I'm showing the results for *all* classifiers. Some classifiers have distant partials, while others are easy. You can see from the charts that statistically speaking, people tend to shoot similar time, but same or better points in CO than Production on all of them. Sample size is big enough for it not to be a fluke. For classifiers where HHF is the same between CO and Production (everything before CM19-01) it means that it's objectively easier to get a given classification in CO, although not by much.
There is no data on individual targets, but I find it hard to believe that on some kind of targets Production would give an advantage, yet you could not see it in the classifier level data. There are classifiers like "Can You Count" where red dot does not give any advantage, but classification is determined from *average* of six classifier results, so it's the *average* that counts.