Jump to content
Brian Enos's Forums... Maku mozo!

Classifier 09-10 start position


Sandbagger123

Recommended Posts

I would agree but then read the rules which states:

8.2.2 The competitor assumes the start position as specified in the written stage briefing.

Unless otherwise specified, the competitor must stand erect, facing downrange, with arms and hands hanging naturally by the sides (see appendix E3 for an example of this)

Then in the glossary it lists

Facing Uprange ................Face and feet pointing straight towards the backstop with shoulders parallel to the backstop.
Facing Down Range ........The exact opposite of facing uprange.
based on the above it would seem that the RO is correct.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would agree but then read the rules which states:

8.2.2 The competitor assumes the start position as specified in the written stage briefing.

Unless otherwise specified, the competitor must stand erect, facing downrange, with arms and hands hanging naturally by the sides (see appendix E3 for an example of this)

Then in the glossary it lists

Facing Uprange ................Face and feet pointing straight towards the backstop with shoulders parallel to the backstop.
Facing Down Range ........The exact opposite of facing uprange.
based on the above it would seem that the RO is correct.

Nicely done Kenny. Good to see that some folks can take the time to read the rule book. :cheers:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If it said "facing downrange, heels on marks", then the RO would have a better case.

Personally, I don't think that specifying a heels/toes on marks position invalidates 8.2.2, but I'll defer to those with more high-level match experience.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It doesn't use the words "facing down range", so you were correct in what you wanted to do.

Gary is correct, as always. It has to specify "facing down range" (or uprange) in order to enforce the feet and face position.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would agree but then read the rules which states:

8.2.2 The competitor assumes the start position as specified in the written stage briefing.

Unless otherwise specified, the competitor must stand erect, facing downrange, with arms and hands hanging naturally by the sides (see appendix E3 for an example of this)

Then in the glossary it lists

Facing Uprange ................Face and feet pointing straight towards the backstop with shoulders parallel to the backstop.

Facing Down Range ........The exact opposite of facing uprange.

based on the above it would seem that the RO is correct.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It doesn't use the words "facing down range", so you were correct in what you wanted to do.

Gary is correct, as always. It has to specify "facing down range" (or uprange) in order to enforce the feet and face position.

this is what i have understood it to be. i had 2 CRO's on my squad and their opinions were opposite.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8.2.2: The competitor assumes the start position as specified in the written stage briefing. Unless otherwise specified, the competitor must stand erect, facing downrange, with arms and hands hanging naturally by the sides

I was recently emailing with Troy asking him a few questions including one on 8.2.2 and whether if the WSB states anything regarding the start position (such as heels on X's) does that invalidate all of the default start position in 8.2.2, this is his response:

"Once the stage briefing specifies any other start position, then all bets are off. If it specifies "toes on X marks", and nothing else, then the competitor can be turned however he wishes. He cannot, of course, start touching his gun or ammo. That's why it's important to write a concise but definitive start position into a stage if the default is not being used."

So the RO was incorrect

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8.2.2: The competitor assumes the start position as specified in the written stage briefing. Unless otherwise specified, the competitor must stand erect, facing downrange, with arms and hands hanging naturally by the sides

I was recently emailing with Troy asking him a few questions including one on 8.2.2 and whether if the WSB states anything regarding the start position (such as heels on X's) does that invalidate all of the default start position in 8.2.2, this is his response:

"Once the stage briefing specifies any other start position, then all bets are off. If it specifies "toes on X marks", and nothing else, then the competitor can be turned however he wishes. He cannot, of course, start touching his gun or ammo. That's why it's important to write a concise but definitive start position into a stage if the default is not being used."

So the RO was incorrect

They need to change the wording on that rule. It confuses a lot of folks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It does, but it shouldn't. Because an exact position in the shooting area IS specified, that means the sentence starting "Unless otherwise specified" is null and void, because the stage designer should have stated what the competitor's body position is. Most people assume that because people have to write "Standing in the shooting area, toes/heels on marks, facing uprange" to get someone facing uprange that it's the opposite of saying nothing and nothing is downrange. That is untrue. If a stage designer wanted to allow any body position, they could write "standing in the shooting area, toes on marks, facing away from the targets/in some specific direction without using the word 'uprange'" to do so. "Uprange" and "downrange" specify both a body position and orientation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It doesn't use the words "facing down range", so you were correct in what you wanted to do.

Gary is correct, as always. It has to specify "facing down range" (or uprange) in order to enforce the feet and face position.

Well, not always:)
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8.2.2: The competitor assumes the start position as specified in the written stage briefing. Unless otherwise specified, the competitor must stand erect, facing downrange, with arms and hands hanging naturally by the sides

I was recently emailing with Troy asking him a few questions including one on 8.2.2 and whether if the WSB states anything regarding the start position (such as heels on X's) does that invalidate all of the default start position in 8.2.2, this is his response:

"Once the stage briefing specifies any other start position, then all bets are off. If it specifies "toes on X marks", and nothing else, then the competitor can be turned however he wishes. He cannot, of course, start touching his gun or ammo. That's why it's important to write a concise but definitive start position into a stage if the default is not being used."

So the RO was incorrect

wait, why is it important? It's only important if you have something specific you want shooters to do. If you want to let them solve the problem their own way, then specify what you need to specify.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They need to change the wording on that rule. It confuses a lot of folks.

Yeah it does and this question in some form seems to get asked here every few months so I figured I'd get the real answer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8.2.2: The competitor assumes the start position as specified in the written stage briefing. Unless otherwise specified, the competitor must stand erect, facing downrange, with arms and hands hanging naturally by the sides

I was recently emailing with Troy asking him a few questions including one on 8.2.2 and whether if the WSB states anything regarding the start position (such as heels on X's) does that invalidate all of the default start position in 8.2.2, this is his response:

"Once the stage briefing specifies any other start position, then all bets are off. If it specifies "toes on X marks", and nothing else, then the competitor can be turned however he wishes. He cannot, of course, start touching his gun or ammo. That's why it's important to write a concise but definitive start position into a stage if the default is not being used."

So the RO was incorrect

wait, why is it important? It's only important if you have something specific you want shooters to do. If you want to let them solve the problem their own way, then specify what you need to specify.

Isn't that what Troy was saying?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...