Jump to content
Brian Enos's Forums... Maku mozo!

Vlad

Classifieds
  • Posts

    2,830
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Vlad

  1. Sniper 2 was awfull .. specially when he admires his "Mauser" which is a Mosin.  Sniper 3 was not as bad, except for those hundred yard hangun head shots while in a roll dive. Who the hell scripted that? The rest was no where near as absurd.

    Vlad

    There are some spoilers of Sniper 3 in this post, but don't worry, I doubt it is possible to "ruin" this movie.

    Oh, I think Sniper 3 was worse than 2 (which was awful too). I mean... The vietnamese dude running around with 2 pistols, the final stupid standoff, the way TB "kills" the bad guy. The fact that after TB kills him, the entire mob following the bad guy now adores him... For God's sake it was hideous!

    Note I only said "not as bad" as opposed to "not bad". They were both terrible, we just have the order reveresed. I can live with that. :D

  2. Sniper 2 and Sniper 3. Oh, Tom Berenger, what have you done... :(

    Sniper 2 was awfull .. specially when he admires his "Mauser" which is a Mosin. Sniper 3 was not as bad, except for those hundred yard hangun head shots while in a roll dive. Who the hell scripted that? The rest was no where near as absurd.

    Vlad

  3. My vote goes to: 2 Fast 2 Furious

    That and Torque ... Which was extra evil because for some reason I couldnt stop watching despite a lack of any value what so ever. ...

    Well it did have a very funny line. The protagonist walks away saying "I live my life a 1/4 mile at a time" and his girlfriend says "That is the dumbest thing I have ever heard" which was a pretty cool because I hate that line in The Fast and the Furious.

    Vlad

  4. Also, Battlefield Eartch was a Heinlien book I think, and I think he was the founder of scientology and therefore some of the Hollywood "types" like John Rivolting wanted to pay homage by making that POS.

    Whoa there! You mean L. Ron Hubbard not Heinlein. You put Heinlein in the same bag with the scientalogists people are going to come after you with torches and pitchforks. And I'll be one of them ....

    Vlad

  5. But ... but .. Battlefield earth is so much worse because it seems like every bad decission in making that movie was intentional and made by people who should know better.

    My additions to the list are:

    Resident Evil 2

    Empire of the Ants

    Battlefield Earth

    Starship Troopers

    Day after Tomorow

    Face/Off

    Vlad

  6. Setting up affirmative-action for 1911's is tantamount to admitting they aren't competitive anywhere else. See the IDPA rants about CDP and .45 GAP or 10mm or whatever.

    And other than SSP, CDP is by far the most popular division in IDPA. There's a lesson there, I think.

    I hate to disagree with you here, as I hold great respect for your opinions. But as far as I can tell IDPA was designed such that the 1911 was the ideal gun for it. It is no different the cowboy sports being protectionist of their gear and designing the game around it. If you design a game aimed at shooting standing on one foot it is going to be popular with people missing a leg.

    Vlad

  7. A lot of people had constructive advice and critisism in this thread and I think that most of what I could contribute about the "creation" of this division has been already said.

    However I have a different question. When and how do we decide it has worked or that it has failed? How many shooters do we need to see involved? After how long do we call it a failure or success? If those benchmarks are not set at the outset then how will we ever know if the effort is worth it.

    Personally I predict failure. You are asking to create a different game within a game. What other design do we protect with its own DIVISION? Why is Flex's question not given more attention? There are a LOT more glocks used then 1911s and I've even sure that a lot more of them are being sold everyday. If the only real reason is to make a class where the SS can be trully competitive because of their capacity issues then why not allow the Sig220 or Taurus 945 or the Ruger whatever, all of them single stack 45s. I really think it is out of character for USPSA to create a protectionist division for the 1911. Think of it this way ... Would you support a USPSA Division for the Colt Single Action Army revolver? After all it can not compete against the high zoot double action revolvers and pivoting cylinders. And think of all the shooters and sponsors we might attract from CASS*! Does this sound like a good idea to anyone?

    I get that lots of people love the old gun. I do to. I shoot mine in L10 and it is one of my night stand guns. But I do not feel the need to claim that it is the ULTIMATE boom stick of instant death and request a pool in which it can swim by itself. Folks, please rememeber that there is a P somewhere in USPSA and IPSC and we should try to see what works best, not only what worked best at some point.

    Vlad

    *The SSA idea was shamelesly stolen from forum member raz-0 who had that idea in our office the other day.

  8. Whataheck ..

    Left Front pocket Streamlight Scorpion and cellphone (unless I forgat the cellphone somewhere in my car, home, or office. I never forget the flashlight). Right front pocket has my key ring and my wallet depending on season (wallet sits in my jacket during the chilly seasons). The key ring includes the usual mess of keys plus my USB drive, and my one time password card for work. My DDR3 folder rides in its one pocket along my right thigh (I love the Cabelas 7 pocket hiker pants). I carry nothing in my rear pockets, but small front pockets (the change type) often have listerine strips or spare rounds to top of my 10 rounders during USPSA matches. My belt has my leatherman WAVE about 50% of the time, the rest of the time in end up in a pocket somewhere as well. I think that also depends on the weather and the number of garments I'm wearing

    I note that lots of us have LARGE pockets.

    Vlad

  9. That movie was a pleasent suprise. I added to my blockbuster movie queue based on this thread, and I actually caught it on some premium cable channel last night. I wouldn't call it earthshattering cinema but I enjoyed it. Catch it if you havent already and thanx Erik for pointing it out.

    Vlad

  10. Well sorta cheap but not really .. I mean it doesnt include a keyboard, mouse, or monitor in that price. Not to mention that once you add those "accessories" which take a lot of desk space, who cares how small the computer itself is?

    For $500 you can get Dell Inspirion 1000 Notebook (not from the website but in their paper adds) with the same specs and a better CPU and it already includes the monitor and keyboard. The latest Dell ad I got had a comparable desktop for $249 (without monitor or keyboard). And I'm not even that big of a fan of Dell machines, I'm just using them as an example.

    I started my professional CS life on macs, but for the last 10 years I have yet to find a single reason to go back. Its Unix and Windows for me.

    Vlad

×
×
  • Create New...