RangerTrace Posted July 17, 2014 Share Posted July 17, 2014 I just got my G19 back from having some work done, which included Heinie sights. The front sight is .215 and the pistol is shooting 5" high at 10 yards. According to the Dawson Precision formula, I need a .300 tall front sight. Does that sound ridiculously tall? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
45 Raven Posted July 18, 2014 Share Posted July 18, 2014 Yes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guy Neill Posted July 18, 2014 Share Posted July 18, 2014 From the Glock website, the sight radius is given as 6.02 inches. The formula for sight change (as I determined it a while back) is sc = (sr * ic)/36R with sc = sight change (inches) sr = sight radius (inches) ic = impact change (inches) R = range (yards) so for your situation, sc = (6.02 * 5)/(36 * 10) = 30.1/360 = 0.084 inches meaning the rear sight must be elevated by 0.084 inches or the front sight decreased by the same amount to raise the point of impact 5 inches at 10 yards. as I see it. I haven't seen what Dawson has as a guide. Guy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guy Neill Posted July 18, 2014 Share Posted July 18, 2014 Oh - I might emphasize, that the calculation shown uses Glock's (G19) normal sight radius. If the new sights have changed the sight radius it will change the value of the needed adjustment. Guy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RangerTrace Posted July 18, 2014 Author Share Posted July 18, 2014 From the Glock website, the sight radius is given as 6.02 inches. The formula for sight change (as I determined it a while back) is sc = (sr * ic)/36R with sc = sight change (inches) sr = sight radius (inches) ic = impact change (inches) R = range (yards) so for your situation, sc = (6.02 * 5)/(36 * 10) = 30.1/360 = 0.084 inches meaning the rear sight must be elevated by 0.084 inches or the front sight decreased by the same amount to raise the point of impact 5 inches at 10 yards. as I see it. I haven't seen what Dawson has as a guide. Guy That is the same number I get, using their formula. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now