A62335 Posted March 9, 2010 Share Posted March 9, 2010 Anyone have any firsthand knowledge of how an aluminum frame 1911 holds up to the softer-than-factory 165PF of USPSA and IDPA? I've got a rather pricey aluminum-framed 1911 on the way, and would like to shoot it regularly at IDPA matches since it will be my everyday CCW gun. But, I'll stick with my steel-framed guns if the aluminum frame will not hold up to a steady diet of 165PF reloads. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RH45 Posted March 10, 2010 Share Posted March 10, 2010 Anyone have any firsthand knowledge of how an aluminum frame 1911 holds up to the softer-than-factory 165PF of USPSA and IDPA? I've got a rather pricey aluminum-framed 1911 on the way, and would like to shoot it regularly at IDPA matches since it will be my everyday CCW gun. But, I'll stick with my steel-framed guns if the aluminum frame will not hold up to a steady diet of 165PF reloads. I would think that if the pistol is fitted properly, you shouldn't have any problems. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
juan Posted March 10, 2010 Share Posted March 10, 2010 my son runs a kimber tac 2 40,000 rnds no battering Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
juan Posted March 10, 2010 Share Posted March 10, 2010 I hit add reply to soon. all major loads at 170 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MTBfarms Posted March 10, 2010 Share Posted March 10, 2010 I think the modern aluminum frames hold up very well. About all manufactures make them. I have an early model 39 S&W that the old time I bought it off of told me he was afraid to shoot aluminum guns of that era. Several guys at gun shows have told me that about older guns, but not of new ones. Shoot that light blaster. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steel1212 Posted March 10, 2010 Share Posted March 10, 2010 Also remember these guns where made to handle factory loads. 165PF isn't factory by quite a bit so it would be actually seeing less abuse than if you where shooting a steady diet of factory loads through it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MTBfarms Posted March 10, 2010 Share Posted March 10, 2010 Also remember these guns where made to handle factory loads. 165PF isn't factory by quite a bit so it would be actually seeing less abuse than if you where shooting a steady diet of factory loads through it. That is correct. 165 is way softer than most defensive rounds. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
A62335 Posted March 10, 2010 Author Share Posted March 10, 2010 Thanks guys. I realize that 165PF is softer than factory. However, most people don't put the amount of rounds downrange that we do. So, even though our ammo may be softer, the significantly greater round count that our guns are subjected to might wash out the reduced wear effects of softer ammo, hence my question. I think I'll just shoot it whenever I feel the desire too, and if I run into any problems then I'll deal with them as the come. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steel1212 Posted March 10, 2010 Share Posted March 10, 2010 If pistol manufactures can't make the gun to be shot, then they shouldn't make the gun. If it gets beat up send it back and tell them a gun is a tool that is ment to be used...make it RIGHT! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
A62335 Posted March 10, 2010 Author Share Posted March 10, 2010 Corey, I completely agree with you. Only reason I posted this is because the gun in question will be 1 of 15 in a limited run of guns, and I am hesitant to subject it to a super high round count, even if the ammo is downloaded. But, I think I'm just gonna shoot it anyways. No safe queens for me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Loves2Shoot Posted March 10, 2010 Share Posted March 10, 2010 If pistol manufactures can't make the gun to be shot, then they shouldn't make the gun. If it gets beat up send it back and tell them a gun is a tool that is ment to be used...make it RIGHT! LOL. Most guns don't get shot more than a few hundred rounds I would be willing to venture but I agree with the sentiment. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rrflyer Posted March 10, 2010 Share Posted March 10, 2010 I thought the big problem with aluminum framed guns was with the older style DEVIL mag followers that would chew up the feedramp area. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MichiganShootist Posted March 10, 2010 Share Posted March 10, 2010 There is a lot of information in a at least a half dozen threads over at the 1911 forum on this topic. The vast majority of the aluminum "gun" problems reported seem to be feed ramp related not frame problems. Mags with a poly follower and using FMJs rather than JHPs seem to be the primary ways to avoid the problems. If worst comes to worst a steel feed ramp can be installed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Merlin Orr Posted March 10, 2010 Share Posted March 10, 2010 I guess I will be the sole voice of dissent.... I have seen a couple of alum. framed guns with the mag release hole through the frame so wallowed out the mag release will not hold properly. IMO the Alum framed guns shoot loose a lot quicker also. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MTBfarms Posted March 10, 2010 Share Posted March 10, 2010 I guess I will be the sole voice of dissent.... I have seen a couple of alum. framed guns with the mag release hole through the frame so wallowed out the mag release will not hold properly. IMO the Alum framed guns shoot loose a lot quicker also. Were those newer or older guns that did that? What decade of manufacture? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Merlin Orr Posted March 10, 2010 Share Posted March 10, 2010 One was a Colt Commander from the (I am guessing) 80s. The other I don't remember the details. My personal VIP type alum frame seemed to loosen up quickly with hardball ammo. (.45). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MTBfarms Posted March 10, 2010 Share Posted March 10, 2010 That is along the lines of what I have heard. I agree with steel1212. I would think the manufactures will stand behind their products nowadays. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-JQ- Posted March 10, 2010 Share Posted March 10, 2010 Corey, I completely agree with you. Only reason I posted this is because the gun in question will be 1 of 15 in a limited run of guns, OK now you have to spill the beans on what 1911 you are talking about...and pics when she lands. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mgood Posted March 10, 2010 Share Posted March 10, 2010 1 of only 15, and I'd be tempted to put that baby away and not shoot it. But you say no safe queens for you. Ok, I probably wouldn't buy a gun I didn't intend to shoot. Shoot that puppy. If you wear it out, well, by then you'll be wanting something else anyway. BTW, I shoot an aluminum frame 1911 in USPSA. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MTBfarms Posted March 11, 2010 Share Posted March 11, 2010 Lets see that Rare piece. Please... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JeffCSR Posted March 11, 2010 Share Posted March 11, 2010 Would you guys recommend a Cominolli Frame Saver in an alloy framed 1911? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
juan Posted March 11, 2010 Share Posted March 11, 2010 EARLIER i SAID 40,000 RNDS ON A ALLOY FRAME 14 pound recoil spring no shock buff all major loads no frame battering sorry for the yelling caps lock Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steel1212 Posted March 11, 2010 Share Posted March 11, 2010 If pistol manufactures can't make the gun to be shot, then they shouldn't make the gun. If it gets beat up send it back and tell them a gun is a tool that is ment to be used...make it RIGHT! LOL. Most guns don't get shot more than a few hundred rounds I would be willing to venture but I agree with the sentiment. Yeah, I know I'm probably be unrealistic but its how I think. They make the dang things to shoot bullets. My job is to shoot bullets through the dang thing. It should be able to do so with out coming apart. I guess if they think we shoot to much they should have a round counter on there and a limit lol. Corey, I completely agree with you. Only reason I posted this is because the gun in question will be 1 of 15 in a limited run of guns, and I am hesitant to subject it to a super high round count, even if the ammo is downloaded. But, I think I'm just gonna shoot it anyways. No safe queens for me. Ok well let me put it in a different perspective. If you have to ask the question, then don't you already have your answer? I think in the back of your mind your worried about damaging a irreplaceable gun. I know for a fact I wouldn't compete with a 1 of 15 gun. Buy a run of the mill Springer loaded and have a few mods done and shoot the snot out of it. Remember we don't shoot guns we wear them out! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brian Gonsalves Posted March 11, 2010 Share Posted March 11, 2010 (edited) I guess I will be the sole voice of dissent.... I have seen a couple of alum. framed guns with the mag release hole through the frame so wallowed out the mag release will not hold properly. IMO the Alum framed guns shoot loose a lot quicker also. I've seen the same thing on an Aluminum frame Kimber. Mag falls out about the 2nd or 3rd round fired. Edited March 11, 2010 by Brian Gonsalves Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
G-ManBart Posted March 11, 2010 Share Posted March 11, 2010 Also remember these guns where made to handle factory loads. 165PF isn't factory by quite a bit so it would be actually seeing less abuse than if you where shooting a steady diet of factory loads through it. True, but there's a good chance that it will need a lighter recoil spring in it to get the gun to run properly. If it's got a lighter spring, balanced to the ammo, it can have a similar slide speed to the heavier ammo with a heavier spring, and that's where most of the wear will come from. R, Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now