ddc Posted May 8, 2017 Share Posted May 8, 2017 Some more 16055 data… I've been reading up on Prima V and how lot 16055 is a bit slower than previous batches. I don't have any experience with any other batch numbers; 16055 is the only one I have. Tested two loads: 3.1 grains, 3.2 grains 3.1 was just short of minor power factor. 3.2 made minor but too close for comfort (for me anyway...) I'll try to get some data with 3.3 but it won't be for a week or probably two. I was not able to get any accuracy numbers; chrono data only. M&P 5” Core with an Apex semi-drop-in barrel. S&B SPP primers Blue Bullets 147 RN COL: 1.135 Chrono is a Competition Electronics Pro Chrono Digital Loaded on a 650. BB 147, 3.1, 1.135 Temperature: 50 Number of Shots: 14 Pressure: 30 Minimum: 824 Bullet Weight: 147 Maximum: 867 Power Factor Average: 123 Spread: 43 Power Factor Low: 121 Average: 843 Power Factor High: 127 Standard Deviation: 10 Shot List # Velocity Feet/Lbs Power Factor Date 14 851 236 125 5/7/17 2:32 PM 13 841 230 123 5/7/17 2:32 PM 12 843 231 123 5/7/17 2:32 PM 11 845 233 124 5/7/17 2:32 PM 10 838 229 123 5/7/17 2:31 PM 9 824 221 121 5/7/17 2:31 PM 8 845 233 124 5/7/17 2:31 PM 7 836 228 122 5/7/17 2:31 PM 6 852 236 125 5/7/17 2:31 PM 5 867 245 127 5/7/17 2:31 PM 4 830 224 122 5/7/17 2:31 PM 3 851 236 125 5/7/17 2:31 PM 2 847 234 124 5/7/17 2:31 PM 1 839 229 123 5/7/17 2:30 PM BB 147, 3.2, 1.135 Temperature: 50 Number of Shots: 9 Pressure: 30 Minimum: 851 Bullet Weight: 147 Maximum: 880 Power Factor Average: 126 Spread: 29 Power Factor Low: 125 Average: 863 Power Factor High: 129 Standard Deviation: 8 Shot List # Velocity Feet/Lbs Power Factor Date 9 858 240 126 5/7/17 2:36 PM 8 851 236 125 5/7/17 2:36 PM 7 867 245 127 5/7/17 2:36 PM 6 859 240 126 5/7/17 2:36 PM 5 864 243 127 5/7/17 2:36 PM 4 872 248 128 5/7/17 2:36 PM 3 859 240 126 5/7/17 2:35 PM 2 863 243 126 5/7/17 2:35 PM 1 880 252 129 5/7/17 2:35 PM Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mountbkr Posted May 8, 2017 Share Posted May 8, 2017 Everything i've seen says it burns clean, you agree? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ddc Posted May 8, 2017 Author Share Posted May 8, 2017 I've heard that also but I'll have to wait to comment until I shoot an entire session with just Prima V. In this particular session I followed up the chrono session with about 200 rounds from a different load. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ddc Posted May 27, 2017 Author Share Posted May 27, 2017 (edited) Finally got around to chrono 3.3 Prima V with Blue Bullets 147 RN. Same gun,press,etc. as before. Didn't have GPS turned on so no temp/pressure but it was in the low 70's. No serious accuracy testing but casual 10 shots to the head from about 10 yards did not indicate any obvious issues. Not sure why chrono only recorded 6 shots as I recall shooting 10 but... Really liked the spread and SD numbers. I see that as I've gone from 3.1 to 3.2 to 3.3 those numbers have declined with each increment. Prima V 3.3 Blue Bullets 147 RN Digital Link Temperature: N/A Number of Shots: 6 Pressure: N/A Minimum: 895 Bullet Weight: 147 Maximum: 900 Power Factor Average: 131 Spread: 5 Power Factor Low: 131 Average: 896 Power Factor High: 132 Standard Deviation: 2 Shot List # Velocity Feet/Lbs Power Factor Date 6 896 262 131 5/26/17 12:41 PM 5 895 261 131 5/26/17 12:41 PM 4 896 262 131 5/26/17 12:41 PM 3 900 264 132 5/26/17 12:40 PM 2 895 261 131 5/26/17 12:40 PM 1 896 262 131 5/26/17 12:40 PM Edited May 27, 2017 by ddc Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dwbsig Posted May 27, 2017 Share Posted May 27, 2017 I shot a few groups yesterday with the same batch of prima v with 147 acme flat points out of a G-34. I shot these groups at fifteen yards with chrono at about eight feet. Cci-500. Win brass prima v. 3.2 grs 147 fp. 1.135 oal 899.6 fps. Es 14. sd 4 8 shots 1.6" group same except 3.4grs prima v 935 fps. Es 17. sd 5. 8 shots 1.74" group I loaded some more at 3.2 grs with 1.15 oal and some at 3.1 grs with a1.135 oal and 1.15 oal hopefully I'll get to try them out next week. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gtaylor07 Posted May 27, 2017 Share Posted May 27, 2017 I am using an older batch, but can confirm very tight velocity spreads, especially on the upper end. Did a ladder this week and my last two loads with about 20 rounds probably half were in 5fps of each other, and most all of them in a 10fps window. For the first couple I actually through my chrono wasn't working. The number wasn't changing.... Sent from my Moto G (4) using Tapatalk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ddc Posted May 29, 2017 Author Share Posted May 29, 2017 On 5/27/2017 at 4:30 PM, gtaylor07 said: I am using an older batch, but can confirm very tight velocity spreads, especially on the upper end. Did a ladder this week and my last two loads with about 20 rounds probably half were in 5fps of each other, and most all of them in a 10fps window. For the first couple I actually through my chrono wasn't working. The number wasn't changing.... Sent from my Moto G (4) using Tapatalk Yes, very happy with the spread. The question was asked earlier about "does it burn clean?". Today was my first extended experience with the load, used it in a match, around 180 rounds. I do believe it is cleaner than the other loads that I have used for 9mm minor (which I should note have all been with slower powders, WSF, Silhouette, True Blue, none of which is considered ideal for that application) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MemphisMechanic Posted May 29, 2017 Share Posted May 29, 2017 On 5/8/2017 at 1:07 PM, Mountbkr said: Everything i've seen says it burns clean, you agree? I was the loudest voice saying that amongst the early Prima V adopters. I officially rescind that opinion with another 2,000 rounds downrange: it's nowhere near as clean as N320. About as nasty as titegroup, actually. The difference is that Prima V leaves only a sooty deposit inside the gun that takes only a shot of aerosol cleaner to remove. No scrubbing and scrubbing required like Titegroup. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mountbkr Posted May 29, 2017 Share Posted May 29, 2017 I was the loudest voice saying that amongst the early Prima V adopters. I officially rescind that opinion with another 2,000 rounds downrange: it's nowhere near as clean as N320. About as nasty as titegroup, actually. The difference is that Prima V leaves only a sooty deposit inside the gun that takes only a shot of aerosol cleaner to remove. No scrubbing and scrubbing required like Titegroup. Good to see an update from regular use. I'll spend the extra for N320 if that's the case Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gtaylor07 Posted May 29, 2017 Share Posted May 29, 2017 Only used Unique and Bullseye before, and as you can guess far cleaner than those, and burns much cooler as well. If you need something cleaner and are willing to spend double to get it go for it, but I would never call Prima V dirty. Sent from my Moto G (4) using Tapatalk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RAP Posted May 30, 2017 Share Posted May 30, 2017 I'm switching from VV N320 to Prima V. My groups are better and it's not what I consider a dirty powder like Tightgroup or Unique. Is it as clean as N320, almost. The better accuracy and feels as soft as N320 is plenty of reasons for me to phase out VV powder. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mountbkr Posted May 30, 2017 Share Posted May 30, 2017 I'm switching from VV N320 to Prima V. My groups are better and it's not what I consider a dirty powder like Tightgroup or Unique. Is it as clean as N320, almost. The better accuracy and feels as soft as N320 is plenty of reasons for me to phase out VV powder. Sent from my iPad using TapatalkThanks for the feedbackSent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fantom919 Posted May 30, 2017 Share Posted May 30, 2017 (edited) How are you guys getting this powder to meter evenly over a long loading session? I will agree that it probably has the best SD at times from my chrono data but over 100 rounds, it varies .10 gr. Right now I end up mixing the powder and adjusting if necessary to stay within a +/- .05 gr range. I notice that if I don't kind of stir the powder around after 100, the larger pieces gravitate to the top and the smaller ones make it to the bottom. This causes inconsistency over time. Is anyone else seeing this large of a shift? Edited May 30, 2017 by Fantom919 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MemphisMechanic Posted May 30, 2017 Share Posted May 30, 2017 I honestly had not noticed that, if it is happening to me. I'll try to pay more attention. I don't personally put any value on dropping a single charge onto the scale at any point, so I don't stop and pull weights during a reloading session: I take a ten drop average at the beginning, and I keep my powder measure completely full at all times. It never gets emptied. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B_RAD Posted May 30, 2017 Share Posted May 30, 2017 3 hours ago, Fantom919 said: How are you guys getting this powder to meter evenly over a long loading session? I will agree that it probably has the best SD at times from my chrono data but over 100 rounds, it varies .10 gr. Right now I end up mixing the powder and adjusting if necessary to stay within a +/- .05 gr range. I notice that if I don't kind of stir the powder around after 100, the larger pieces gravitate to the top and the smaller ones make it to the bottom. This causes inconsistency over time. Is anyone else seeing this large of a shift? I throw and dump about 10-20 before loading. Then load and measure shoot one every 50 rounds. Never habe the problem you're describing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RAP Posted May 30, 2017 Share Posted May 30, 2017 I've never had that problem either. I throw 10-20 powder drops and take the average. If good I start loading and will check every 100-200 rounds to make sure nothing's changed.Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RAP Posted May 30, 2017 Share Posted May 30, 2017 I've never had that problem either. I throw 10-20 powder drops and take the average. If good I start loading and will check every 100-200 rounds to make sure nothing's changed.Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B_RAD Posted May 30, 2017 Share Posted May 30, 2017 I've found that the first 20 throws is a little off. Maybe a tenth higher than what onset it for. But after the 20 dumps then it's consistent. I test one or two per hundred. Just for piece of mind. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fantom919 Posted May 30, 2017 Share Posted May 30, 2017 I'll try not stirring the powder around for a few 100 and see what it looks like. When I use titegroup I have a hair clipper zip tied to the powder tube and that has helped with consistent throws. With this powder it vibrates so the big and small pieces are separated (fairly obvious) so I turned it off. Ever since I've noticed that, I've been a bit more observant of how the powder settles over time. I also keep my powder full between 50 to 75 precent. Maybe I'll try between 75 and 100 for a run and see. Thanks for the feedback everyone. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
4n2t0 Posted May 30, 2017 Share Posted May 30, 2017 I'm surprised you needed the hair clipper with Titegroup, it throws very consistently for me out of my 650 without any additional help. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fantom919 Posted May 30, 2017 Share Posted May 30, 2017 23 minutes ago, 4n2t0 said: I'm surprised you needed the hair clipper with Titegroup, it throws very consistently for me out of my 650 without any additional help. Haha actually I used it for unique and red dot since they were flake powders and just kept using it for TG. I guess I could try without it but I figure if it ain't broke don't fix it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now