rtr Posted April 14, 2005 Share Posted April 14, 2005 Is it legal to sell hi cap magazines to someone in California? What about just a hi cap tube? What about a hi cap tube and internals, in the same box but unassembled? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rob Boudrie Posted April 14, 2005 Share Posted April 14, 2005 I don't know about tubes, but it is illegal to posess > 10 rounds mags in CA unless you are LEO or personally posessed the specific mags in CA prior to the Caliban. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
D.Hayden Posted April 14, 2005 Share Posted April 14, 2005 (edited) I deleted my comments, in favor of Bevens which are much better worded.. Dave Edited April 14, 2005 by BerKim Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
George Posted April 14, 2005 Share Posted April 14, 2005 In a word, No. But there is the case of replacement tubes being OK to purchase if the original tubes being replaced were grandfathered in. The basepads, followers and springs are just parts, the hi-cap tube is the bad boy here and prior ownership is the key to ownership "AT ALL" in California exactly as Rob mentioned. -- Regards, Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
davecutts Posted April 14, 2005 Share Posted April 14, 2005 Where is Team GE? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TeamGE Posted April 14, 2005 Share Posted April 14, 2005 This has all been talked about and answered before, and I find it inappropiate to ask legality questions in this forum. Most gun laws are written by people who don't know what they doing, and the enforcement of these laws is usually done by the same sort of people. What we, (the people on this forum) read and understand about these laws is usually done with common sence in mind, but what the prosecutors of the law do, does not always use common sence, (rant off). And please, no California bashing. We, (California residents that own guns) did not write or vote for these laws. I am not a lawyer, and what I understand about the California magazine laws is my interpretation of them. You can not buy, sell, trade, or give away a magazine that holds more than 10 rounds, (hicap mag) in the state of California. You can sell your mags outside of California. It is legal to own and use a hicap mag in the state of California. You can buy replacement parts to repair your hicap mags, (tube, follower, spring and base pad). You can not manufacture a new hicap mag from these parts, only repair a mag you already own. If all these parts are in a box, unassembled, do you have a working mag? (prosecutors chime in). What if only some of the parts are in a box? I would say you are safe. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
carinab Posted April 14, 2005 Share Posted April 14, 2005 As a former Kalifornian who moved before the ban, the question I have is - how do you prove you owned it before the law went into effect? And, isn't the litmus for ownership based on possession? Well you get the idea... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
diehli Posted April 14, 2005 Share Posted April 14, 2005 As a former Californian who moved before the ban, the question I have is - how do you prove you owned it before the law went into effect? And, isn't the litmus for ownership based on possession? Well you get the idea... <{POST_SNAPBACK}> You've got it backwards. They have to prove you didn't own it... that whole "burden of proof" thing. I've ordered tubes, followers, springs, and basepads from Brownells and had them all ship in the same package. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flexmoney Posted April 15, 2005 Share Posted April 15, 2005 I was going to mention the "burden of proof" deal, but we had a law in Ohio (before we got our new CCW law last year). It was an "affirmative defense"...meaning that you had to prove you were not guilty (had a reason to carry). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bountyhunter Posted April 15, 2005 Share Posted April 15, 2005 Somebody on CaliGuns was asking if he could sell his stash of HI-Caps when he sold his Beretta 92 (he owned the mags legally). I told him there was no leagl way to sell or give the new owner of the gun the hi-cap mags, he would have to throw them away.... I recommended putting them in a plastic bag and setting them out by the curb for the trash collector to pick up, or perhaps they might be found by some lucky citizen who happened to be walking by and had just purchased a Beretta which could use them. The fellow replied and said he had asked the local sheriff what to do and he had told him the same thing! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rtr Posted April 15, 2005 Author Share Posted April 15, 2005 The reason I ask this question is this: I advertised 2 hi cap mag tubes for sale, with or without springs, followers and basepads (unassembled). Someone said he would take them all (tubes and parts), sent me a money order, turns out this person lives in CA. I told him I wouldn't sell them to him, because I thought it was illegal, and even if it's legal I'm not comfortable with it. So what would you do in this situation? (Obviously I should have added the caveat that I wouldn't sell to states that prohibit the items, which I did not do) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
warpspeed Posted April 15, 2005 Share Posted April 15, 2005 Is it legal to sell hi cap magazines to someone in California?What about just a hi cap tube? What about a hi cap tube and internals, in the same box but unassembled? <{POST_SNAPBACK}> 1) It is illegal to sell, offer to sell, import ( for sale or not), lend, give, etc magazines with a capcity greater than 10 in CA. 2) Tubes are not magazines. Just like barrels are not guns. Just like cars are not refrigerators. 3) here is my take - if you buy everything to build a magazine from a mail order supplier and 2 weeks later you have a newly built mags in your range bag, I'm going to say you bought the parts and built the mags. And I bet I could convince 12 others of the same thing. Now I may be wrong, but that's how I see it. So to protect myself from someone who may not see that I was buying replacement parts, I would not create a paper trail that would suggest I was breaking the law. And as a seller, I would not sell complete mags, assembled or not, to someone in California. And I live here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Loves2Shoot Posted April 15, 2005 Share Posted April 15, 2005 3) here is my take - if you buy everything to build a magazine from a mail order supplier and 2 weeks later you have a newly built mags in your range bag, I'm going to say you bought the parts and built the mags. And I bet I could convince 12 others of the same thing. Now I may be wrong, but that's how I see it. So to protect myself from someone who may not see that I was buying replacement parts, I would not create a paper trail that would suggest I was breaking the law. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Yea, that's what Brownells said. They said please make two orders next time, in the old days before the suneset of "the ban." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
George Posted April 16, 2005 Share Posted April 16, 2005 It is illegal to make new magazines that did not exist in CA before the ban from parts PERIOD -- Regards, Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now