Mac7938 Posted October 18, 2020 Share Posted October 18, 2020 On 9/30/2019 at 7:38 PM, Beef15 said: Quite a bit. With 124fmjs, 135 and 147 coated. Takes me 0.2gr more than Titegroup or Bullseye to make PF. Clean enough, not snappy. So, you’re talking 3.8 gn Clean Shot under a 147 gn ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xrayfk05 Posted October 18, 2020 Share Posted October 18, 2020 A 147 shouldn't need more than 3.2 to 3.4 depending on coated, plated or FJM for 130 PF. 3.8 with 124 can make FP in some guns with some bullets but on average you will need 4.0/4.1 depending on. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RaylanGivens Posted October 18, 2020 Share Posted October 18, 2020 On 10/4/2019 at 12:51 PM, bigboy69 said: How much difference do you see in FPS when its really hot out? I dont know how much of a difference it would make for steel. If you mean Steel Challenge, there is no power factor. Shoot the load you like. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wdfwguy Posted October 21, 2020 Share Posted October 21, 2020 I chrono'd some Clean Shot recently, along with some other known minor loads. CZ Shadow 2 124gr Eggleston TC coated Win headstamp Fed SPP 1.10 OAL 3.8 N320 1064 fps 23 es 7 sd 3.8 Sport Pistol 1050 32 11 3.8 Win 244 1048 12 4 3.9 Clean Shot 991 48 14 4.1 Clean Shot 1018 35 10 4.2 Clean Shot 1044 29 9 4.3 Clean Shot 1047 23 8 I then loaded some rounds with 4.2gr Clean Shot, and shot groups. It was consistently the most accurate of the four different loads. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wdfwguy Posted October 21, 2020 Share Posted October 21, 2020 (edited) Please delete Edited October 21, 2020 by wdfwguy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wdfwguy Posted October 21, 2020 Share Posted October 21, 2020 (edited) Please delete Edited October 21, 2020 by wdfwguy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wdfwguy Posted October 21, 2020 Share Posted October 21, 2020 (edited) Please delete Edited October 21, 2020 by wdfwguy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
124gr9mm Posted October 21, 2020 Share Posted October 21, 2020 I like it. As others, I have found it to be a bit cleaner than Titegroup. I originally tried it because Titegroup was just way too smokey with coated bullets and I was looking for an alternative. While LESS smokey than Titegroup, CS is still too much for my daughter's sensibilities, so it's gone in the "backup" pile. I landed on Win 231 for coated... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hlsccsfa Posted October 25, 2020 Share Posted October 25, 2020 +1 for Cleanshot. Pros: 1. Cost less than N320, about the same as Titegroup 2. Meters extremely consistent on Dillon powder measure, better than Titegroup, much better than N320 3. Much more clean burning than Titegroup, on par with N320 4. Plenty in stock, even in crazy 2020 Cons: 1. For the same bullet weight to get to the same pf, it requires 0.3 - 0.4 gr more compared to Titegroup. My recipe: Gallant bullet 147gr rn loaded to 1.110" OAL, federal primer, when use 3.4gr cleanshot, average pf is 129 with SD 4 - 7, when use 3.6gr cleanshot, average pf 132 with SD 8 -10. Temperature 70 degrees. All test rounds uses brass with the same headstamp. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bigboy69 Posted November 25, 2020 Author Share Posted November 25, 2020 So I've been shooting this powder a little more now and I'm really liking it especially under a blue bullet. I'm using the 125 RN now and I'm waiting for my 135 TC's to show up, but they said mid December. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now