sperman

Topics Merged.

There was a big discussion here a few years ago on that topic. There was no clear answer. http://www.brianenos.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=132118

My request is that the Newsletter be a separate subscription from announcements by HQ. I've opted out of the newsletter, because it is of no interest to me. I fear that I have also opted out of all mailings from USPSA. (That is assuming that HQ will use this vehicle for announcing rules changes or other important information.)

Jay posted this on the Area 6 facebook page:

From the USPSA web site: Area 6 Jay Corn Area6@uspsa.org +1 727-410-0740

I was confused also.

He got the miss penalty, I thought that went without saying. He also got a procedural for 10.2.2.

At the Production Nationals last year, there was a stage that had 5 targets. COF was engage each target with 1 round, then perform a mandatory reload, then engage each target with 1 round. Shooter shot the first string, did the reload, engaged 2 targets and had a death jamb. After he got the gun back in action, he forgot about target 3, and engaged the last 2. John was called over and the ruling was 1 procedural for failure to follow WSB.

This is the closest thing I can find, from the USPSA by-laws:

I think he meant "one shot per string", not "one string" but he's DNROI and I'm just guessing, because his answer makes no sense.

Here is a link to the topic on the USPSA forums. http://www.uspsa.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=1216 I'm going to go ahead and close this thread.

I could care less about having the HHF published. Any 3rd grader with a calculator can figure them out. IMO, they are already published. What is important to me, is how they are calculated. We had some new classifiers published in 13. The HHF were WAY off. A few months later the HHF was changed, but we still don't know how the came up with the original or the revised HHF. There also seems to be some discrepancy in the setup of the stages at Nationals where (I assume) the HHF were set, and the stages published for use in the classifier system. It has been brought to the attention of the BOD, but we have had zero communication on the issue. I would also like to see some info on the contract to write the new USPSA web site. If I understand correctly, that work is being done by NiftyBytes. Every time someone complains about practiscore, all we here is that this is "free" software being written by volunteers. That "free" software may be the smartest investment Ken ever made. Why is a company with $2M in revenue not pro-actively hiring a company to write software to be exactly what they want, instead of waiting for volunteers to do that for them?

from the Nov 2010 BOD Meeting

I would leave out the sandbagging class winners, but how about inviting all section champions? That would get the numbers up.

I got that last night, and I agree, it is an excellent idea. Hopefully they can do something similar to communicate rules changes and the like.

Late 2007 http://steelchallenge.com/media/USPSA_aquires_SC.html Here is the tax return from 2007, but I don't know what I'm looking for. https://bulk.resource.org/irs.gov/eo/2008_11_EO/91-1325053_990_200712.pdf

It looks like the info at Guidestar goes back to 2008. When did USPSA buy steel challenge?

Does anyone know anything about the BOD meeting held last week? Since most of the meeting was in "executive session" the minutes are pretty sparse. http://www.uspsa.org/bodminutes/20140429.pdf

http://www.uspsa.org/uspsa-display-match-results-detail.php?indx=2805&division=Revolver&guntype=Pistol From Appendix A2 in the rulebook

With a big asterisk next to her revolver championship.

There is a long gravel road, but you could park at registration and I'm sure someone would give you a ride down to the bays.

When you are looking at the division results, and see "tie" it isn't that big a deal because you know where you placed. But when you get your e-mail summary from USPSA and it lists your position as "tie" it is a bit frustrating. Am I tied for 1st, tied for 201st? It would be nice if it showed (as in Bill's example above) Tie-50 or T50.

I edited the title of this topic to add a little clarity.

I haven't had time to do anything with it, so it is sitting in the safe.

I made the mount myself.