Alamstutz Posted July 25, 2014 Share Posted July 25, 2014 Primer experiment Recently I had an opportunity to buy 1000 cci magnum small pistol primers. I had some concern about using them so I conducted an experiment. I loaded 20 identical .40 S&W cartridges and put CCI magnum primers in 10 and regular CCI small pistol primers in the other 10. I fired all 20 thru my chrono and the results were: the average of the ten cartridges with magnum primers was 859 ft per second. The average of the ten standard primers was 854 ft per second. I was surprised with these figures and my conclusion is that, in this application, there is virtually no difference in performance between CCI magnum small pistol primers and CCI standard small pistol primers. I am wondering what any of you might make of this information. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
superdude Posted July 25, 2014 Share Posted July 25, 2014 What gunpowder? What bullet weight? What OAL? I'm not surprised by the results, but it might depend on what gunpowder is used. Some gunpowders might respond differently than others. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hi-Power Jack Posted July 25, 2014 Share Posted July 25, 2014 I use them interchangeably. They are probably (IMHO) the least important compenent in reloading - necessary, of course, but changing powders or bullets or bullet weight/type or powder charge is much more important. Of course, if you're talking re: top of the line powder charges, it's possible that primers could be of some concern - but, probably not too much. IMHO. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve RA Posted July 25, 2014 Share Posted July 25, 2014 About the same result I had trying Tula LPPs in Federal LPP cases with 4.2 Clays and a 200gr LSWC against Federal small primer cases with same load and Tula KVB-223 SRPs. I only did 5 of each where you did ten and neither result would impress a statistician with the small base size. I'm pretty well convinced in my own mind that the differences are negligible. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jstagn Posted July 26, 2014 Share Posted July 26, 2014 I used Winchester large pistol primers (for standard and magnum loads, according to the box) the Winchester ran about 30fps faster than federal, with 4.1 gr Clays (45acp). You could hear and feel the differences. Solution, use .1 less. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toolguy Posted July 26, 2014 Share Posted July 26, 2014 In my revolver loads, the difference averages about 15 FPS faster with Fed. sp Mag. than Fed. sp Regular. Most loadings have a greater FPS variation with all the same load so I use them interchangeably. These are for light and mid range target loads. I use Mag. Primers for Mag. loads. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr Mitch Posted July 26, 2014 Share Posted July 26, 2014 (edited) I only use small rifle primers in my pistol loads, FWIW. The reason is so I only have to stock one type of primer. Never saw a measurable difference on the chrono between SPP and SRP, but I also didn't expect too. Edited July 26, 2014 by Dr Mitch Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alamstutz Posted July 26, 2014 Author Share Posted July 26, 2014 What gunpowder? What bullet weight? What OAL? I'm not surprised by the results, but it might depend on what gunpowder is used. Some gunpowders might respond differently than others. Powder was PB 4.2 gr. 180 gr xtreme RNFP bullet. OAL 1.31. All the same for both batches of ten Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now