Nimitz Posted December 14, 2014 Author Share Posted December 14, 2014 unfortunately not officially until Jan 1, however it will be fun to make my initial classification a GM so that will be good motivation to get there by Jan Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ZackJones Posted December 14, 2014 Share Posted December 14, 2014 unfortunately not officially until Jan 1, however it will be fun to make my initial classification a GM so that will be good motivation to get there by Jan You have a whole year - the new classification system is effective as of 1 Jan 2016. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nimitz Posted December 14, 2014 Author Share Posted December 14, 2014 exactly ... however, I expect to be there by the Nationals in March .... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
photoracer Posted February 19, 2015 Share Posted February 19, 2015 I agree with Zach's approach in theory. The question is how to set the baseline. I pulled the data for the rimfire pistol at Nationals. You need a number less than 65 to start with. 25% of the rimfire shooters at Nationals were under this for the 6 classifier stages. Which baseline to choose depends on your motivation. If the motivation is to have GM be the top 5% at Nationals then you would choose 50 seconds and have very few GM's (Only Max and Heath were under 50 seconds for the classifier stages). If you used 50 seconds the breakdown using Zack's approach would be: GM 50 seconds 2 people M 57.5 seconds 6 people A 65.5 seconds 5 people B 88.5 seconds 20 people C 154 seconds 10 people D 384.5 seconds 4 people That is a pretty reasonable spread. If you wanted to have more GM's then you might go either 52.5 or 55 but if you do that then you would likely want to narrow the brackets so that you don't get too top heavy. Input? This looks closer to reality. At the various Ruger/NSSF world championships I generally shoot somewhere between mid A to top B in percentages compared to the pros like BJ and others. And since my best 6 classifier stages from 2014 total around 65.85 that looks about right. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now