toothandnail Posted November 14, 2014 Share Posted November 14, 2014 Looks like it's changed slightly since we tested one. Not a bad sight, just no way near fast enough for 3-Gun - In Our Opinion 4 of us tested it, I liked it the best, but still not good enough to buy , I sent it back. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hotchkiss Posted November 22, 2014 Share Posted November 22, 2014 NSSF Rimfire Challenge allows it for their Limited Class while Steel Challenge does not. Odd... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
forddriver Posted November 24, 2014 Share Posted November 24, 2014 NSSF Rimfire Challenge allows it for their Limited Class while Steel Challenge does not. Odd... Does it affect the direction of ejected brass? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zebraman Posted November 26, 2014 Share Posted November 26, 2014 So is it legal or not for Tac Ops/ Tactical class? I was interested in using it in place of other 45 degree iron sights like Dueck sights? A representative of the company told me that it was approved by the NSSF for use in iron sight class. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TRUBL Posted December 1, 2014 Share Posted December 1, 2014 (edited) It is approved for limited class in NSSF rimfire. That being said......you can not see the target thru the optic, it is above the optic. We played with one here in the shop......no way was it faster than a red dot and and it was questionable as to whether or not it was a fast as iron sights. I'm thinking that USPSA will probably call it an optic sight......as for the 3 gun matches out there, it will be probably be up to the organizer......if i was the organizer (MD).....I'd call it limited class. Other MD's may call it an optic....and then you are in a pickle. I think there are better, faster options out there for limited division. I'm sure they have a purpose.......we just have not determined what it is yet. They are rather 'interesting'. Tim Edited December 1, 2014 by TRUBL Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
raleck Posted December 3, 2014 Share Posted December 3, 2014 As an optics company representative, I want to clear something up. Reticle is pronounced in any of the following ways (or so people must think). 1. Reck-tackle 2. Reti-cool 3. Reck-tal But never as it is it is written, which would simply be "reticle" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TonytheTiger Posted December 4, 2014 Share Posted December 4, 2014 I'm glad this bothers someone else. Now you gotta school people on calling a scope 1x6x24 or similar things as compared to 1-6x24. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
raleck Posted December 4, 2014 Share Posted December 4, 2014 I don't own any "Sa-var-ski" 1 by 6 by 24s, but I have tried the "Vortec" and really like it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TonytheTiger Posted December 4, 2014 Share Posted December 4, 2014 Too rich for my blood, I like a good Simon scope a Neekone. I once told the wife I'd like to buy a Swarovski, she got excited, apparently that means something entirely different the women.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
raleck Posted December 4, 2014 Share Posted December 4, 2014 You must be talking about "Saboski Crystals"..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cas Posted December 11, 2014 Share Posted December 11, 2014 If you are looking through a piece of glass or plastic it's an optic. Then anyone wearing glasses should be bumped to open. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doug H. Posted December 11, 2014 Share Posted December 11, 2014 (edited) If you are looking through a piece of glass or plastic it's an optic. Then anyone wearing glasses should be bumped to open. I was going to make a witty reply to this but the statement is just too silly to bother.Doug Edited December 12, 2014 by Doug H. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aquaticvisions Posted December 16, 2014 Share Posted December 16, 2014 If you are looking through a piece of glass or plastic it's an optic. Then anyone wearing glasses should be bumped to open. Ha ha ha ha ha!! Great reply! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aquaticvisions Posted December 16, 2014 Share Posted December 16, 2014 I sincerely hope everyone starts calling it a "rectal." "I was looking through my rectal the other day, and it look shitty." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kurtm Posted December 16, 2014 Share Posted December 16, 2014 Ahhhhhh.......smile I must! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sterling White Posted December 16, 2014 Share Posted December 16, 2014 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doug H. Posted December 16, 2014 Share Posted December 16, 2014 I have to drink gallons of that nasty liquid before anyone looks in my rectal. From the pictures it looks pretty clean but does not have a large field of view. Doug Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now