Austin Hemphill Posted January 19, 2003 Share Posted January 19, 2003 I recently switched from 320 to TG, just to try something different. I bought a 1# can and developed a load off of it, and found it to be very consistant and clean. However, I recently traded for an 8# can and have had the opposite results. I am getting a 50+ fps spread and it is much dirtier. I wonder if the powder could have been contaminated with something. Has anyone ever had similar troubles? Here in Nevada, the humidity is low, and I always dump the unused powder back into a can when I am finished to prevent any humity related problems. However, I am questioning the treatment of the powder before I received it. I do not remember seeing any kind of seal over the mouth of the can, and I wonder if storing in high tempratures can cause any of these problems. Any help with this will be appreciated. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kimel Posted January 19, 2003 Share Posted January 19, 2003 Are you SURE that what you got was Titegroup and not something else? That would be my first guess. I have gone through several 1# cans of Titegroup and don't see much (any?) variation between the lots over the chrono. It is possible that the powder got damp at one point and then was dried out. Does it still "look" like Titegroup? Heat will degrade powder as well although it takes awhile whereas moisture is just about instantaneous. I guess if it was mine I would just suck up the loss and get some known good powder. Inconsistency sucks. Cheers! Kevin Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1badmagnum Posted January 19, 2003 Share Posted January 19, 2003 you should always get sealed packaging,if not I smell something fishy here.my surplus stuff doesnt come with a seal,but all my factory hodgdon does. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EricW Posted January 19, 2003 Share Posted January 19, 2003 Well...let me tell you that if your can was unsealed, I'd be damn concerned about the contents. Powder "stealing" is not unheard of. The trick here locally is for the dealers to peel back the seal just a crack and pour off and ounce or two off all the cans they sell. I wonder if somebody decided to swap you with some surplus powder that was supposedly Titegroup's equivalent. I now refuse to cough up money before I inspect the seal on the powder. If I buy via mail order, I only do business with people I trust. I also make it clear to them that they damned well better send powder with a seal that is intact. The powder manufacturers really need to come up with a better security seal. The crap that's going on is totally ridiculous. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vluc Posted January 19, 2003 Share Posted January 19, 2003 I remember being told somethign similar when I purchased my first bit of titegroup a year or so ago. Wanted to save money so I inquired about a larger amount and price breaks, etc. According to the individual...a person I do trust, there have been reported issues with titegroup in those larger amounts. The issues you point out are what he referred to as well, decrease in accuracy and power, increased dirt...so I go in the small amounts and have no issues. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mike4045 Posted January 20, 2003 Share Posted January 20, 2003 I have not tried to get titegroup in 8# cans. I have been buying 1# cans and have been very happy with it so far. I have been considering buying 4# cans. The price is not that much diff., so I may stick to 1# cans. Mike Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Duane Thomas Posted January 20, 2003 Share Posted January 20, 2003 I'm on my second 8-pound can of Titegroup - it arrived just a few weeks ago. No problems. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Austin Hemphill Posted January 21, 2003 Author Share Posted January 21, 2003 I think I found the problem. The toolhead has a crack in it and I think it is allowing the powder die to move. I switched it out with another I had, but I managed to shoot my skyscreen before I could chrono the new loads. So, I will have to wait to get a new set to test. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Duane Thomas Posted January 21, 2003 Share Posted January 21, 2003 Let us know what happens when you get it tested out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack Suber Posted January 21, 2003 Share Posted January 21, 2003 I just picked up an 8# can to experiment with. I also want to switch from N320 because it can be such a pain to find. Besides, I have an FFL and my distributor carries all Hodgdon powders so I can get it really cheap. Anyway, can someone recommend a load for Titegroup and a Star 180 grain bullet? Also, how does TG "feel" compared to N320? Thanks. Jack Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gunruner Posted January 21, 2003 Share Posted January 21, 2003 Jack I am using 4.9gr of TG with Star 180 gr CEB and a OAL of 1.200 and am getting 940fps out of my STI. Have compared it yet with VV N320. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flexmoney Posted January 22, 2003 Share Posted January 22, 2003 I load Zero 180g JHP to ~ 1.135. I use a lot less powder at this OAL. I'd have to check, but I think 4.3g of TG gets me 170pf in both the G35 and the P16. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joelhilgy Posted January 22, 2003 Share Posted January 22, 2003 I'm running just about the same as gunruner, ~4.8 of TG with Star 180, same OAL 1.200 with a P-16, and similar fps. