Jump to content
Brian Enos's Forums... Maku mozo!

Coated Bullet Profile - Does it Matter?


cjmill87

Recommended Posts

In my Tanfoglio the TC is more accurate. 

In my M&Ps the RN is more accurate. 

My CZs & Glocks don't seem to care.

They sell small sample packs so you can get a variety of profile/size/weight combinations and work them up to see which you & your gun likes best. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, cjmill87 said:

I'm looking to start reloading coated bullets, specifically Blue Bullets, and wondering if profile (Round Nose vs. Truncated Cone) matters?  I'll be loading in a Gen4 Glock 17 and looking to load something in 124/5 grain weight.

 

If your Gen IV is throated like previous gens, you should be able to load any of them to your desired OACL. That must be confirmed by plunk and spin.

 

For those who want a longer load, but have a pistol with a shorter chamber in the barrel, here's a bullet style that will allow you to do that. The bullet above the shoulder is smaller diameter that won't touch the lands. Just set the shoulder a bit above the case-mouth as you would with a SWC in .45 ACP.😉

https://www.snscasting.com/9mm-125-grain-round-nose-red-coated-1000ct/

 

Edited by K-Texas
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can usually load the TC types longer than RN , and they make cleaner holes in paper. Accuracy seems about the same to me,but I’ve never really done any controlled experimenting on that fact.  Both are more accurate that I am offhand.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...