Jachin Posted May 6, 2009 Author Share Posted May 6, 2009 Well, it looks like the 147's should take a victory lap. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darrell Posted May 30, 2009 Share Posted May 30, 2009 My XD's didn't like 147 gr bullets. I switched to 124's and never looked back. I shoot 124 jhp from Precision Delta at 1.100 OAL behind 4.0 gr of Tightgroup for matches. For accuracy same bullet behind 5.4 of Power Pistol in my M&P, and 6.0 in my EAA limited. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darrell Posted May 30, 2009 Share Posted May 30, 2009 My XD's didn't like 147 gr bullets. I switched to 124's and never looked back. I shoot 124 jhp from Precision Delta at 1.100 OAL behind 4.0 gr of Tightgroup for matches. For accuracy same bullet behind 5.4 of Power Pistol in my M&P, and 6.0 in my EAA limited. Here's some XD data may save you some time and money Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shawn Knight Posted May 30, 2009 Share Posted May 30, 2009 WOW!!!! I have never met and XD9Tac that didn't love the 147 Zero HP with 3.3gr of titegroup. I have tried this in 4 different guns and had wonderful results. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SuperAWE Posted May 30, 2009 Share Posted May 30, 2009 147gr with Solo 1000 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
M109R Posted May 31, 2009 Share Posted May 31, 2009 160 hard cast for me with 2.7 grains of Solo 1000 for 130 pf it is so soft had to go to a 11# recoil spring to get the Glock 34 to run. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JorDanO Posted June 2, 2009 Share Posted June 2, 2009 I like the snappier feel of 124's over 147's. My current load is 125gr. Zero JHP, 4.7 gr. N340 at 1.085 OAL for my SP-01 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JoeGlocker Posted June 5, 2009 Share Posted June 5, 2009 I like 147 for the control. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UW Mitch Posted June 5, 2009 Share Posted June 5, 2009 I started shooting 124's, then went to 147 for that softer feel, but after a few thousand of them I switched back to 124s. I've settled on 124s because I liked the feel in recoil better. ~Mitch Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whiskey_Sauer Posted August 19, 2009 Share Posted August 19, 2009 So I take it that nobody uses 115 gr? This is the 9 mm ammo that seems to be most available, at least around here. And do these differences in weight affect scoring at all, at least for production division? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chbrow10 Posted August 19, 2009 Share Posted August 19, 2009 My son also uses 147 grain bullets, but for a different reason. Not trying to get scientific here, but if you compare the real scientific equation for kinetic entery to the simplyfied power factor equation, you'll see that the heavier bullet gives an advantage. This comes into play when trying to knock down steel, especially poppers. And if you pull the shot low, often a factory 115 gr bullet won't drop the popper, but the 147 does everytime. If you read the rules on how the poppers are calibrated, the 9mm has to hit the round area or HIGHER for it to be considered calibrated, right? Our load is 4.0 gr of w231 over berrys 147 plated. 138 PF out of a G34 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BayouSlide Posted August 19, 2009 Share Posted August 19, 2009 (edited) So I take it that nobody uses 115 gr? This is the 9 mm ammo that seems to be most available, at least around here.And do these differences in weight affect scoring at all, at least for production division? All the same diameter. The reason the lightest bullets, the 115 would tend to feel the snappiest is that they have to be loaded to the highest velocity of the three under discussion to make PF. I also feel the 147s might take down a popper a little better/faster than the lighter bullets. YMMV. Curtis Edited August 19, 2009 by BayouSlide Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whiskey_Sauer Posted August 19, 2009 Share Posted August 19, 2009 So I take it that nobody uses 115 gr? This is the 9 mm ammo that seems to be most available, at least around here.And do these differences in weight affect scoring at all, at least for production division? All the same diameter. [...] LOL at my question, I guess when I asked that question I didn't really understand scoring all that well. I see now that you either get classified as "major" or "minor" but that scoring is adjusted based on those two classifications. I guess the better question is, does factory 115 gr ammo ever fail to meet the minimum PF of 125 to qualify for a match? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sarge Posted August 20, 2009 Share Posted August 20, 2009 So I take it that nobody uses 115 gr? This is the 9 mm ammo that seems to be most available, at least around here.And do these differences in weight affect scoring at all, at least for production division? All the same diameter. [...] LOL at my question, I guess when I asked that question I didn't really understand scoring all that well. I see now that you either get classified as "major" or "minor" but that scoring is adjusted based on those two classifications. I guess the better question is, does factory 115 gr ammo ever fail to meet the minimum PF of 125 to qualify for a match? UMC and Blazer brass 115's both were right at 125pf when I tested them this week. That is just way to close. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flexmoney Posted August 20, 2009 Share Posted August 20, 2009 I think that the 125 power factor floor for Minor...happening to work out where factory 115g 9mm meets it...is no coincidence. Nobody will ever question your ammo at a local match if you are shooting factory 115g bullets. If you are going to major matches (state level and up), then you'd be wanting to check out all your gear ahead of time..including chrono'ing ammo through your gun. Feel free to buy 115g from local suppliers and have fun shooting your next match ! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bagdrag Posted August 20, 2009 Share Posted August 20, 2009 147gr for me. I remember using factory 115gr at some local matches and it not knocking down the steel. Never had that issue with my 147gr reloads (3.2-3.3gr of titegroup). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IHAVEGAS Posted August 27, 2015 Share Posted August 27, 2015 My son also uses 147 grain bullets, but for a different reason. Not trying to get scientific here, but if you compare the real scientific equation for kinetic entery to the simplyfied power factor equation, you'll see that the heavier bullet gives an advantage. This comes into play when trying to knock down steel, especially poppers. Kinetic Energy = 1/2 * mass * velocity * velocity 1/2 M V**2 By that the lightest bullets would be the best choice (if all bullets were loaded to the same power factor). I think how the energy of the bullet gets spent might be more of a factor. The heavier and slower bullet seems to push the steel a bit better and the light bullets seem to bounce off, or perhaps the lighter bullet energy gets spent in very rapid deformation ? If you think about hitting the steel with a very slow moving basketball versus something like a 17 hmr I think the principle is the same but just exaggerated. Old old thread, but I'm currently wondering about the same question (is there really a best bullet weight for steel if power factor is kept the same). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now