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BigDave Posted January 22, 2003 Share Posted January 22, 2003 here's my TG data from early last year data Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kimel Posted January 22, 2003 Share Posted January 22, 2003 Here is some more grist for the mill. This data was taken on Monday. All loads are 4.5gr of Titegroup, CCI 500 primer, Winchester brass, loaded to 1.140 OAL. Temp of ammo and everything else when chrono'd (even the shooter) was 30 F (okay, the shooter was near 98.6 F but it felt colder). No wind. Overcast day. McDonald's Bacon/Egg/Cheese Bagel and OJ for breakfast. 2 cups coffee. Fired from Para 16-40. Each is an average of 10 rounds over the chrono. Fired 10 rounds into the berm first then stuck with a routine so barrel was "approximately" the same temp for all chrono runs. Berry 180gr plated Flat Point: 938 FPS, 169 PF LaserCast 180gr Lead Truncated Cone: 956 FPS, 172 PF LaserCast 170gr LSWC: 1034 FPS, 176 PF Going to play with longer OAL but this was what I already had loaded for my other .40 which really didn't like anything longer than 1.150. Why do I always end up playing with loads when it is cold? Then I just have to rework the darn things when it gets warm. Oh well. Cheers! Kevin Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rufus The Bum Posted January 22, 2003 Share Posted January 22, 2003 I really like Titegroup, always bought it in the 1# cans from a reputable dealer, but it is very dirty in my opinion. I only use a drop or two of oil on the slide rails and I get powder "caked" all over the inside of my gun and, although it hasn't become a reliability problem, I'm considering switching to another powder. 4.9grns w/180 grain Montana Gold @ 1.190 OAL =170pf at Sea level, that's the load I use for Area and Nationals. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tree Rat Posted January 22, 2003 Share Posted January 22, 2003 I like Titegroup as well but if anyone who uses it has some WST laying around, try a head to head with Titegroup and WST.......... TR Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack Suber Posted January 22, 2003 Share Posted January 22, 2003 Thanks for the feedback, fellas. Thanks Gunruner and JoelHilgy. I am using the Star 180 CEB loaded to 1.200", too. So, I won't have to change anything but the powder measure. I am shooting an STI Edge, so hopefully my results will be similar. Thanks again. Jack Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flexmoney Posted January 22, 2003 Share Posted January 22, 2003 Tree Rat, I have been loving the TiteGroup... But, I'd like to try some WST as well. Are you loading it for 45 only? 40? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DougCarden Posted January 22, 2003 Share Posted January 22, 2003 Hey Guys, For TiteGroup try using Winchester Super Lite (WSL) loading data out of the Winchester loading manuals. I think you will be surprised that they are the same. This is identical to the Ramshot Shilouette powder being the same as Winchester Action Pistol (WAP). Repackaging is a wonderful thing. Regards, Doug (Edited by DougC at 12:43 pm on Jan. 22, 2003) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Austin Hemphill Posted January 22, 2003 Author Share Posted January 22, 2003 I was watching some match videos last night and noticed something odd. When watching my grip, I noticed that the gun moves less with titegroup then with N320. And the lighter barrel in my gun lets it move less than the heavier one. I don't know if it was just different days, since the videos covered about 6 months of shooting, but it was interesting. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tree Rat Posted January 23, 2003 Share Posted January 23, 2003 Flex......... When I was shooting 45 in CDP, I liked 5.2 ish with Berry's 200 RS @ 1.190 for about 168 PF. In 40 I'm loading 4.5 ish with lead (ugh) 180's @ 1.160, bumping it up maybe .1 or .2 for Star 180 FMJ-FP's......both make about 168-170 PF. In my experience, given the same power factor, WST shoots softer than N320 and Titegroup in that order. Titegroup is awesome powder (I call it the 21st century Bullseye) but too snappy. N320 is not as snappy but emits lots of distracting sparks from the muzzle and does nothing WST and Titegroup can't given it's expense and availability. The listed loads are on the tight side of minimum PF's, I load with confidence because I found WST to be very consistant and stable with no surprises. TR Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gm iprod Posted January 24, 2003 Share Posted January 24, 2003 TiteGroup is slightly faster than WSL, but quite a bit slower than WST. The reason that the ramshot is the same or similar to WAP is that (like TG and WSL) they are made by St Marks Powder Co (Primex). All ball powders made in the US come from this plant in I think Florida. In my experience you will find that Hodgdon powders will vary less than just about anyone else in burn rate from batch to batch. Winchester discontinued WSL, WAP, WMR, 540 and 571 all in the same year (2000) so you will have to buy the nearest equivalents. I use TG for 38Super and 40 and get excellent accuracy out of both. I have found that WST is a little fast for 40 if you have to load to 1.15", but will work better if you can load at 1.225 - 1.250". WST is very good for 38special. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now