slavex

see this is where problems are gonna start and it's going to be hard to keep people honest. are we going to see people pulling hammers and sears and comparing them to a box stock factory one? if someone is really talented, they can alter the face of a sear and change the engagement surface enough to make the SA trigger totally different from factory, and really improve the initial DA pull, but at the same time, I've owned and played with other pistols the same as mine where the trigger, from the factory, was as good as, or better than some that had been worked on. It all depends on who fitted the gun at the factory, if the machines that cut angles were using new tooling etc etc etc. So many variables, and depending on the mood of the person testing the gun, or the phase the moon is in, it's going to be a mess at a big match. Is there really any way to keep people honest? I don't think so, at least not without having to take steps that would make it impossible to run a match effectively. groan............. I wonder if this will ever get sorted out properly?

ok so is polishing my sear and hammer, and back of the trigger bar on my Beretta allowed or not? all that is being done is that burs, and rough contact areas are being smoothed over.

not trying to hijack here, but why make the rear site on the Beretta narrower? if you are really intent on doing this, I think it would be far simpler to just shape your own rear site out of raw steel, than to mess with a Novak.

First post here, I think another question would be about the Worlds. If and when the Worlds are held in the USA next, what rules are followed? USPSA or IPSC or a strange combo of both? I know a number of shooters from up here in Canada that do shoot in the USA and obviously they shoot following USPSA rules, and vice versa for when Americans come up here. I would expect the Worlds, no matter where they are held to follow IPSC rules. but hey what do I know, I've only been in IPSC for a little over 1.5 years.