ZackJones Posted January 7, 2014 Share Posted January 7, 2014 We shot 13-05 this past weekend and our setup ended up being very similar to the image on the left. If the intention is to have it set up like it is in the image on the right then we were way off base. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sperman Posted January 16, 2014 Share Posted January 16, 2014 It looks like they adjusted some of the HHF's for the 13 series classifiers. I wonder how they decided to calculate the new values. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ssanders224 Posted January 16, 2014 Share Posted January 16, 2014 It looks like they adjusted some of the HHF's for the 13 series classifiers. I wonder how they decided to calculate the new values. This. I had a couple of 13 series get turned in on this update. They were a good bit lower than I had calculated that they should be ( was expecting 90-95% on both based on previous entries from other updates... They showed up this morning as 80-85%). I don't care about the hit in % (although it did hurt my avg.). What I do care about is the "hmm, let's move the HHF to X" mentality. I'd sure like to know WHY and HOW it is changed. The lack of transparency and published procedure is pretty off putting. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mosher Posted January 17, 2014 Share Posted January 17, 2014 I shot 13-05 on Nov 9th with a 7.2 HF and got a 79% in the classifier record when it updated in December, I shot 13-05 on Dec 21st with a 8.3 HF and got a 76% in the classifier record when it updated in January. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now