Bigbadaboom Posted May 25, 2006 Share Posted May 25, 2006 Same thing only different. A link to this thread will be E-mailed to all Area Directors and Mike Voigt. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Musky Hunter Posted May 25, 2006 Share Posted May 25, 2006 keep it...i just bought one just for USPSA. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
norbs007 Posted May 25, 2006 Share Posted May 25, 2006 I'm just about to order one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bigbadaboom Posted May 25, 2006 Author Share Posted May 25, 2006 For the person who voted "What's a DOH?" Blade-Tech makes the "Dropped and Offset Holster" pictured below. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nemo Posted May 25, 2006 Share Posted May 25, 2006 and for the IDPA crossover, Blade-Tech also offers their Stingray attachment separately. Change belt attachment and you have an IDPA legal holster. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tman33_99 Posted May 25, 2006 Share Posted May 25, 2006 I thought DOH was what was said when you realized you hit a no-shoot Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bobert1 Posted May 25, 2006 Share Posted May 25, 2006 I am curious what reasons those who selected to outlaw the DOH are. I thought it was made for shooters just like me. Long arms and a spare tire. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GeorgeInNePa Posted May 25, 2006 Share Posted May 25, 2006 Enough with change this, change that. Someone elses gear is not what is beating you. Leave the DOH legal for Production. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eager Posted May 25, 2006 Share Posted May 25, 2006 Sorry, I voted to loose it. I was about ready to buy one to keep up with the technology race, then I thought of what I perceive as the intent of Production (and my intent of training for real carry situations), about how much time differeence it wouldn't make anyway, and how good it would be to avoid the whole issue especially if a ruling were made against it after I bought one, and I decided to go with a belt holster. I'm happy with my regular belt holster. Sorry. We don't have IDPA around here so I try to tailor my training/competition to real life defense encounters as much as possible. I could see women wanting it if they thought it was a viable carry holster. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Baier Posted May 25, 2006 Share Posted May 25, 2006 Whether you like them or not is irrelvent. They are and have been allowed for use in production. next topic please. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JakeMartens Posted May 25, 2006 Share Posted May 25, 2006 Sorry, I voted to loose it. I was about ready to buy one to keep up with the technology race, then I thought of what I perceive as the intent of Production (and my intent of training for real carry situations), about how much time differeence it wouldn't make anyway, and how good it would be to avoid the whole issue especially if a ruling were made against it after I bought one, and I decided to go with a belt holster. I'm happy with my regular belt holster. Sorry. We don't have IDPA around here so I try to tailor my training/competition to real life defense encounters as much as possible. I could see women wanting it if they thought it was a viable carry holster. If you want to train for self defense then you should spend your money and go and take some self defense training classes like Gunsite and ThunderRanch. Shooting these matches should not be considered training. You can consider it trigger time, learning your weapon, but not training. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GeorgeInNePa Posted May 25, 2006 Share Posted May 25, 2006 Sorry, I voted to loose it. I was about ready to buy one to keep up with the technology race, then I thought of what I perceive as the intent of Production (and my intent of training for real carry situations), about how much time differeence it wouldn't make anyway, and how good it would be to avoid the whole issue especially if a ruling were made against it after I bought one, and I decided to go with a belt holster. I'm happy with my regular belt holster. Sorry. We don't have IDPA around here so I try to tailor my training/competition to real life defense encounters as much as possible. I could see women wanting it if they thought it was a viable carry holster. So you decided to not get one and the rest of us shouldn't be able to use it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Musky Hunter Posted May 25, 2006 Share Posted May 25, 2006 just received mine...awesom holster. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bigbadaboom Posted May 25, 2006 Author Share Posted May 25, 2006 USPSA / IPSC shooting is competitive sport shooting. It is not a training exercise. The "Idea" of production division was to allow Joe Blow to get into the sport on the cheap and be competitive. It was not designed to replace IDPA. The DOHolster is, IMHO, a "Less expensive" holster. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Larry White Posted May 26, 2006 Share Posted May 26, 2006 I think all this started when they decided to combine the SS nats with the SSA match and SSA doesent allow the DOH. I havent heard or read a word about production. I bet its much ado about nothing.------Larry Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EricW Posted May 26, 2006 Share Posted May 26, 2006 There's no option for me: I don't own one, but I care about the issue. I'm tired of my fellow shooters taking it up the a$$ because of a whiny crybaby vocal minority in USPSA. If you can't take the heat, go shoot cowboy action. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JD McDorce Posted May 26, 2006 Share Posted May 26, 2006 I don't see any reason to single out the Blade-Tech DOH. Competitor Equipment has to comply with the applicable rules (i.e. 5.2.5; 5.2.7; App US D9 10, 12, & 23). If the issue is the 50mm rule, that becomes a function of the holster and the anatomy of the competitor. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris Keen Posted May 26, 2006 Share Posted May 26, 2006 No reason to ban somethign that only gives minor advantages, and is only used 7-10 times in a match. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flexmoney Posted May 26, 2006 Share Posted May 26, 2006 This one is closed too. Enough with the name calling. EVerybody is entitled to their opinion. They don't need to get brow beat for it on this forum. CLOSED (at least, for now) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts