Gene_WI

We have a match coming up on January 20th in Lodi, 25 miles from Madison. https://practiscore.com/wgc-wi-uspsa-monthly-match-20-january-2023/register Come shoot at our club.

Call SVI. I had a similar problem on a 9 major gun. Right around the same round count. Extractor was broken. I got a new breech face and extractor.

I agree. Its over for the org. The only question now is what can/will be salvaged. As an observation. I have served on multiple boards, and worked with and for non profits. When financial data is being purposely concealed there is almost certainly embezzlement or other serious issues.

Hypocrisy destroys institutions. If YML was de certified for inappropriate horse play at a major match, Troy needs to get the boot.

His six figure salary is supported by our volunteer efforts. PCSL is looking better and better every day.

Not only that but people making six figure salaries were unable to ensure basic corporate compliance. Think about that...

I think USPSA in its current form is done. The mismanagement is so severe that the org is probably beyond saving. I would not be surprised if some of the current board members/employees end up doing time for fraud. The sport will be fine. The rule set will live on, some other entity will by buy it and keep going.

A locap dot division is what we need. I though that making L10 an optics division was a great idea.

YML was an RO for a stage I shot at a larger match. He was curtious and exceptionally professional.

If anyone from the org is reading these posts. This looks very very bad for the .org

They switched. I just had an SVI gun come back to me from the factory with blue grease in it, SVI said its lucas. They used to ship guns out with red grease (red and tacky) in them. Its different from the blue oil, they include.

Grease is Lucas that's what Brandon told me.

So long term, assuming USPSA does't go bankrupt in the near future. What should happen. Optics will dominate, and I think in the next 5-10 year irons will be a thing of the past. Should LO have major/minor scoring and become what limited is today for iron sights? Just curious what you think. You make a good case for having a striker DA/SA divisions separate from SAO.

I was being sarcastic about G19. If LO is driven by the perceived need to include staccato and springfield 2011s in a competitive division; why not just include them in carry optics, under the same production gun rules list as everything else. Do you think if that happens 2011s will dominate the division? I think we have way too many divisions, and it takes away from the sport. Section\area match performance should count for more in the classification system. With the current rules, every new division we add makes a match bump that much harder to attain.

That is a very reasonable perspective. I can see why CO should stay as is. The limited optics debate I think is largely because of "production" grade 2011s coming to market, and the sport asking where do they belong? The above begs a question, why should all guns be competitive? The Glock 19 is probably the most carried gun in the US, (I carry one) I don't think its in any way competitive in any division. Should we have a Glock 19 division to accommodate me shooting my carry gun at the nats.... etc.