuver or plan of action designed as an expedient toward gaining a desired end or temporary advantage," it appears that tactical situations are exactly where such magazines should be used. Seems to me, that Tactical division is the home of such magazines. These magazines are NOT open gear. If every open shooter in the US were to switch to any one of the available 100 round magazines, I seriously doubt the manufacturer of that magazine would be able to recoup their R&D and manufacturing cost.

The desire of some to create rules that attempt to guarantee the ability of Open shooters to shoot a rifle stage faster than a shooter in Tactical should not be the basis for limiting the historically available options in Tactical division. Some may want to argue that this is not the purpose behind wanting a restriction on Tactical magazines, but I have heard it stated repeated. If allowing multiple optics, bipods, and larger compensators is not enough of an advantage, perhaps the old option of more practice would be beneficial.

As Kurt said, the pistol and shotgun in open division also define the division. If Tactical shooters are capable of completing pistol stages faster than Open shooters, is there going to be a call to go to 10 round pistol magazines in Tactical? If not, why not? If the reasons and logic are good enough for rifle rules, why will they not be good enough for pistol rules?

"So drum up. belt up, multi stack up to hearts content." (Well phrased Kurt!)

Andy

Edited by AFH
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...