dave pasos Posted April 5, 2002 Share Posted April 5, 2002 What is the status of the Major 9 issue? Will it be soon or will we have to wait a few more years? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chriss Grube Posted April 5, 2002 Share Posted April 5, 2002 In speaking with Bruce Gary after my proposal was voted down, it appears to be on the verge of becoming a reality. The BOD's big concern was liability from the wording of the original ban. They have acknowledged that most .40,9x and supers are over SAAMI specs so they opened up a bigger liability issue. Bruce told me that once the annual audit was done that the legal firm was to be given the task of coming up with proper wording that puts the responsibility for all equipment on the shooter. Basically if you blow your hand off from an over pressure load or some other mishap you are the sole bearer of the burden. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rkgsmith Posted November 2, 2002 Author Share Posted November 2, 2002 Some of you have already looked at the pages "IPSC or USPSA Questions (if you haven't take a look) concerning the upcoming Major 9 vote. I've been elected by our chairman to come up with some published loads to support the campaign. If anybody has some favorites I would greatly appreciated it. I'm looking for current data, Ie. Powder, Bullet, OAL, and velocity if possible. Thanks, and long live the major 9. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Klev Posted November 3, 2002 Share Posted November 3, 2002 I've been using these loads for approx. 3 years. Never had any problems. 175PF: Gun: SPS open (4 hibrid ports, 6 ported comp) brass: Remington; V-V 3N37 (8.3gr); primer: WSPM or WSR; OAL: 1.220; Speer 124gr FMJ; av.speed: 1431 fps 165PF: V-V 3N37 (7.9 - 8.0gr); av. speed: 1305 - 1320 fps These loads were safe in my gun but I wouldn't use them with shorter OAL than 1.220! DVC! Klev Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flexmoney Posted November 3, 2002 Share Posted November 3, 2002 rkgsmith, Sierra list three loads in 9x21 (same as 9x19 for what we are looking at) that make Major at 1.165 OAL. Those are book loads! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carlos Posted November 4, 2002 Share Posted November 4, 2002 Will check my data this eveningl I concure that 9x21 loads where the OAL is within 9x19 specs are all fair game for demonstrating what is obvious to the rest of the world: 9x19 loaded to meet major PF (now, even lower!!) is just as safe as any of the other loads we have allowed in USPSA. Can you honestly say that 9x19 at 165 major is somehow less safe than .38 Super was at the old 175PF? Anyone remember there ever being a lawsuit against USPSA because we allowed .38 super at the old 175PF? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now