kita Posted March 12, 2013 Share Posted March 12, 2013 I certainly hope there is not a dress code added after that article in Front Sight on short shorts. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mactiger Posted March 12, 2013 Share Posted March 12, 2013 Doubt if we'll see that, either. Troy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gng4life Posted March 12, 2013 Share Posted March 12, 2013 Doubt if we'll see that, either. Troy ...a dress code or you in short shorts??? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mactiger Posted March 12, 2013 Share Posted March 12, 2013 Doubt if we'll see that, either. Troy ...a dress code or you in short shorts??? Both, most likely. A kilt, on the other hand... Troy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JakeMartens Posted March 12, 2013 Share Posted March 12, 2013 Doubt if we'll see that, either. Troy ...a dress code or you in short shorts??? Both, most likely. A kilt, on the other hand... Troy need to add a knee length rule for kilts Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chuck Anderson Posted March 12, 2013 Share Posted March 12, 2013 I'd be happy to add an "underwear must be worn by all kilt wearing RM's". Not that I'm singling anyone in particular out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ima45dv8 Posted March 13, 2013 Share Posted March 13, 2013 At least a weighted hem. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
splashdown Posted March 31, 2013 Share Posted March 31, 2013 Weighting the hem would be illegal in IDPA when drawing from an ankle or inner thigh rig. Good thing this is not an IDPA discussion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ima45dv8 Posted March 31, 2013 Share Posted March 31, 2013 Yeah. Good thing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mactiger Posted April 13, 2013 Share Posted April 13, 2013 I'd be happy to add an "underwear must be worn by all kilt wearing RM's". Not that I'm singling anyone in particular out. Jealousy is such an ugly emotion, Chuck. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chuck Anderson Posted April 13, 2013 Share Posted April 13, 2013 I'd be happy to add an "underwear must be worn by all kilt wearing RM's". Not that I'm singling anyone in particular out. Jealousy is such an ugly emotion, Chuck. It took you a full month for a comeback? How about jealously may be ugly but nowhere near as bad as the view up your skirt. (There'd be a little smiley here but I'm on my phone) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mactiger Posted April 14, 2013 Share Posted April 14, 2013 Nah, it took me a month to decide to get back on here at all. I think if you could see from there it must have been quite impressive! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
uzi Posted April 16, 2013 Share Posted April 16, 2013 (edited) Any items that are deleted are shown crossed out. Any new items are underlined and bold. hello ipsc long time more than 10 year make change like that - very good and clear. See this one: Edited April 16, 2013 by uzi Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ima45dv8 Posted April 16, 2013 Share Posted April 16, 2013 Looks good to me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ima45dv8 Posted May 14, 2013 Share Posted May 14, 2013 Any movement on this? I know there have been some large matches to keep everyone's attention, but something from NROI to encapsulate the latest changes is still urgently needed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CHA-LEE Posted May 15, 2013 Share Posted May 15, 2013 Maybe if all the USPSA clubs stopped paying their mission count and classifier fees for the local club matches until the 2013 rules got released that would get their attention. Being almost 6 months into 2013 and still not having the rules officially released is very delinquent. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nik Habicht Posted May 16, 2013 Share Posted May 16, 2013 Maybe if all the USPSA clubs stopped paying their mission count and classifier fees for the local club matches until the 2013 rules got released that would get their attention. Being almost 6 months into 2013 and still not having the rules officially released is very delinquent.All that would really accomplish would be to hose the competitors -- for classification -- and the clubs, for activity credits..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CHA-LEE Posted May 16, 2013 Share Posted May 16, 2013 I am not saying my suggestion is the best solution to the issue. But I am pointing out a valid fact that if you refuse payment to any business based of displeasure of services rendered they usually pay attention to those kind of issues. You put a monkey wrench into any business cash flow and it WILL get the attention of the decision makers. I am not sure if this lack of urgency to release the 2013 rule book deems it a valid decision for a club to go as far as stopping fee payment. That is for each club to decide on their own. I myself am not at that point, but the thought has crossed my mind. I don't see why it would take an organization of this size which has full time dedicated staff and a legion of volunteers more than 6 months to publish and distribute the new 2013 rule book. Maybe the USPSA and NROI team can shed some light on why this is so excessively delayed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nik Habicht Posted May 16, 2013 Share Posted May 16, 2013 The paid staff doesn't have much to do with it..... The BOD is in charge of approving rules changes. Generally they appear to consider it prudent to review the rules prior to publishing a new rulebook. That's a bit of work -- and they are volunteers. There aren't legions of them -- and there's even fewer legions on the rules sub-committee.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
remoandiris Posted May 16, 2013 Share Posted May 16, 2013 rules sub-committee.... I didn't know there was a rules sub-committee. Maybe a few shooters who are retired from FT jobs could do it. I'd do it if there was a call out for volunteers. BOD would still have to approve and that may take just as much time as it has now. I doubt a new rulebook is holding up much club activity. All it means is the old rules are still being followed, right? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JAFO Posted May 16, 2013 Share Posted May 16, 2013 Part of the problem is that there are several NROI/BOD rulings that are already in effect, but they aren't in any rulebook yet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
remoandiris Posted May 16, 2013 Share Posted May 16, 2013 Part of the problem is that there are several NROI/BOD rulings that are already in effect, but they aren't in any rulebook yet. That is not a problem at all. We all know, or should know, rulings posted to the USPSA web page and/or in Front Sight are valid rules. The lack of an updated rulebook makes no difference. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sperman Posted May 16, 2013 Share Posted May 16, 2013 So when I go to work a match, I need to bring the following: Latest rulebook Printout of rulings from USPSA web site Printout of USPSA BOD minutes All back issues of Front Sight magazine. Yeah, no problem at all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
remoandiris Posted May 16, 2013 Share Posted May 16, 2013 So when I go to work a match, I need to bring the following: Latest rulebook Printout of rulings from USPSA web site Printout of USPSA BOD minutes All back issues of Front Sight magazine. Yeah, no problem at all. That is plain ridiculous. You've never heard of pen-and-ink-changes? You never heard of page changes? Unless you have some sort of strange affinity to old Front Sight mags, it is very easy to cut out the changes. It is not hard to brush up on said changes enroute to a match. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JakeMartens Posted May 16, 2013 Share Posted May 16, 2013 So when I go to work a match, I need to bring the following: Latest rulebook Printout of rulings from USPSA web site Printout of USPSA BOD minutes All back issues of Front Sight magazine. Yeah, no problem at all. That is plain ridiculous. You've never heard of pen-and-ink-changes? You never heard of page changes? Unless you have some sort of strange affinity to old Front Sight mags, it is very easy to cut out the changes. It is not hard to brush up on said changes enroute to a match. Yes but when you DQ a person for violating a rule update from Front Sight it would be nice to show them what ruling the call came from. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now