zzt Posted April 4, 2015 Share Posted April 4, 2015 I just received the two sample packs of Falcon Bullet Company's Falcoated 40sw 180gr TC bullets. While chatting on the phone I asked what they were coated with and was told it was their own proprietary polymer coating that included a lubricant. I was also told that shooters using their coated bullets reported making Major with less powder than any other bullet. I told her if that were true, she should have it plastered all over their web site. Naturally, I had to test this out. 55 degrees. Mixed 40sw brass, CCI 500 primers, 3.7gr e3 powder, 1.135" OAL, all 10 shot strings. Lubed lead TC = 960fps avg, 4.83SD, 172PF BBI TC = 953fps avg, 6.90SD, 171PF Falcon TC = 979fps avg, 7.15SD, 176PF So it appears to be true. This is the first coated bullet that has been faster than lubed lead. The coating is not applied to the base of the bullet. The coating is a lot smoother than other poly coatings and it has no smell when fired. No smoke either. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jstagn Posted April 13, 2015 Share Posted April 13, 2015 Maybe the lead core is softer allowing for a better seal. What about accuracy? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zzt Posted April 13, 2015 Author Share Posted April 13, 2015 Lead core is Brinell 18, so it isn't soft. Accuracy was the same as lubed lead. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kamikaze1a Posted April 16, 2015 Share Posted April 16, 2015 (edited) Interesting... Did you mic the diameter or compare their weight? I have not found coated to give higher velocity than regular wax lube...yet. Edited April 16, 2015 by kamikaze1a Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zzt Posted April 17, 2015 Author Share Posted April 17, 2015 They were .401" and the weight varied within a 1gr range typically, and a 2gr range including a couple of extremes. Pretty much what I find with lubed lead. For a comparison, I tested again using a much slower powder, N340, with everything else being the same. Results were: Falcon TC 975fps, 175PF, SD 3.51 Lubed Lead TC 958fps, 172PF, SD 8.69 BBI TC 904fps, 162PF, SD 12.57 a surprising result. I have no idea why the wider Delta with the slower powder. Although the SDs are good, or almost good, I think this powder too slow for this use. A surprising amount of flame comes out the front of a 5.1" barrel. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cslafrain Posted April 17, 2015 Share Posted April 17, 2015 The best powders I have found for 40 in a coatef bullet is N320, WST, Ramshot Comp. I like Clays as well but some are too scared to use it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dauntedfuture Posted April 22, 2015 Share Posted April 22, 2015 There are lots of companies that are using the same molds out there for the 180's. Without looking at the three bullets and measuring diameter and weight it is hard to tell. Usually what happens with friction reducing agents is that velocity is less then it would be for the same bullet as it reduces pressure as well. I think the simple answer is that the bullets are a little bigger diameter then some of the others but without looking, comparing and measuring its hard to tell. 75 fps is a significant result. 19 fps could be a fluke. Bullet hardness can also be a factor. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now