Jump to content
Brian Enos's Forums... Maku mozo!

atbarr

Classifieds
  • Posts

    2,008
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by atbarr

  1. Right now it seems to be harder to find a good sight at a reasonable price than it is a gun.

    not to mention spending the price of the gun all over again.

    For posting as much as you do you are surprisingly unhelpful.

    Yep, a lot of haters following this thread. I hope Rob Leatham doesn't see it, and sell his CO pistol. :roflol:

  2. Timing is everything! I went to http://mod1firearms.com today, and basically Pike was getting ready for the Pro-AM. I talked to him about milling both the G21 and G19 for a RMR. He talked me into just doing the G21.

    Then he said, "I’ll give you a call in a few hours and you can pick it up.” Wow, that blew me away. Not only did he turn down some work, he did almost an immediate turn around. I took it out to BGSL and just sighted it in, not shooting for >two weeks did a job on me.

    So, a bunch of dry firing for me.

    Thanks Pike!

    The weights below from a USPS electronic scale.

    G21 + RMR + empty 13rd mag = 30.2 oz.
    G21 + RMR + empty 13rd mag + Tungsten Guid Rod = 31.7 oz
    So I could add 3 oz. if I wanted to.

    post-14692-0-65835300-1440018690_thumb.j

  3. Area Director email, good idea. may email them all since the frame mount I'm refering to is in almost every state in the country. And most of them are owned by USPSA members.

    'Our' Forum, uspsa.org? Not following you, I'm not aware (or can't see it) of a Forum on the USPSA.org website.

    Thanks for the thoughts.

    Sure, go to 'Member Support', then then look at the bottom left.

  4. zhunter, thanks, I was wondering if I had missed the point of the previous 70 pages of the conversation.

    Beyond that, I think 'Production Optics, is the already, inevitable arrived future that we can still define and shape. I'm not in agreement with limiting the division to slide only optics at all. that's like putting watered-down gas in Porsche! Anyone that thinks this is missing the whole point of adding an optic to a production gun. IF The idea is to add an optic to a production (stock gun (ie leaning towards tactical/carry)), why does it have to ONLY be slide mounted. There are advantages (tactical & competitive) to mounting it to the frame. The slight added weight decreases recoil and improves target trackability, just for starters.

    Why don't you email your Area Director, and post this on 'Our' Forum, uspsa.org?

  5. A couple of years ago, I purchased a Zev Open Glock. When I finally got the PF high enough for the comp to work, the recoil did a job on my arthritic hands and wrists. I didn't try shooting Open with minor PF, that would be foolish.

    Now I need to decide which one of my Glocks, I'm putting the RMR on. Right now I shoot Production with either my G21, G30, or G41. I also have a G17 and G19, but really like the larger holes.

    I'm looking forward to shooting this Division.

  6. From Rick Steele, Area 5 Director

    "We talked about this at the Board meeting. We are trying to make it easy for the shooter to try the Division without putting out a lot of money. If you machine the slide for the dot and then remove the dot, you will need to fill the machined area with a plate of similar material (steel in most cases) to make it look like a production gun. That will probably depend on how deep you machine the slide. Troy McManus will be the deciding factor as we walk through the issues in this new division.

    Since this is a provisional division the ruling on that may change but that is what the Board talked about at the meeting.
    You can also use a dovetail mount. It will make the dot a little higher than normal sights but it is very easy to return it to a Production gun."
×
×
  • Create New...