steel1212 Posted August 8, 2006 Share Posted August 8, 2006 I ordered it then noticed the 0.090 or 0.100 sight. The person at dawson said the .125 filled the rear, I haven't had it installed yet, and that people prefer the 0.090-0.100 for action shooting sports? I would figure that the .125 filling the front sight would be what you would want? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mistral404 Posted August 8, 2006 Share Posted August 8, 2006 A fat front sight is a disadvantage. At a good distance the front sight will totaly block out the head shot and A zone. I am one of those guys who likes lots of white on either side of the front sight. It makes tight or long distance shots easier for me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Loves2Shoot Posted August 8, 2006 Share Posted August 8, 2006 .090 or .100 .125 is too fat for tight shots or long shots for the way I prefer to see the sights. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cking Posted August 9, 2006 Share Posted August 9, 2006 I'm one of guys who does not like a lot of white on both sides. Just a little. That way if I'm off some that side winks out and turns black. It also depends on how steady you can hold the gun. If your shakes cause the white to wink out, you need more. I don't understand the comment out blocking out the head shot. My guns are sighted so the shot hits target like period over a dash at 25 yards. That assumes I'm doing my part. Also not a big fan of fiber front sight, to me it changes size with amount of light available. Thus changes my elevation because where do you put the dot in rear notch. Plus distracts from concentration on placing the top of front sight level with top or rear sight. So what i've done is use a small rod and let it get dirty. That way it helps find the front sight against dull backgrounds and pull it into the rear notch asap. But since it small/dirty it doesn't glow, distract, or change sizes. When I was young and didn't need bifocals non of this mattered. But now that I'm and old fart and can't see. I've had to get my glasses setup so the dominant eye is focused on front sight and other on infinity. Took awhile for my brain to learn use the other eye to see the target. But if your looking at the target your wasting time. As JM stay focused on that front sight. IMHO Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mistral404 Posted August 10, 2006 Share Posted August 10, 2006 On a far shot, the width of the front sight can totally block the head. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matt Cheely Posted August 10, 2006 Share Posted August 10, 2006 Go with a .090 front and .110 rear Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cking Posted August 10, 2006 Share Posted August 10, 2006 (edited) I'm missing something here about long shots blocking out the head. Or maybe I've been using my sights wrong all these years. ___ ___ _ _______ |_| | | | | When I've got things lined up right my top of my sights is a long black line with two small white vertical slits. I center the horizontal line in middle of head and if target is very narrow I center the part that is visible it in middle of the two white lines. And if I squeeze the trigger and follow through I've got an A head shot?????? What am I not seeing????? So half the head is always covered regardless of the width of front sight? Edited August 10, 2006 by cking Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
benny hill Posted August 11, 2006 Share Posted August 11, 2006 Buttet impact is ON top of the front sight. Block out 1/2 of the head & hit it dead center. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cking Posted August 11, 2006 Share Posted August 11, 2006 somebody explain to me why a narrow front sight helps except to put more white on each side. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dan Sierpina Posted August 11, 2006 Share Posted August 11, 2006 Buttet impact is ON top of the front sight. Block out 1/2 of the head & hit it dead center. Benny, that's too easy, and it makes sense! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Loves2Shoot Posted August 11, 2006 Share Posted August 11, 2006 Not so much horizontal as vertical. ie. Zebra targets. I still have young eyes, big might be better for poorer vision. I like the smaller sight for 6" plates and mini poppers. Read BE's book it has the "better" explaination. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
benny hill Posted August 11, 2006 Share Posted August 11, 2006 I use a .070 ft. sight w/ a .040 optic. I need a lot of light on both sides for FAST shooting But can still do the prec. stuff by slowing down. I also can see the top of the head at 20 yds & some on each side of the sight for center hits. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coldchar Posted November 8, 2006 Share Posted November 8, 2006 I went to a .125 Dawson after having had .009 then a .10. The reason is old eyes. I opened the Bomar blade up to .145 wide slot. With a .125 front site I have plenty of white on both sides of the front blade and the extra width of the front blade makes it easier to pick up. Novak offers the same set up as an option. Try it you'll like it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lcs Posted November 8, 2006 Share Posted November 8, 2006 I ordered it then noticed the 0.090 or 0.100 sight. The person at dawson said the .125 filled the rear, I haven't had it installed yet, and that people prefer the 0.090-0.100 for action shooting sports? I would figure that the .125 filling the front sight would be what you would want? If that .125 is for a STI and you don't want it? PM and I will buy it. I got them "old eyes" also. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steel1212 Posted November 8, 2006 Author Share Posted November 8, 2006 I'm currently useing it. When I get my XD back with the .100 front sight I'll see how I like it and may switch. Its for novak cuts on 1911s. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JFD Posted November 8, 2006 Share Posted November 8, 2006 I use a .125 and like it. I did have to open up the rear sight notch, but no issues after that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CenTX Posted November 8, 2006 Share Posted November 8, 2006 Also not a big fan of fiber front sight, to me it changes size with amount of light available. Thus changes my elevation because where do you put the dot in rear notch. Plus distracts from concentration on placing the top of front sight level with top or rear sight. So what i've done is use a small rod and let it get dirty. That way it helps find the front sight against dull backgrounds and pull it into the rear notch asap. But since it small/dirty it doesn't glow, distract, or change sizes. Look at the Brazos Custom lightning rod FO front sight. You get a nice sharp sight and a FO that does not change size with the light. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris Keen Posted November 8, 2006 Share Posted November 8, 2006 I like my .105 front and .140 rear Dawsons. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steel1212 Posted November 9, 2006 Author Share Posted November 9, 2006 Also not a big fan of fiber front sight, to me it changes size with amount of light available. Thus changes my elevation because where do you put the dot in rear notch. Plus distracts from concentration on placing the top of front sight level with top or rear sight. So what i've done is use a small rod and let it get dirty. That way it helps find the front sight against dull backgrounds and pull it into the rear notch asap. But since it small/dirty it doesn't glow, distract, or change sizes. Look at the Brazos Custom lightning rod FO front sight. You get a nice sharp sight and a FO that does not change size with the light. Wish I had seen that before I got dawson's put on all my guns lol. Thats a pretty neat idea. No matter how big the dot is the hole only lets a certain size through. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aircooled6racer Posted November 9, 2006 Share Posted November 9, 2006 Hello: I have a Dawson from Shooters Connection with the 0.110 front blade and a Bo-Mar rear sight. I like this combo alot. I have a 0.090 with a Kimber rear sight and can't shoot as well with that sight combo, it has too much light on either side. Hope this helps. Thanks Eric Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ramas Posted November 9, 2006 Share Posted November 9, 2006 I have installed DP 0.100 frontsight with DP ajustible rear, and what can i say: wow! It's best config yet. Friend of mine has 0.125 DP front with factory rear on Glock. It is very good sight, because fo rod is melted in it, so it don't distract your eye, so shooting is very nice and sight tracking is very quick. So, look for DP sights, you will not be disappointed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HHjr Posted November 10, 2006 Share Posted November 10, 2006 I run a .110 Dawson with a Heinie Slant Pro and on a BoMar rear sighted 1911's and find it very pleasing to my middle aged eyes. But, I also run a .125 Dawson with the stock rear XD sight and find that perfectly pleasing as well. The notch width of these rears work well for me. I like daylight on each side but find the .090 width too skinny for me. HHjr Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steel1212 Posted November 10, 2006 Author Share Posted November 10, 2006 The more I look at my black stainless with the FO up front and plain black adjustable in the rear the more I like it better than the FO front and rear setup I have on my othe 1911 and XD. I may just remove the FO rods from the rear on those 2 guns as it seems it distracts from the front sight. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joe D Posted November 14, 2006 Share Posted November 14, 2006 I tend to use a FO front a little differently. I tried one of the thin ones and hated it. Spent too much time trying to get the sights aligned. I use a fairly large FO rod. I set my guns up where I use the FO like an electronic dot. I just put the dot in the center of the target. The dot fills most of the rear notch. If I can see all of the dot then my sights are aligned. No problems with long distance shots. Shot some clay pigeons the other day at 60+ yds. Just cover the pigeon with the dot and pull the trigger. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Harmon Posted November 14, 2006 Share Posted November 14, 2006 i run a .125 front on my 45.. and it works OK i think a thinner front would be better Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now