Jump to content
Brian Enos's Forums... Maku mozo!

Expansion Industries Powder


hcf1976

Recommended Posts

I've done some testing in .40 minor and 9mm.

The 147gr Berry's plated 9mm were excellent! The .40 loaded to minor velocity under 165gr Berry's was too inconsistent with the large amount of empty case. Once the case was filled up, it became much more consistent, dropping from 200fps es to <30, before opening back up again. I did not try working any of it up at major velocity on purpose, though I did hit major at the hottest load.

Here's a copy/paste of what my findings were on a local forum:

Foreward:
Without much in the way of published load data for this proprietary powder, I began with charges significantly lighter than what Expansion Industries listed on their facebook page, which are quite diluted and non-specific.

Also, my goals and requirements in hand loading are catered towards shooting USPSA competitions. Currently I am shooting a Tanfoglio Stock II, .40S&W caliber in the Production division. Production division requires a minimum Power Factor of 125, which is determined by Velocity x Bullet Weight in grains / 1000. Using 165gr Berry's plated bullets, I need a minimum of 757fps. Recently I've switch from 180gr projectiles to 165gr to get a higher velocity at comparable power factor for minimum recoil/muzzle rise. My desired velocity that I'm aiming to achieve before larger batch testing is 850-875 for a faster cycling slide as compared to the 180gr at around 750fps I have been using.

As with the majority of powders, I discovered Expansion Industries's ETR7 to be inconsistent at very light loads. At 3.3gr, the slide failed to cycle completely 50% of the time, while also having a huge swing in velocity. I did not achieve satisfactory extreme spreads in velocity until 4.5gr and heavier.

Overall thoughts so far in testing:
Burns considerably cleaner than my current two primary powders, Hodgdon Titegroup and Winchester WST. Where both TG and WST leave significant residue in the chamber and on the forward 2” of dust cover closest to the muzzle, the ETR7 left only a slight light yellow hue on the first 1/4” of the dust cover. Further testing is needed on higher round counts as only about 100 rounds were shot today in total.
Muzzle rise/felt recoil seems comparable to Titegroup. Next I will be loading 200 rounds at 4.4/4.5gr to test the feel and comfort very soon.

40s&w chrono

180gr Polymer Coated Lead Bayou Bullet, 3.1gr Hodgdon TiteGroup, Winchester Small Pistol Primer. Used as a base load for desired power factor and “feel”.
740
741
764
767
762
777
766
774
739
757 avg
38 es
14 sd
136.2 pf

165gr Berry's plated flat point, 3.3gr Expansion Industries ETR7, Winchester Small Pistol Primer.
533
529
652
590
540
622
559
540
655
446
556 avg
209 es
64 sd

165gr Berry's, 3.5gr Expansion Industries ETR7, Winchester Small Pistol Primer.
625
616
646
705
638
678
573
629
628
641
637 avg
132 es
35 sd

165gr Berry's, 3.7gr Expansion Industries ETR7, Winchester Small Pistol Primer.
759
738
659
679
729
705
665
751
650
723
705 avg
109 es
40 sd

165gr Berry's, 4.0gr Expansion Industries ETR7, Winchester Small Pistol Primer.
775
739
726
742
738
739
782
689
777
735
744 avg
93 es
27 sd
122 pf

165gr Berry's, 4.2gr Expansion Industries ETR7, Winchester Small Pistol Primer.
752
784
773
791
797
770
756
761
854
761
806
782 avg
102 es
29 sd
129 pf

165gr Berry's, 4.5gr Expansion Industries ETR7, Winchester Small Pistol Primer.
885
870
868
899
875
889
841
858
890
862
873 avg
58 es
17 sd
144 pf

165gr Berry's, 4.75gr Expansion Industries ETR7, Winchester Small Pistol Primer.
904
883
897
902
904
900
905
906
924
920
904 avg
41 es
11 sd
149 pf

165gr Berry's, 5.0gr Expansion Industries ETR7, Winchester Small Pistol Primer.
901
958
958
921
911
944
934
955
946
946
919
933 avg
57 es
19 sd
153pf

165gr Berry's, 5.25gr Expansion Industries ETR7, Winchester Small Pistol Primer.
983
976
980
969
977
998
994
977
981 avg
29 es
9 sd
161pf

165gr Berry's, 5.5gr Expansion Industries ETR7, Winchester Small Pistol Primer.
973
1008
996
990
1013
1002
1045
1025
1015
1007 avg
72 es
20 sd
166 pf
_____________________________________

_____________________________________

I did a bit more testing today with this powder and have mixed results to report.

Continuing with the .40s&w from yesterday, I loaded 200 rounds of 165gr Berry's flat point bullets over 4.4 grains of ETR7 for some accuracy and perceived recoil testing. To start with, I shot 3 sets of 10 rounds over the chronograph.

4.4gr ETR7
851
855
786
843
836
859
844
829
810
864
837 avg
78 es
24 sd
138pf

4.4gr ETR7
845
794
794
842
804
864
811
868
802
761
818 avg
107 es
34 sd
134.9 pf


4.4gr ETR7
847
786
852
794
827
866
854
896
887
767
837 avg
129 es
43 sd
138 pf

As you all can see, I'm not getting consistent velocity with this powder. Just to confirm function of the chrono, I ran 5 rounds of my tried-and-true 180gr Bayou Bullet over 3.1gr of TiteGroup:
Overcast 40sw

Bayou 180, 3.1 tg
769
731
744
731
736
742
38 es
15 sd
133.5 pf

The extreme spread of the ETR7 was more than doubled (or higher) than the Titegroup.

