Aircooled6racer Posted December 8, 2017 Share Posted December 8, 2017 Hello: My Acme 122 grain load for a 16" AR9 was 3.1 grains WST which gave me 125.1-128.2 PF. I would bump it up to 3.3 grains and chrono it. I like 131-134PF in my AR9's. Thanks, Eric Link to comment
JAFO Posted December 8, 2017 Share Posted December 8, 2017 21 hours ago, MikieM said: There's not a thing wrong with that number. Here's the way I look at it. If I can chronograph 10 rounds that give me an averaged PF of 125, I'm tickled pink because according to USPSA, that's legal. Well, maybe if you consistently got an average of 125 (truncated, not rounded) over 3 shots, not 10. Link to comment
abigger04 Posted December 10, 2017 Share Posted December 10, 2017 Nice looking rigs. What type of magwells are you using? Link to comment
wgj3 Posted December 10, 2017 Share Posted December 10, 2017 1 hour ago, abigger04 said: Nice looking rigs. What type of magwells are you using? Fairly certain those are both Taccom magwells. Link to comment
MikieM Posted December 10, 2017 Author Share Posted December 10, 2017 (edited) 2 hours ago, abigger04 said: Nice looking rigs. What type of magwells are you using? Thank you. Yes, they're Taccom's. Back-in-the-day, when I was building guns, like the one you see in my avatar, the thought of making a mag-well on a printer was pure science-fiction. The only thing we made on a printer was a news-letter, that came from a typewriter, about an up-coming match. Edited December 10, 2017 by MikieM Link to comment
MikieM Posted December 10, 2017 Author Share Posted December 10, 2017 On 12/8/2017 at 12:38 PM, bladewurk said: I have found data all over the place, including Hornady data going up to 5.4 grains. I guess the current WST lots, barrels and chambers make a big difference as the more current data seems much lower. Remember blade, Hornady's pistol data is based on a 4 inch barrel. If you used WSF, say, at recommended loads, you would notice a lot of unburned powder. This is because WSF is a slow burning powder relative to the small 9mm case. Put that same load in a 16 inch barrel where all the powder can be consumed and you'll see a big difference in velocities because of the increase in pressure. This is good news because it allows us guys with 16 inch barrels to reduce our loads and still get the velocity we want (and the PF we want). And, we all know that a reduction in powder weight means a reduction in recoil. So, how long is too long? According to the Ballistics By The Inch chart we've pretty much run out steam by the 15 to 17 inch mark so, lucky us, we're right there at the sweet spot at 16. Link to comment
JAFO Posted December 12, 2017 Share Posted December 12, 2017 On 12/9/2017 at 11:39 PM, MikieM said: Back-in-the-day, when I was building guns, like the one you see in my avatar, the thought of making a mag-well on a printer was pure science-fiction. The only thing we made on a printer was a news-letter, that came from a typewriter, about an up-coming match. Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now