Jump to content
Brian Enos's Forums... Maku mozo!

.223 vs 5.56 cartridges how many times to reload


Quag

Recommended Posts

I am new to reloading .223. I have Wylde chamber so I can shoot 5.56 just fine. So accumulate pratice brass I bought a case of American Eagle 5.56 NATO 55 grn FMJ ammo. I am recovering all the brass and removing military crimps and trimming it before I reload it. There is some .223 Remington mixed in. I've noticed the 5.56 cases have thicker walls. Are they likley to stand up to more reloads than the .223 brass. If I want brass is there an adavantage to 5.56 brass? BTW the 5.56 AE NATO chronos abt 3300 fps and the box says 3150.

Thx

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like the military brass - Lake City. Either will work but I would suggest separating 5.56 from .223 as the case capacities will vary due to the Mil cases being thicker - less capacity.

I do the same. If I am at, or exceeding, book max loads, I will sort by lot to avoid too much variance.

Lighter hoser loads, I use mixed brass (trimmed with an RT1200) and keep re using it until splits appear in the shoulder or primer pockets loosen. This always seems to happen before other failures.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like to keep my brass sorted by head stamp. It will produce a more consistent result in general.

My experience with Federal brass is that the thicker 5.56 seems to be less likely to split at the case neck but the primer pocket loosens up at generally the same rate as the 223. My experience with Lake City brass is very similar. In all cases the primer pocket seems to be what gets the brass retired most of the time.

I hand prime. If I have a primer go in that feels like it is getting lose I put it in a separate bin. I load those for situations where I am not able to recover my brass.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lake City brass has more case capacity than any other .223/5.56 case, therefore the cases are not thicker "BUT" they are made harder than their civilian SAAMI .223 counterparts. This is because they are designed to be fired in larger diameter chambers and this prevents the base of the case from over expanding and jamming the military firearm.

casecap_zps3f8bb2c9.jpg

Below is the milspec requirements for 5.56 cases, they are thicker at the flash hole web, and the cases that are thinner in this area will fail much sooner with loose primer pockets.

556milbrass_zpsebfa3b7a.jpg

Below are the Rockwell hardness readings for .223/5.56 cases.

LC 2008 = 96

Lapua 223 Match = 86

Winchester 223 = 69

Remington "R-P" = 49

556hard-a_zps7570e6b0.jpg

hardness-a_zps8d54ad66.jpg

Replying to .223 vs 5.56 cartridges how many times to reload?

Bottom line, you will be limited by how "HOT" you load your cases, the hardness of the brass and the amount of shoulder bump when resizing the case.

In my AR15 rifles I load 25 grains of H335 and try to keep the chamber pressure at or below 50,000 psi for practice at 100 yards or less for long case life.

Lake City and any civilian military contract ammunition will be harder and last longer than the softest commercial .223 brass meaning Federal and Remington at the bottom of the scale.

Meaning Lake City cases are built Ford Truck Tough and the rest are built like Chevy's. :devil:

f-btough_zps3fdc205c.jpg

PISS_ON_CHEVY_zpseb7d18c1.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thx big ed I've got to get to my computer and print this out I know mil brass is a pain to decrimp but it looks like it's worth it to get a good batch going

PS. I don't like chevie either

Edited by Quag
Link to comment
Share on other sites

just don't reload federal brass, it is very soft. You can reload it 1x or so, but the primers will open up quick. Not sure what brass the AE is loaded in.

Thanks, I may start segregating .223/5.56.

Does the Federal have a FC on it? The AE is mostly military LC stamps plus some .223 Remington thrown in.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lake City brass has more case capacity than any other .223/5.56 case, therefore the cases are not thicker "BUT" they are made harder than their civilian SAAMI .223 counterparts. This is because they are designed to be fired in larger diameter chambers and this prevents the base of the case from over expanding and jamming the military firearm.

casecap_zps3f8bb2c9.jpg

Below are the Rockwell hardness readings for .223/5.56 cases.

LC 2008 = 96

Lapua 223 Match = 86

Winchester 223 = 69

Remington "R-P" = 49

interesting side note is the difference in case capacity for the LC brass for '04 and '06. I've always wondered if there was a difference year to year, lot to lot and have separated by year. I thought maybe it was overkill, but did it anyway since all the once fired LC will be used for my long range load. Has anyone tested different year's of LC for consistency? I know most people just group it by make.

Also, what a big difference in hardness between LC and RP. I knew RP was known to be soft. I wonder where FC comes in...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Also, for the same load, I noticed that the loads in the FC brass was hotter than the same load in WCC brass. I've since backed off a tad. I use the FC for lost brass matches and don't care to try to load it again. Which is a shame, since it was crimped and a bit of work to get it to be ready to load.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

this might explain my mixed results, I chronoed 12 rds of mixed brass at 25 grns H335 yesterday and it was not much different than my chrono loads of 24 grns H335 but I noticed the 25 grns seemed much louder. I've got to get new ear protection for my .223 anyway.

Both had 55grn Hornady 55 FMJ and CCI SR primers

I think I might work up my chrono loads based on segregated brass

Edited by Quag
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...