outerlimits

fitting him to a waterboard as we speak...

+1

dan-was on my last pound. another forum member recommended 2200, and it became available. since then, i've grabbed 4 different rifle powers to experiment with. finally got load data to match the BDC of my vortex-just now getting to the final phase of load development-groups. giant pain, but maybe, just maybe, i'll get a winner.

aa2230 for all my rifle loads. been BO since december. IAC, been trying AA2200 and WW748, since i got 4 lbs of each. giant pain in the arse to work up new loads, but once done, you may just have a winner. can't say i have as yet...just prayin' for the BO.

Throw the barrel in a freezer for a couple hours...brass will fall right out.

tula small rifle at midway...right now.

been fixed fer years...

Would give a nut for some AA2230

+10 on the Maui guys. Ray and the boys will make u feel at home.

Happy B day and thanx again, Brian!

Iron lady-her and regan saw it all so well

now this was good... http://www.youtube.c...RMPsnC3s?rel=0

And I used to love the M 60!

Down again

Lived in Kali for 56 yrs-but no longer...travel back and always shoot there when I do. No one cares.

Karma is waitin for ya

Sick April fools joke?

"I always tell the truth...even when I lie". -Tony Montana

If you look at the 5 year.... you would see that lead was even higher in 2011 and 2008.... hmmmm. Yep-gouging..plain and simple. And yes, I understand supply and demand. have 35 yrs in ecomonist stuff. Econ 101 is bullsh$t. A party that hikes prices doesn't have to...period. If the component price for making bullets is stable, give and take a little here or there, and labor costs certainly are less...these folks ain't union, fuel for delivery and LNG for melting stuff has been about the same as well. S why does a company decide to hike the price because there is demand for the product? Because they can. They do not have to, but they determine people want their stuff so bad, they figure they can increase the price and make more. That is called sticking the consumer. Demand can be fixed for a cost...the result is more supply. But it's all BS in the end. Like I said, us MG customers have been assimilated.

If you wanted DaveG's offer but were too late, I have one of the same certs I will give away as well. Mark-i'll take it-thanking you in advance

sounds like one stage at ironman

heads up and hurry-powder valley just got in a ton of VV. ordered 320 & 350.

spent primers?

once again, not my intention to disrespect anyone and not naming names. AC4WORDPLAY was my scorekeeper on that stage and after the incident he even walked up to me and sad "What?". i'm guessing he heard the same thing. now, point of clarification...even though the 2008 rulebook changed the previous "Gun clear, hammer down" verbiage to "If clear, hammer down", theoretically putting the onus on the shooter if it goes bang, the key has always been the previous range command and the title of this topic-"Unload and SHOW CLEAR". (my emphasis on the "show clear" part). That command is not a request. in my CRO course my eons ago, dave stanford made it abundantly clear that you never let a shooter leave the firing line without knowing for certain that the weapon is unloaded. sage advice even today.

RO'ing a stage today. been CRO since 1991 and have RO'd a few folks in my time. guy shoots a stage, at ULASC does the flip and starts to holster...i ask to see the chamber. he says "you don't need to, it's not your problem". something about new rules. i tell him to show clear again. he does but is mildly upset that i even asked. proceeds to tell me the new rulebook puts all responsibility onto the shooter. if it goes bang, it's his problem. i tell him that's BS and that i would never let him leave the line without me knowing that gun is empty. he keeps telling me it's all on the shooter, and that the RO is not responsible. the shooter is a master and has been around awhile, as far as i know. IAC, can't believe what transpired-he should have known better. after all these years, i've never had a shooter tell me that.