Jump to content
Brian Enos's Forums... Maku mozo!

ScottyPotty

Classified
  • Posts

    162
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by ScottyPotty

  1. Yes, the Dillon has been more consistent and is easier to adjust then using the disks. Plus I had an extra measurer sitting around so i could dedicate it to the LCT.

    The next riser i make will allow me leave the powder die in the tool head. This one will have to be unthreaded and rethreaded into the next tool head. I just wanted to prove this worked before I go to all the trouble.

  2. Having issue with bullet set back with some FMJ . I can easily push the bullet back into the case. I'm using a dillon sizer and have tried both the dillon crimp die and the lee factory crimp die.

    The brass is a mix of range pick up. Would a U die help with this?

  3. Just get the 550B it will be worth it in the long run. Things like primer feed, case eject and the powder measure are worth having and it will give you more flexibility for future projects.

    Then again.... Why have 2 different calibers conversion, different tool heads, different spare part, have something setup on the 550 but want to do something else that is already set up for the 550. You might as well just get another 650 so everything is identical.

    That's what happened to me.....

  4. Why does the Uniqtrek baffle help when the DIllon already has a baffle in the powder hopper? Do you baffle the Baffle? :surprise:

    As Brian said, it will likely be of little or no improvement for smooth metering pistol powders... However, I've ordered one to test in my "making Varget meter consistently and smoothly" experiment... along with a bunch of other stuff.

    I read somewhere, and agree in priciple that IDEALLY, if you use the Precision Powder Baffle, the plastic powder baffle in the stock Dillon powder hopper should be removed/cut out. Then the Precision Replacement Baffle is placed in the powder hopper relatively low in the tube... Throw a bunch of charges and check for consistency. Raise baffle up in the tube a bit and measure again... REPEAT. Theoretically, there should be a sweet spot in the tube for max consistency and this spot will likely vary by powder.

    The above is based on what I have read elswhere, although I plan to do an experimen to test it out...

    I think the Precision Powder Baffle was originally intended for use in replacement powder hoppers... like the extended ones... 2X Powder Hopper for the 550/650 and the 11" hopper for the 1050. The replacement tubes don't have moulded in baffles...

    ^^^^^^^^^^^

    What is a curved washer? How is it different from a stander washer?

    Dillon calls them "bowed washers" in the exploded parts views... Some places call them wave washers... I call them a "compromise" at best. I loathe them, and remove them from ALL my powder measure bellcrank screws... and the micrometer powder bar kit eliminates them from the powder bars. ;)

    You may find static and humidity may affect your results.

  5. I'm a newbie to reloading so please pardon me if this is an ignorant comment and question.

    I'm loading .45 ACP LSWC's and I'm guessing that that there is not enough of the full diameter part of the bullet exposed above case mouth to use either a collet puller or the Grip-N-Pull (video above).

    So, is a kinetic / hammer puller the only option for me?

    The bullet in the pictured load is actually seated a little higher than I like. EC3_45ACP_LSWC_400x382.jpg

    how many do you have to pull? If its just a few a hammer will do, if you have a bunch to pull, I would try to find a collet puller that would fit the taper section on the bullet.

×
×
  • Create New...