On the positive, this load felt great in hand. I ran the remaining 170 rounds thru the gun doing various drills to help quantify my findings and thoughts versus the 180gr bullet load I have been shooting. The gun is considerably faster cycling as expected. The sight lift is very predictable - faster than before. I'm not waiting for the slide/sight to return to break the next shot as before. The dustcover, rails and ejection port of my Tanfoglio was left considerably cleaner than when shooting Titegroup, with less gunky gelatinous build up.

I also tested some load work ups using 147gr Berry's 9mm today. I will say that this powder appears to be very well suited to 9mm, producing a much more consistent velocity and was extremely soft shooting. At this point, I plan to batch test another 200 rounds loaded with 3.6-3.7 grains of ETR7 for more input, but I feel that this may replace the 3.4gr of TiteGroup I have been using for my 3gun pistol load.

Here's the results for your consideration:

Smith and Wesson M&P Pro 5"

147gr Berry's Flatpoint 9mm
Expansion Industries ETR7 powder

3.0gr
811
788
796
799
800
798
776
796
794
761
791 avg
50 es
14 sd
116 pf

3.25gr
823
847
839
839
840
828
841
840
829
834 avg
24 es
8 sd
122.6 pf

3.5gr
870
869
861
860
850
874
877
855
877
853
865 avg
24 es
8 sd
127.1pf

3.75gr
917
897
913
919
900
903
939
903
900
909 avg
36 es
11 sd
133 pf

4.0gr
955
960
968
951
969
937
956 avg
32 es
11 sd
140.5 pf

Here are my original posts about it, along with a couple other guys findings:

http://www.vaguntrad.../topics/769637/

135874.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

I have been using it with 9 mm guns. I have a S&W M&P 9 and a Ruger SR9c.

With Frontier 124gr CMJ and Berry's 124gr. FMJ, I began using the loads that they published on their site and paperwork, but that did not work very well at all. In order to get the S&W M&P 9 to work and cycle properly, I have had to increase the powder load to 4.6gr. The Ruger SR9c works OK with 4.3gr, but not any lower.

I am about to change to Berry's 115gr. FMJ, and will have to start guessing all over again. I wish they had more extensive load data available.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Since the loading data provided by Expansion Industries is so uninformative (how does a powder company not give even a test barrel length or velocity for their charges), I figured I'd include the data I gathered so far for ETR7 as well. I have noticed that, where our bullets and charges overlap, I got noticeably higher avg velocity than the OP did with his loads. No idea if that's temperature related or entirely from being different barrels.

All data collected with a CED M2 chronograph

9mm 124g Berry's plated RN, OAL 1.152", 59F, ETR7, Federal small pistol primer, CZ75 SP01

ETR7 3.8g
Avg 979fps, 121.4PF
SD 8.6
ES 25

ETR 4.0g
Avg 1024fps, 126.9PF
SD 11.0
ES 30

ETR 4.3g
Avg 1059fps, 129.9PF
SD 9.4
ES 26



40S&W 180g Berry's plated FP, OAL 1.120", 59F, ETR7, Winchester small pistol primer, G35 with Lone Wolf .40 barrel

ETR 4.6g
Avg 921fps, 165.7PF
SD 13
ES 36

ETR 4.8g
Avg 937fps, 168.6PF
SD 12
ES 45


.45 ACP 200g Berry's plated FP, OAL 1.120", 59F, ETR7, Federal large pistol primer, Springfield 1911 w/5" barrel

ETR 4.8g
Avg 661fps, 132.1PF
SD 35
ES 90

ETR 5.0g
Avg 736fps, 147.1PF
SD 35
ES 98

ETR 5.3g
Avg 772fps, 154.3PF
SD 22
ES 53

ETR 5.55g
Avg 822fps, 164.3PF
SD 10
ES 30

Link to comment
Share on other sites

$100 for 4 lbs is expensive, no? Haven't bought powder in a while, but I think I was getting 8 lbs of WST for less than $150.

Yeah. 8lbs of Promo is still just a little over $100...if you can find it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The only way I've managed to get any powder in the last two years is catching something available on Powder Valley, buying 24-32 pounds of it to spread out the hazmat and shipping, and then reselling 8-16 to friends. For those who either can't afford to sink $500-$700 on an order, or have had no luck finding powder, $25/pound beats having nothing. I picked up 4# of this just to find something that I can use for practice ammo and conserve the stuff I use for matches.

Is it my first choice, or even my second? Not a chance. But I figured I"d at least share the data I have so far since their load data is so lacking.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

The only way I've managed to get any powder in the last two years is catching something available on Powder Valley, buying 24-32 pounds of it to spread out. the hazmat and shipping, and then reselling 8-16 to friends. For those who either can't afford to sink $500-$700 on an order, or have had no luck finding powder, $25/pound beats having nothing. I picked up 4# of this just to find something that I can use for practice ammo and conserve the stuff I use for matches.

Is it my first choice, or even my second? Not a chance. But I figured I"d at least share the data I have so far since their load data is so lacking.

I've been loading this powder in 40cal and I'm very pleased with it and how clean it is I'm sold on it for sure...
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...