Joe4d Posted January 25, 2011 Share Posted January 25, 2011 My point was, 6 inch Paras were deemed legal because there were 500 6" components, and Super duper famous guy had one even though at that time Para had never made a 6" gun. While the True sight and Sighttracker top end were deemed to only be Limited legal if they were mounted on a S_I frame, because that was the only way 500 complete guns were made. This is a hypocritical double standard, Since Dan Wesson has evidently announced they are only making 40 guns I am wondering which interpretation of the rules NROI will decide to use ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Team Amish 1 Posted January 26, 2011 Share Posted January 26, 2011 I wonder what the purpose of the utility rail on the Limited gun is. Gorgeous gun but the recon frame throws me off. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Resjudicata Posted January 26, 2011 Share Posted January 26, 2011 My point was, 6 inch Paras were deemed legal because there were 500 6" components, and Super duper famous guy had one even though at that time Para had never made a 6" gun. While the True sight and Sighttracker top end were deemed to only be Limited legal if they were mounted on a S_I frame, because that was the only way 500 complete guns were made. This is a hypocritical double standard, Since Dan Wesson has evidently announced they are only making 40 guns I am wondering which interpretation of the rules NROI will decide to use ? I'd never heard of this. However, I believe I've seen that gunsmiths like Jim Anglin have built Caspian based wide body 6" guns. I've never heard of a problem with them. Chris Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now