38supPat Posted July 9, 2002 Share Posted July 9, 2002 Quote: from MBneACP on 9:16 pm on July 8, 2002 Okay Shooter Grrl! I haven't been this popular since I said range officers would always be secondary to shooters! Your adoring fan... MB Lol....say that to IPSC world body, or better yet IROA...lmao...there'd be a stoning....current policy is more like everybody is secondary to RO..(especially the "professional" RO types, you know who you are...still remember which end of the gun to hold?) Pat Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shooter Grrl Posted July 10, 2002 Author Share Posted July 10, 2002 Quote: Your adoring fan... I have A fan - how cool is that :-) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nik Habicht Posted July 11, 2002 Share Posted July 11, 2002 Quote: from Shooter Grrl on 4:58 pm on July 10, 2002 Quote: Your adoring fan... I have A fan - how cool is that :-) Kath, You tell us. Since CA is in a heatwave though, does he really help to cool things down? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shooter Grrl Posted July 11, 2002 Author Share Posted July 11, 2002 Silly Nik - of course he doesn't - but it's still nice to have an "adoring fan". But... with this heatwave, an oscillating one would be WAY BETTER Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nik Habicht Posted July 11, 2002 Share Posted July 11, 2002 At least you figured out that it was (supposed to be) a joke.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shooter Grrl Posted July 11, 2002 Author Share Posted July 11, 2002 Had ya worried huh? Just remember, I'm not really a blonde, I only act like one sometimes (most of the time?!?) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nik Habicht Posted July 11, 2002 Share Posted July 11, 2002 Carol generalizes that other people gotta get used to my sense of humor and know me to understand that I'm trying to be funny...... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shooter Grrl Posted September 5, 2002 Author Share Posted September 5, 2002 I'm at it again - this time I'm taking on Woolley and his idiotic statements about how to "escalate issues" through the chain of command at a match. He also had the nerve to call us whiners and one guy sent an off list message to me telling me I needed to "grow up" :-) But alas, there's been no more responses - they're scared!!!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nik Habicht Posted September 5, 2002 Share Posted September 5, 2002 Kath, Or they've had enough therapy to know when "not to engage....." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shooter Grrl Posted September 5, 2002 Author Share Posted September 5, 2002 Therapy?!?! HA HA HA HA HA - That's funny Nik. As if!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nik Habicht Posted September 6, 2002 Share Posted September 6, 2002 Oh, wait, I forgot, you did say IPSC list...... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gm iprod Posted September 6, 2002 Share Posted September 6, 2002 I think too many of them are typing with one hand. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shooter Grrl Posted September 17, 2002 Author Share Posted September 17, 2002 I'm at 'em again - here's todays attempt to rile them: So I've noticed that 99% of the discussions (arguments?) we engage in on this list are based on the assumption that shooters will cheat any time they're given a chance.... Sorry folks, but I got a problem with that assumption!!!!! Most of the shooters I know will GAME, but they certainly will not cheat nor blatantly violate a rule - why do y'all think otherwise? Why do y'all spend so much time defining and defending situations that will never occur? Kath Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shooter Grrl Posted September 19, 2002 Author Share Posted September 19, 2002 Damn - they didn't take the bait!!! Generated one response that said "I agree with you" Doh! Gotta try harder next time Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shred Posted November 3, 2002 Share Posted November 3, 2002 Ok SG, I've got 'em all riled up with "a flashlight could put you in Open".. How about somebody drop a 9mm-Major discussion in to boot? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
38supPat Posted November 3, 2002 Share Posted November 3, 2002 Why not try telling them that now that so many guns come from the factory with comp/ports, they should be allowed in stock class. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shooter Grrl Posted February 20, 2004 Author Share Posted February 20, 2004 My life just isn't exciting enough these days - so I'm at 'em again over on the IPSC list... Wish me luck guys, hopefully someone will want to "engage" this time around Here's what I wrote... Uh, HELLO JOE - get a clue please. This is the UNOFFICIAL IPSC LIST. Had you bothered checking either of the official sites, www.uspsa.org or www.ipsc.org say, last OCTOBER - you would have seen the new rules. Prior to the vote of the IPSC GA in October, the drafts were posted and updated regularly on both of these sites as well. And don't even get me started on the "shoulda sent" statement!!!!! Take some responsibility please Shooter Grrl In response to this drivel -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: Ipsc-bounces@ipsclist.org [mailto:Ipsc-bounces@ipsclist.org] On Behalf Of smokinj38 Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2004 1:34 PM To: ipsc newsletter Subject: [ipsc] re:get a life criss, this is just one of the rules we heard about, how about the "no tool to clear a jam" rule. how many others have been changed that we have no idea about. if nothing else, the proposed changes should have been sent, at the very least, to the ro's, cro's, range masters, and stats people to see if they were even remotely possoble without causeing a complete "cluster" in the first year of enactment. joe(explitives left out this time)blazek. enyone can play the middle name game. after all, this is a game, right? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shred Posted February 22, 2004 Share Posted February 22, 2004 I just don't understand how what seems like the four remaining active subscribers to the IPSC list can get all riled up about something the cooler heads here have known about for months and could pretty much care less about. Who can tell me the last time 3 or more no-shoots were scored on a single target at a USPSA nationals? World shoot? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vince Pinto Posted February 22, 2004 Share Posted February 22, 2004 Kath, You have no idea how much I regret responding to a request to send a post to the unofficial IPSC List/Digest (through the kind assistance of Rob Boudrie) concerning this week's "The sky is falling" brouhaha over the maximum two hits per penalty target. Apparently this revised rule will cause the complete collapse of IPSC shooting, a rise in global warming and a massive shift in the time/space continuum. Anyway, it won't happen again, and I'll punish myself by going to bed tonight without my usual serving of milk 'n' cookies And, once again, thank you Mr. Enos for giving us a venue where people with cooler heads and open minds can discuss matters of mutual interest in a friendly and constructive manner. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kimel Posted February 22, 2004 Share Posted February 22, 2004 Aw heck Vince, give yourself an extra ration of medicinal rum to go with the cookies instead. We all appreciate all you do for us...even if some folks elsewhere don't. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rhino Posted February 22, 2004 Share Posted February 22, 2004 I still like Rob B.'s unofficial ipsc list and I appreciate that he's worked hard to keep it available to us for so long. I still like and respect most of the people on there. I am one of them and I was there for several years before I came here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shred Posted February 22, 2004 Share Posted February 22, 2004 Yeah, I'm not putting down the list and all Rob's efforts in keeping it going by any means (I have my own little Texas IPSC list and that's plenty enough work), but sometimes it seems to devolve into a protracted chat/rant session between a few vocal people that has little use to most everybody else. I bet Rob sees the number of 'unsubscribe' requests shoot up every time something flames up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
George Posted February 22, 2004 Share Posted February 22, 2004 I signed up for the (unofficial) IPSC list middle of last year, spent a few sessions perusing it, set up a mail handling rule to stuff the e-mails in their own folder and promptly forgot about it. Just checked and found 865 e-mails waiting to be waded through. Anyone out there wanna' get up to speed and have them all forwarded to you, raise your hand, I'm not looking in that folder for love, or money -- Regards, Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now