RickT Posted March 13, 2020 Share Posted March 13, 2020 I have a 512 on what is now my wife's PCC toy. We both really like the circle dot for steel challenge, but I'm intrigued by the smaller circle on the pistol sight variants. Anyone running one of these on their PCC? Opinions much appreciated. The trade is small eyebox, but the cheek weld is your friend and the small sight will be less intrusive in the visual field. Link to comment
Dan Sierpina Posted March 13, 2020 Share Posted March 13, 2020 I used a 507 for a while. My astigmatism was the reason I changed it to a prismatic sight. The sight worked well enough, just the lack of focus drove me nuts. Link to comment
MatroskinT Posted March 13, 2020 Share Posted March 13, 2020 Using 507 as well on PCC. Using 510 on handgun, the circle is good for the steel challenge but otherwise not very useful. Link to comment
Cuz Posted March 13, 2020 Share Posted March 13, 2020 I just went thru this and decided to put a 507c on my PCC. Haven’t shot it yet, but since it replaced a Burris FF3 I think the field of view will be acceptable. I would really like the 510 optic with the 507 sized reticle. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Link to comment
kahless5876 Posted March 13, 2020 Share Posted March 13, 2020 Just put a 407co on my daughters pcc. She's going to try that one out this year. It has an 8moa ring Link to comment
RickT Posted March 13, 2020 Author Share Posted March 13, 2020 1 hour ago, Cuz said: ... I would really like the 510 optic with the 507 sized reticle... Agree 100%, but I'll give the 507 a try. Link to comment
jowbow Posted March 14, 2020 Share Posted March 14, 2020 4 hours ago, Cuz said: I would really like the 510 optic with the 507 sized reticle. I run a 510 and an offset 507. This sounds great! Link to comment
RickT Posted March 25, 2020 Author Share Posted March 25, 2020 Tried the 507 yesterday and had no trouble keeping my right eye in the eye box. I did notice the benefit of the smaller sight (versus 510) in terms of target acquisition; much less of the visual field is obscured by the small sight. Also found the smaller circle to work a bit better than the 65 MOA. Link to comment
Frozen Posted March 30, 2020 Share Posted March 30, 2020 Just bought myself a 507c going to try it on my Ruger pccSent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Link to comment
Frozen Posted March 30, 2020 Share Posted March 30, 2020 Just bought myself a 507c going to try it on my Ruger pccSent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Link to comment
TRUBL Posted March 30, 2020 Share Posted March 30, 2020 I use a 507C on my Steel Challenge carbine.......seems to bracket the plates better. For USPSA, I use the 510C Link to comment
rhowell309 Posted March 30, 2020 Share Posted March 30, 2020 I just went thru this and decided to put a 507c on my PCC. Haven’t shot it yet, but since it replaced a Burris FF3 I think the field of view will be acceptable. I would really like the 510 optic with the 507 sized reticle. Sent from my iPhone using TapatalkI’ve been saying the same thing. Give me a 510 in 32.5 moa. Link to comment
Cuz Posted March 30, 2020 Share Posted March 30, 2020 Just one? Heck, I’d buy 2 or 3 of them!Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Link to comment
rhowell309 Posted March 30, 2020 Share Posted March 30, 2020 Just one? Heck, I’d buy 2 or 3 of them!Sent from my iPhone using TapatalkI could see 3 or so. Link to comment
philmadxx Posted April 1, 2020 Share Posted April 1, 2020 I have the 510, I love the circle-dot, I have the 507 on a pistol, too small for PCC for me. I find that keeping the circle-dot brightness down so I can focus on the target, not the dot helps me a lot. It sort if overlays the target.The dot alone is harder for me to pick up. Sent from my SM-G960U using Tapatalk Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now