para man Posted April 23, 2002 Share Posted April 23, 2002 I've seen 2 different.38 super listed.. One with a 1/16 twist and one with a 1/32 twist.... Is there a difference ?? If so what ? Is one better than the other ?? if so why ?? Which one do I need ??? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ong45 Posted April 23, 2002 Share Posted April 23, 2002 1/32 was originally made to shoot 115 gr. bullets . I don't know if it was successful , but if it is any indication, sheumman is now doing 1/20 or 24. I have used 1/16 for a while with great results James Ong Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kbear38S Posted April 23, 2002 Share Posted April 23, 2002 The idea of the 1/32 twist rifling was that it imparts less rotational torque to the shooter and is easier to control. Given that Schumann is the only manufacturer to produce a 1/32 barrel for Super and everybody else is successfully shooting 1/16 barrels, it's apparent it's a non-issue. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flexmoney Posted April 23, 2002 Share Posted April 23, 2002 Para Man, Knowing your gun. You'll want a barrel with 1/16 twist. You will also want to be shooting bullets in the 124 grain range. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rich Bagoly Posted April 24, 2002 Share Posted April 24, 2002 Why don't you ask the manufacturer? http://www.schuemann.com/twist0.htm (Edited by Rich Bagoly at 6:40 pm on April 23, 2002) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gm iprod Posted April 25, 2002 Share Posted April 25, 2002 Rumour surrounding the 1/32 barrels was that John Pride gave one a try. I don't know if he is still using it. But Doug K would most likely have a fair idea. The slower the twist the shorter the bullet, in theory this will make the bullet lighter, = less recoil. Unless you shoot DU. The main advantages with a slow twist barrel is that it imparts less torque on the barrel, therefore the pistol, when fired. Any load would have a minutely smaller charge for any given velocity, and I suspect that if you went to a faster burning powder the charge could be reduced even further to help keep recoil down. Less wear and tear on a barrel as less energy would be lost to spinning the projectile. More energy put into making it go forward therefore faster. Benchrest shooters take this to the extreeme. They use the slowest possible twist to enable them to keep the projectile pointy end forward. Everybody who counts seems to stick with the simplest solution. Go with 16 to 20 twist Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now