benos Posted June 9, 2005 Share Posted June 9, 2005 I get this question often: What is the difference between the RL-550 as opposed to the RL-550B. The RL 450 became the RL 550 with the addition of the interchangeable Toolhead. Then the RL 550 became the RL 550B with the addition of the Automatic Priming and Powder Measure Systems to the RL 550. It's "been the "B" for probably 18 -20 years. Then, over the years, other changes were made to the RL 550B: The Powder Measure system was changed from being spring operated to the current "Failsafe" system. An electrical warning system was added to the Auto-Priming mechanism. be Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Greg Jones Posted June 10, 2005 Share Posted June 10, 2005 Brian, I bought a 550 in the mid-80s, later upgraded it to a 550B and kept it until last September when I sold it and bought a 650 from you. My memory is that the 550 had the auto priming and powder measure system. The "B" update included the early primer warning system and the fail safe rod for the powder system. The powder measures were still spring-operated, with the linkage return system added several years later. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
George Posted June 10, 2005 Share Posted June 10, 2005 Can't remember fer'sure, but I too kinda remember it being the 550 with auto prime/powder and the B upgrade was the safety fluffs later. I got mine in early 1988 (still using it) and remember something about getting the upgrade parts free from Dillon when they were available. I'm gonna go looksee what I can see from my press and from my records. More later, Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
benos Posted June 10, 2005 Author Share Posted June 10, 2005 Brian,I bought a 550 in the mid-80s, later upgraded it to a 550B and kept it until last September when I sold it and bought a 650 from you. My memory is that the 550 had the auto priming and powder measure system. The "B" update included the early primer warning system and the fail safe rod for the powder system. The powder measures were still spring-operated, with the linkage return system added several years later. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Actually that's what I thought as well, which wasn't what I was told. And, since the GM Troubleshooter wasn't in that day, I guess we'll just have to wait till he sees this thread. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CenTX Posted June 11, 2005 Share Posted June 11, 2005 On my 550 I replaced the crank, link arms, link arm pin and associated parts (see attachment). The new 550B parts are different than the old parts on my 550. The 550B link arms and crank have small holes in them (lubrication holes?) and the pivot rod (link arm pin) that goes through the crank is larger with smaller diameters on both ends while the 550 link arm pin was only one diameter. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kimel Posted June 11, 2005 Share Posted June 11, 2005 It is quite common for an item to undergo "evolution" over time without the model numbering changing. If this was done we would probably be at the 550Z by now. This is probably an enormous headache for the support folks but change is inevitable and often for the better. I believe the pin holes for lubrication are a very recent change. There is a post around here somewhere from Dillon about that change. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dillon Posted June 13, 2005 Share Posted June 13, 2005 The RL450 was replaced by the RL550 in May, 1985. There RL550 had three primary improvements;the detatchable toolhead, automatic priming system, and the automatic powder system. In April, 1985, several dozen RL450s were shipped with the detachable toolhead frame, as we had run out of the older solid frames, but didn't have the automatic powder and priming systems ready. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Derek45 Posted June 13, 2005 Share Posted June 13, 2005 I remember when the Dillon catalogs were printed on newspaper, when did that change ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Front Man Posted February 20, 2006 Share Posted February 20, 2006 About the same time Auto Week went from a newspaper format to a magazine format. I miss the newspaper format of both. FM Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now