FearsomeCritter

Delivered 4/14/21. So a touch more than 11months for me. Worth the wait.

Snap, I ordered mine 5/7/20. Haven't heard anything yet though.

I just received an SVI officers 2011 with the infinity extended profile trigger guard. Finding a holster has been challenging. Does anyone have a similar gun and holster recommendations? I was thinking the DVC carry would be similar dimensions.

I ordered last April and got the call last week that mine just has 2-3 weeks left. So just about right at 15 months.

Go with a local guy. That is pretty basic work and I wouldn't want to potentially have my gun gone for weeks plus shipping on a job that will take less than an hour to do.

Scott, what do you feel the advantages of the DPP and the like to the standard C-More?

38sc, 115 PD JHP, 10.1gr 3N38 Trubor = 174-175 CK Arms comp with 3 poppel holes = 172-173

I started running MBX mags in my KKM barreled open gun and found the front upper edge of my mag getting peened out. So I would agree that this Intel is accurate.I never experienced reliability issues and addressed the issue by simply filing off the peened out area on the mag. No further issues. I should clarify a bit on this too. I was getting some FTEs in the form of nose dives which I attributed to this contact. At the time I filed the mags I also decreased my OAL from 1.232 to 1.228. I can't entirely claim the FTEs were secondary to mags contacting.

Oh I forgot to mention, if your CK gun has a KKM barrel, you will probably have to trim the top front of the mag where it approximates the barrel feedramp by 2-3mm. The earlier MBX mags were shorter here but the new ones, as of when I bought them a year ago, will contact the feedramp and cause malfunctions. Pretty easy to do with diamond files or a dremel. Kinda a pain in the ass but I still like the MBX mag bodies more than STI as you don't have to fiddle with the mag lips. Filing is easier than fiddling to me. If you get them and run into this issue just shoot me a PM and I'll send you photos.

I use MBX mags but their springs/followers kept rolling on me. I swapped in a TTI spring/follower in one 140 and grams for the other 2 140 and 2 170. All have been running great, get 29rds in the big stick which is what I was getting with the MBX guts. Interestingly I tried some new TTI guts in them and was getting rolling issues too. The 1 140 with TTI still running strong though. Weird. If I had to do it again I'd get the MBX tubes and pads and buy grams.

Does the top of the magazine contact the bottom of the barrel feedramp? I had this issue with my KKM barrel and had to cut the mags back a 3mm. Was getting FTE and it went away after the fix.

I forgot to add.....If running a PCC match is significantly different than a handgun match then how are no changes required to put a rifle in a handgun match. It is not starting from scratch, it is using the handgun and 3gun rules as a guideline and making changes where needed. All it takes is the people that want to shoot it setting it up. Running a PCC only match is not significantly different than running a USPSA match with PCC. What is being argued is that tacking PCC onto USPSA is different and easier than setting up and organizing a completely separate match.

Because changes in start position only applies to PCC as stated in the provisional appendix.

Except that your statement is a good argument for adding PCC to USPSA as opposed to creating a separate sporting entity How do you figure that? Because you can draw those extra shooters make the club money when you otherwise could not hold a match just for one division and have much success. Your argument is the say as saying Revolver shooters should do their own matches. Their not pistols after all their revolvers. Damn I was typing this exact thing.

Except that your statement is a good argument for adding PCC to USPSA as opposed to creating a separate sporting entity

No you can't run a PCC with zero changes. the proposed appendix proves that as well as having to modify positions that PCC shooters shoot from in some stages. Saying zero changes is just wrong If PCC was so popular at SHOT then it shouldn't be to hard to create stand alone matches. I mean if there is so much industry support why not. Why not? I know several matches can and have run PCC with zero changes to the match. Yes PCC has different start positions but it has zero effect, well maybe 10 extra seconds reading the WSB. Creating standalone matches is completely different. I'm assuming you've never done it yourself. I set up matches all the time. Yet still haven't answered my question

What information do you have to support that if PCC can't do a specified start position (for example uprange starts) then everyone who shoots the match will have to follow the changes as opposed to PCC just being modified?

No you can't run a PCC with zero changes. the proposed appendix proves that as well as having to modify positions that PCC shooters shoot from in some stages. Saying zero changes is just wrong If PCC was so popular at SHOT then it shouldn't be to hard to create stand alone matches. I mean if there is so much industry support why not. And those changes apply to PCC shooters, not to handgun shooters so...

Well if a club was going to split it there are more options than having the same crew work all day.

Slide racker > no slide racker My backup gun is sans racker and that is going to be the first thing I upgrade.

Edit: double tap

I have an 8 on my main open gun and a 6 on my backup gun. I like the 8 a little more but didn't really notice the switch when shooting my backup gun.

I'd be all for an afternoon session anyway on account of me being super lazy and sleeping in

Well at least you moved towards my direction a little, that's something. That's the problem with applying terminology from the business world to division management: costs have to be clearly stated and preferably proven. Easy to do in business world because it all comes down to money. Cost could be assessed in relation to divisions as competitiveness of a division, with, generally speaking, decreased participation being the cost. Quantification of this has yet to be established over months, but that is the purpose of provisional divisions. The overcrowding thing is getting into a whole other problem of expansion of USPSA members vs crowding of local matches and a topic not limited to nor completely contained by PCC. Just give in, waste some money on another gun, and try it. One of the benefits of not having the weapon strapped to you is that they can be shared easily -- ask a friend.

Pistol caliber carbine