Jump to content
Brian Enos's Forums... Maku mozo!

Short shooters with long shotgun tubes


Recommended Posts

This weekend I watched a vertically challenged shooter who was running a rather long shotgun tube, it probably held 12-13 rounds. The person had a slight fumble with the gun getting caught as it was pulled from the barrel, then drug the tube along the ground for some distance while loading a with the load 2 technique. It was not a glamorous performance but they managed to keep the firearm under control.

At the time the thought crossed my mind, would that be considered a dropped gun since it hit the ground?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would say not if they were still holding the gun, just touching the ground is not dropping.

As long as no other safety violations occurred dragging your gun on the ground is no problem . Now if the shooter pulled the gun out of the barrel and lost control of it with both hands and the mag tube hit the ground and the but stock fell back into his hands or body and he then regained control of it that would be a dropped gun.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have sat on the arbitration committee at a major match to decide the definition of a dropped gun. The rules for this particular match did not define dropped gun. As a committee we determined that a dropped gun is one that is no longer in control of the competitor. When shooting from prone, parts of our rifles are in contact with the ground, when clearing a stuck case, part of our rifle (violently at times) comes in contact with the ground. Therefor, I believe coming in contact with the ground is only slightly relevant to the case of a dropped gun.

If the competitor did not lose control of their firearm and the muzzle remained pointed in a safe direction, based on my understanding of the event I would say there was no safety infraction. But, depending on what set of rules the match you were at was using, this may or may not be the case.

Edited by Bryan 45
Link to comment
Share on other sites

just compensating.....I still run my 10rd RCI Xrail tube that is even with my 26" barrel. in most matches where I can move and load, there is plenty of room and I'm fast enough to load while on my way to the next shooting position. With the match saver, I have 12 on/in the gun when fully loaded.

I wouldn't DQ the guy if his mag tube scraped the ground if he remained in control of the gun...if it got sideways and made your hole pucker, another story.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would agree with Patrick, as well as add, lose control of is not the same as placed there. just because you are no longer touching the gun, doesn't mean it was dropped, we place guns in barrels and safe boxes and are no longer in control of them but they weren't dropped nor is that a DQable offense. I have placed my pistol on the ground and stood up after shooting prone only to bend back over and retrieve it and holster it, it was not dropped but I was no longer in contact with it.

on the OP's topic, was it unsafe gun handling,????? maybe, was it questionable gun handling???? certainly, should they be warned, oh yeah!!!,..... DQ'd???........NO.

Trapr

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In this case I would say the pucker factor was high for 2 reasons, the first because the rifle that had just been dumped into the barrel was teetering on the rim of the barrel. Yes perfectly balanced on the edge of the barrel it never came out or touched the ground and always in a safe direction. The second was the action of the picking up the shotgun, I could tell it was loosely gripped and always touching a hand but about as close to loosing control as possible. So it was not pretty.

And yes the shooter got a speaking to from a seasoned vet, and did well the remainder of the day.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have placed my pistol on the ground and stood up after shooting prone only to bend back over and retrieve it and holster it, it was not dropped but I was no longer in contact with it.

Trapr

Any time I'm going to do something "funky" like Trap's example, or ripping off a gunbelt to clear an obstacle, or anything that I think the RO might not have seen that day, I always try to "ask permission". Some ROs handle the unexpected better than others, and the more they know about what I'm gonna do the less chance there is of getting stopped in the middle of a stage or DQ'd.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have placed my pistol on the ground and stood up after shooting prone only to bend back over and retrieve it and holster it, it was not dropped but I was no longer in contact with it.

Trapr

Any time I'm going to do something "funky" like Trap's example, or ripping off a gunbelt to clear an obstacle, or anything that I think the RO might not have seen that day, I always try to "ask permission". Some ROs handle the unexpected better than others, and the more they know about what I'm gonna do the less chance there is of getting stopped in the middle of a stage or DQ'd.

While it may be annoying to some RO's when I ask "obvious" questions like this.....I usually try to ask as well and think it's a good practice. I do it a lot with 180 questions where I feel its well within 180, but unsure how it would look to an RO who is standing 3' behind me with a timer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If it's permissible by the rules, why "ask" the RO? I agree it's courteous to inform them of what you're going to do and I myself do the same, but no need to ask permission for something that is permitted.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If it's permissible by the rules, why "ask" the RO? I agree it's courteous to inform them of what you're going to do and I myself do the same, but no need to ask permission for something that is permitted.

arguing with the RO as to if you were 175-179 degrees versus 181 degrees after he has already told you that you are DQ'd from the match is less than ideal. A simple "i'll be fine here right?" or "can I set this down to stand up then clear it?" only takes a second and can avoid a Reese's blizzard for what you feel was stupid

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A 178 degree vs. 182 degree issue is much more subjective and I agree that is a good question to ask, as the RO is the one that determines if something is safe or not.

I was referring to Dan's example and I agree it's courteous to inform the RO of your intentions, but simply said it's not something that needs to be presented as a question.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...