ck1 Posted November 12, 2012 Share Posted November 12, 2012 This is what I see when I'm shooting my G20SF Limited Gun. I run Sevigny's w/.115" wide fronts on all my Glocks. I run the same. Great pic. +1. I've run the same ratio with a tighter "window" on my CZ's (.125" rear notch & .090" front) that kicked ass too, but the CZ rears only come serrated, the plain non-serrated Warren/Sevigny rear is subtle genius IMHO and wins hands down. Crisp, uncomplicated, almost downright elegant in how simple (though effective) it is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
waktasz Posted November 12, 2012 Share Posted November 12, 2012 Dawson adjustable rear with an enormously tall, .090 front from Ameriglo (Dawson wouldn't make me a .090 for a Glock). All black. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rodan Posted November 13, 2012 Share Posted November 13, 2012 Bo-Mar rear Dawson red fo front .100 w Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
comeandtakeit Posted November 14, 2012 Author Share Posted November 14, 2012 Ended up going with the Warren Tactical Sevigny Competition rear and plain black front. Thanks for the input guys! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JimmyZip Posted November 14, 2012 Share Posted November 14, 2012 This is what I see when I'm shooting my G20SF Limited Gun. I run Sevigny's w/.115" wide fronts on all my Glocks. I run the same. Great pic. Now I know what the previous owner of my pistol used. Thanks! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dohboy Posted November 14, 2012 Share Posted November 14, 2012 The Sevigny comp rear sight has worked very well for me. The DPs are also great sights, but I just prefer the sight picture of the Sevignys. In the end, it's just a matter of personal preference. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EkuJustice Posted November 18, 2012 Share Posted November 18, 2012 It really is a personal preference thing. I typically for sights in the .110-.115 range for my front sights and a .115-.120 rear as I don't liike a ton of light on the sides. For me, If front is visible in the rear even if touching either side its good enough for a good hit. I shoot better and faster with this combo. Others shoot better with a thin front and huge rear. Try some combos out at the club and see what looks best Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mike41 Posted November 18, 2012 Share Posted November 18, 2012 Meat, Which sights are using exactly? Trying to see exactly which option you have. The below is from the web site. Glock Plain Black Sights Front Sight: .115” wide x .215” OR .245″ tall, serrations, black oxide finish, 3/16” hex screw retention. Rear Sight: .130” OR .150″ wide x .120” rear notch, .245” tall, flat back drafted surface (no distracting points, edges or serrations) with nominal 1/8” radii corners, hardened steel, black oxide finish, dovetail press fit and stainless set screw for back-up retention. Drift adjustable rear only. (Rear Sights NOT Sold Separately) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JaeOne3345 Posted November 18, 2012 Share Posted November 18, 2012 I used to run the Sevigny .115 front / .150 rear. I can't stand that much light. I switched to Dawson .125/.125 (yes, same notch width and front width) and I absolutely love it. I got the .205 height front, and matched it with the plain black fixed rear. I centered the rear in the notch a couple nights ago and shot it this morning at a match. Wonderful difference. Nice Bomar-ish sight picture. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DRAB81 Posted November 18, 2012 Share Posted November 18, 2012 (edited) Meat, Which sights are using exactly? Trying to see exactly which option you have. The below is from the web site. Glock Plain Black Sights Front Sight: .115” wide x .215” OR .245″ tall, serrations, black oxide finish, 3/16” hex screw retention. Rear Sight: .130” OR .150″ wide x .120” rear notch, .245” tall, flat back drafted surface (no distracting points, edges or serrations) with nominal 1/8” radii corners, hardened steel, black oxide finish, dovetail press fit and stainless set screw for back-up retention. Drift adjustable rear only. (Rear Sights NOT Sold Separately) I run the .150" notch rear, with .115" wide fronts on all my Glocks (front sight height varies from gun to gun. For this specific gun, I started with the Sevigny Competition Sight Set from CPWSA. My POI wasn't here it should be with the standard .215" tall front though. I used the DP calculation, and figured out I needed a .255" tall front for my gun, so I bought a DP .115 x .255 front. You can buy Sevigny rear sights at either website in the links below. http://www.dawsonprecision.com/ProductDetail.jsp?LISTID=800008E9-1212765497 http://www.cpwsa.com/warren_sevigny_sights.htm . Edited November 18, 2012 by MEAT Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheBoss Posted November 19, 2012 Share Posted November 19, 2012 +1 Dawson FO .105 front and Heinie rear. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk HD Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RANGER3BN Posted November 21, 2012 Share Posted November 21, 2012 I enjoy the sevigny/ warren combo on my G34. I purchased mine from Chris Patty and super quick shipping! yup +1 I went with the Dawson FO front though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
k1kelli Posted November 21, 2012 Share Posted November 21, 2012 another vote for warren/sevigny Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GMB Posted November 21, 2012 Share Posted November 21, 2012 Has anyone heard of Flatline sights, if so what are your thoughts on them. I am guessing they are new as I have not seen them before. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
garyg22 Posted November 21, 2012 Share Posted November 21, 2012 This is what I run on my G22 for matces. For a carry gun I would go with a 3 dot night site instead. Sevigny Competiton from Warren Tactical. I use a plain black front, others prefer a fiber front. What I like about them is that the rear is slightly undercut which really cuts down on any glare. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now