Jump to content
Brian Enos's Forums... Maku mozo!

Misused Generational Titles


Steve J

Recommended Posts

I hate pretentious generational titles that are misused with surnames on name tags (particularly in the military) and on sports uniforms.

It's Joe Blow III or Joe III (if you're royalty or the head of a religion), but it is not Blow III. Just like its Joe Blow, Jr. or Joe Jr., but not Blow Jr.

Everyone in your family is a Blow. You're the third Joe, not the third Blow.

Jeez people get over yourself and learn to use it correctly.

Edited to add an 's'. Spelling counts as does grammar.

Edited by Steve J
Link to comment
Share on other sites

<_< Hey Brother

Xmas makes me grouchy too ;)

So many demands, so little time.

I used to just shake my head at the military name tags - Franklin III and the like. What set me off was a Football Jersey on the local news - GAY IV. Really? GAY IV? Isn't that the peace keeping contingency force for San Fran? :ph34r:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I always thought it was misused by George Foreman, with five sons - Jr, III, IV, V, & VI

instead of his son being Jr, Jr's son being III, and so on.

But maybe I'm behind the times...

Guy

And it's perfectly acceptable and occasionally practiced for them all to move up a number when one of the elders dies. How confusing is that? Get over yourself and buy a book of baby names.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I must really be "into" myself since I have no idea what the highlighted part is saying???????????????

Guy

I always thought it was misused by George Foreman, with five sons - Jr, III, IV, V, & VI

instead of his son being Jr, Jr's son being III, and so on.

But maybe I'm behind the times...

Guy

And it's perfectly acceptable and occasionally practiced for them all to move up a number when one of the elders dies. How confusing is that? Get over yourself and buy a book of baby names.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I must really be "into" myself since I have no idea what the highlighted part is saying???????????????

Guy

I always thought it was misused by George Foreman, with five sons - Jr, III, IV, V, & VI

instead of his son being Jr, Jr's son being III, and so on.

But maybe I'm behind the times...

Guy

And it's perfectly acceptable and occasionally practiced for them all to move up a number when one of the elders dies. How confusing is that? Get over yourself and buy a book of baby names.

That wasn't aimed at you. :blush: That was in reference to George Foreman's 1-5.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...