Duane Thomas Posted January 26, 2006 Share Posted January 26, 2006 Hmmmm, I've always thought winning was the goal. Losing just sucks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jim Norman Posted January 26, 2006 Share Posted January 26, 2006 Unless I am mistaken, don' tthe guys that are doing entries try and obtain a layout of the building and the location of the threat and non-threat targets PRIOR to entry and don' tthey set up mock courses and run them until they know every trun they will make? Obviously this can't always be done, there can be time contraints and I am sure not all buildings in occupied hostile territory have available blueprints to study, but when available, don't they get taken advantage of? Kind of like the USPSA walk-through??? Jim Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Genghis Posted January 26, 2006 Share Posted January 26, 2006 harmongreer once said that equipment cannot be tactical. I think he meant that tactics are how the user employs the equipment. cnemikeman said that equipment can be Tacti-Cool, rather than tactical. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dfwmiket Posted January 26, 2006 Share Posted January 26, 2006 harmongreer once said that equipment cannot be tactical. I think he meant that tactics are how the user employs the equipment. cnemikeman said that equipment can be Tacti-Cool, rather than tactical. Yeah, but that too, is Harmon's expression. I gotta give credit where it's due. I didn't think that one up all by myself. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Genghis Posted January 27, 2006 Share Posted January 27, 2006 So Harmon said it, but you made it famous. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now