f2benny

Yes they just came out last week Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk

Springer comes through again. 13lb spring in. Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk

Possibly. But I can't count the number of guys using n320 and 147s for minimal pf loads. Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk

Link to video? Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk

Another pleased RHT owner Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk

I have a 13 in my fs. Runs fine. Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk

First observations of my x5. First it will not function with my 130 pf 147 grain loads. It stove piped repeatedly. I took the Springer guide rod and 14lb recoil spring out of my fs and installed it. It was too short but it worked for a couple mags. The sights were off by 6 inches too high at 10 yards. Windage was fine. The trigger is decent. Not much better than my stock fs curved trigger. I compared my x5 to another x5 which was equiped with a pelt trigger installed in house by GG. I was surprised to find that the GG trigger seemed a bit mushy in comparison. It was definitely lighter but did not feel better overall to me. Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk

That's what I thought. Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk

Are you using a GG guide rod front a full size? I don't think the x5 version is out yet as far as I know. Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk

Can I be rude and ask about the cost? That looks great. Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk

How can a dvc be legal? It has over 4.25 barrel and it has no bushing? Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk

Just checked. It's there w.o. magwell. Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk

It's been on the production list for a couple of weeks I think. Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk

Yikes. Now I see the ridiculousness. Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk

The CZC hammer is legal when last I heard the cgw was not. I did not mean to suggest Cajun was a factory shop. Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk

How is that incorrect? As I understood the ruling the cz custom shadow hammer was allowed as a replacement because czc is a factory shop. Please explain the ruling if this is wrong. Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk

The cz hammer issue is different because it is a factory shop hammer that is standard on a production gun. This is truly aftermarket with a new exception being created which creates the confusion. The lack of an official ruling is making people question it. Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk

The similar shape and weight analysis comes from GG site. Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk

True Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk

Weigh it and see. I bet it's 44 oz. They seem a bit variable in weight too. My buddy has an aluminum Dawson mag well and GI rod and he is right at the limit. Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk

Well I have bad news maybe. That is a 9mm Trojan and it was over weight with a flgr. It has a steel Ed Brown msh and well. I put a Wilson plug and GI rod in to get to that weight. The 9mm is tight on weight! Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk

Just like mine Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk

The CZC parts exception may be behind the logic but that's a factory shop. I'd like that you be the basis so I could use the gg trigger in ssp too but right now it's all rumors. Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk

I agree. It's blatantly illegal by production rules but somehow it's ok. Glock aftermarket triggers like Vanek bump you right out of production but somehow this is ok? I can't imagine it shirt of outright shenanigans. Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk

Thanks Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk