Chris Keen Posted October 10, 2007 Share Posted October 10, 2007 Sometimes people get so caught up in the task at hand that they don't have a clue of whats going on around them. See for yourself. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HSMITH Posted October 10, 2007 Share Posted October 10, 2007 ShaZAM!!!!!! Where was the livestock held in that apartment? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flatland Shooter Posted October 10, 2007 Share Posted October 10, 2007 And it probably wasn't evidence. Had to take it back to the department. No one would have believed it otherwise. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boz1911 Posted October 10, 2007 Share Posted October 10, 2007 Holy Moly do I feel a little ????????? Glad I don't use drugs....... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neil Beverley Posted October 10, 2007 Share Posted October 10, 2007 I sell them! It doesn't make me a bad person! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gameplayer Posted October 10, 2007 Share Posted October 10, 2007 That must have been the battering ram. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
folsoml Posted October 10, 2007 Share Posted October 10, 2007 That must have been the battering ram. D'OH! You beat me to it! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GentlemanJim Posted October 10, 2007 Share Posted October 10, 2007 It would be rather amusing to see the police beating the door down with that Jim Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bear23 Posted October 10, 2007 Share Posted October 10, 2007 That was the new model of crackpipe. "The Gonzo 2000." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
J-Ho Posted October 11, 2007 Share Posted October 11, 2007 I don't think it was in the house or a battering ram. I think it was a backup weapon carried by one of the officers. It's the new "Deep Concealment mark II" for all those raids when a backdoor forced entry becomes neccesary. I've heard the only drawback to this weapon is the holster. Officers in the field complain of the holster being, and I quote, "A real pain in the ass." to put on and take off. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JakeMartens Posted October 11, 2007 Share Posted October 11, 2007 I think this might be how they get someone ready to be a drug mule for them.....ouch!!!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rookieglocker Posted October 12, 2007 Share Posted October 12, 2007 it reminds me of "Lock, stock and two smoking barrels" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shooting for M Posted October 13, 2007 Share Posted October 13, 2007 I don't think it was in the house or a battering ram. I think it was a backup weapon carried by one of the officers. It's the new "Deep Concealment mark II" for all those raids when a backdoor forced entry becomes neccesary. I've heard the only drawback to this weapon is the holster. Officers in the field complain of the holster being, and I quote, "A real pain in the ass." to put on and take off. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kingman Posted October 13, 2007 Share Posted October 13, 2007 wow, some editor messed up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JThompson Posted December 28, 2007 Share Posted December 28, 2007 wow, some editor messed up. Either that or was just in a mood... Ah, fkit I'm leaving it in. hehehehe Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neomet Posted December 28, 2007 Share Posted December 28, 2007 I feel so........................inadequate. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dajarrel Posted December 28, 2007 Share Posted December 28, 2007 I think the police officer bringing the box out knew when he walked through the door what was going to be seen on film. It looks to me that you can see on of those mischievous grins on his face as he walks behind the reporter. dj Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michael Carlin Posted December 28, 2007 Share Posted December 28, 2007 I lived in Minneapolis for about 25 years. As far as I know the object shown is not illegal nor is it drug paraphernalia. So why is it being seized? Was it identified on the warrant as an object of interest in the drug case? :surprise: Or is the allegation that its use is related to preparation for tranport of drugs accurate? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now