Jump to content
Brian Enos's Forums... Maku mozo!

Zeroing a C-More


Chris Leong

Recommended Posts

I made a couple of these graphs after reading this thread. I really like visual representation of data, and thought this would help people pick the dot size and zero distance that is best for them. As noted in the spreadsheet, I created the data for a Hornady HAP 121gr .355 bullet at 1470 fps. That's a little hot, at about 177 pf. I'll make a new one, if requested, using a different bullet and/or velocity. I need the BC, bullet weight, and velocity. I had to guess at the dot height above the barrel, so if you want a custom graph, measure that too. Also, this chart assumes that you zero at the CENTER of the dot. I can adjust that too, but haven't bothered yet.

Can everyone understand the graph's meaning, or should I provide further description?

post-985-1223056085_thumb.jpg

Edited by Jeff686
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 104
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

For HSSMITH. I used a BC of .118 that I found for a 115gr JHP bullet. It wasn't Zero, but it must be close.

EDIT: with higher res graph

EDIT2: thought there was a missing trace, but with this BC/Velocity the 25yd zero and 50yd zero are almost identical.

post-985-1223066632_thumb.jpg

Edited by Jeff686
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I made a couple of these graphs after reading this thread. I really like visual representation of data, and thought this would help people pick the dot size and zero distance that is best for them. As noted in the spreadsheet, I created the data for a Hornady HAP 121gr .355 bullet at 1470 fps. That's a little hot, at about 177 pf. I'll make a new one, if requested, using a different bullet and/or velocity. I need the BC, bullet weight, and velocity. I had to guess at the dot height above the barrel, so if you want a custom graph, measure that too. Also, this chart assumes that you zero at the CENTER of the dot. I can adjust that too, but haven't bothered yet.

Can everyone understand the graph's meaning, or should I provide further description?

Wow Jeff. Thank you!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Can everyone understand the graph's meaning, or should I provide further description?

Excellent presentation Jeff!

Now for all us techno-weenies out there, what program did you use for the graphics?

Thanks.

Bill

Hi Bill,

I used an online ballistics calculator for the data in the curves, then just made some tables and graphs using Excel 2007.

I'll upload the spreadsheets on Monday, if you want a copy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Bill,

I used an online ballistics calculator for the data in the curves, then just made some tables and graphs using Excel 2007.

I'll upload the spreadsheets on Monday, if you want a copy.

Jeff,

Looks like I finally have justification to upgrade my old Excel (Small Office 2002). If convenient, I would like copies of the file.

Thanks.

Bill

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jeff,

can you do mine please..here is the details..Bullet frontier CMJ 124grain RN .356, chronoed HI -1425 LO- 1387 PF 168 to 174 my Cmore dot 8MOA then I measured the height from the bore center to the Cmore dot about +/- 2.3 to 2.4inches.

Thanks

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Bill,

I used an online ballistics calculator for the data in the curves, then just made some tables and graphs using Excel 2007.

I'll upload the spreadsheets on Monday, if you want a copy.

Jeff,

Looks like I finally have justification to upgrade my old Excel (Small Office 2002). If convenient, I would like copies of the file.

Thanks.

Bill

You can do the same thing in 2002. I'll save a copy in 2002 format. I'm not sure how it will look, the colors might be off. You just have to know your way around Excel graphing features.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jeff,

can you do mine please..here is the details..Bullet frontier CMJ 124grain RN .356, chronoed HI -1425 LO- 1387 PF 168 to 174 my Cmore dot 8MOA then I measured the height from the bore center to the Cmore dot about +/- 2.3 to 2.4inches.

Thanks

Yep, but not till Monday...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Attempting to upload excel spreadsheets. XLS files are not allowed, had to zip them up.

One is in Office 2007 (original).

One is in Office 2003 (compatibility mode, with unknown status of graphs).

Good evening Jeff,

Downloaded the Office 2003 version and it looks wicked.

Thanks so much.

Bill

Edited to add: On the conversion to Excel 2003, the range changed from 0 to 100 yards to 0 to 20 yards. I haven't quite figured it out but should be an easy fix.

Edited by Flatland Shooter
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
  • 5 months later...

Not me, I like the 25 yard zero as it's easy to zero at the range then for a 25 to 50 yd shot it's right on [or close enough]. You just have to remember you are 1 1/4 inches low at about 6 feet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mine hits inside the 6 moa dot now from 10 yards to almost 50. 3 yards center upper A aim gets you an A, as does the same aiming point at 50 yards. Details available in a couple weeks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mine hits inside the 6 moa dot now from 10 yards to almost 50. 3 yards center upper A aim gets you an A, as does the same aiming point at 50 yards. Details available in a couple weeks.

+1 for that. The same for me and my zero with 6MOA dot. I was at a match last weekend with some 3meter targets it worked very well for me there..

DVC Benjamin

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you guys would just use the Quinn mount it would get you dot closer to your center of bore and trajectory would be less of an issue. :P

This is way easier than discerning the proper battle range zero for a rifle when hold over/under to maximum effective range and point blank analysis is concerned. Now THAT debate would make Einsteins head hurt!

I zero the dot @ 15 yards and confirm impact at 30 and 3.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you guys would just use the Quinn mount it would get you dot closer to your center of bore and trajectory would be less of an issue. :P

This is way easier than discerning the proper battle range zero for a rifle when hold over/under to maximum effective range and point blank analysis is concerned. Now THAT debate would make Einsteins head hurt!

I zero the dot @ 15 yards and confirm impact at 30 and 3.

That is what I like about the Barry mount. Low mounted dot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Zero your gun for the hardest shots you will have to make. That is not usually the 3 yd head shot thru the port!!!

Reminds me of an Area match I was shooting when my dot went TU on me and I borrowed a friends gun for the next stage. He failed to tell me he had sighted the Cmore railway on top of a weigand frame mount for the 3 yd head shots with no shoots under on the stage. This stage started out with PPs at 25 and 35, after several shots thankfully staying within the berm but very high I figured it out and aimed under the popper and finally took them down and got to move down to those real hard 3yd head shots. Between his built in flinch, super high mounted dot, and 3 yd zero I think it was shooting 2 ft high at 35!! Always bring a back up gun and have it in your bag with you on stage!!

The other point is the longer range you set your gun up for the more accurate your zero is. You can't completely depend on charts because they are assuming a perfect zero. So zero at close range if you just have to but check it at longer distances because it could easily look fine but shoot 2 or 3 inches off windage wise at the longer distance when you NEED to be right on. But I'm forgetting that USPSA is a 15 yd max game now. :D:o

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...